Spatial Linkage of Technological Progress, ICT base and Economic Output in CLMV Region

Chhorn, Theara (2017): Spatial Linkage of Technological Progress, ICT base and Economic Output in CLMV Region.

Abstract

Rising technological progress and innovation, ICT base toward the era of modernization and globalization in developing countries has driven economic into the new structure of transitional development. The paper examines spatial linkage between technological progress and economic output in CLMV region during the observation period of 1995 to 2016. The conventional approach overcome simple RE and FE estimation, say FGLS and MLE-GLS reveals the consistency of empirical outcomes. It yields the crucial role of technological progress, as the proxy of internet server connection and ICT, computer import products in boosting the structure of economic output which generate to the growth rate in CLMV region. The findings suggest policy maker in exerting policy toward climate investment and trade to bring the country into path of facilitating flows of capitals, goods and service, particularly the business structure in line with adopting the technological innovation.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Commentary on: Eprints 0 not found.
• Language: English
• Keywords: Technological Progress, Economic Output, Economic Significance Analysis, CLMV
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C33 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights

References

Adak, M. (2015). Technological Progress, Innovation and Economic Growth; the Case of Turkey. World Conference on Technology, Innovation and Entrepreneurship (pp. 776 – 782). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 195.

Ahmad Jafari Samimi et al. (2015). ICT & Economic Growth: A Comparison Between Developed & Developing Countries. International Journal of Life Science and Engineering, 1(1), 26 - 32.

Alani, J. (2012). Effects Of Technological Progress And Productivity On Economic Growth In Uganda. International Conference On Applied Economics (ICOAE) 2012 (pp. 14 – 23). Procedia Economics and Finance.

Benhassen, H. M. (2015). Impact of Information Technology and Communication on Economic Growth. International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management, 4(2).

Gemma Estrada, D. P. (2010). Financial Development and Economic Growth in Developing Asia. Asian Development Bank.

Hausman, J. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251-1271.

Hsiao C. (1986). Analysis of panel data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hülya K. Ç. (2015). Technological Change and Economic Growth. World Conference on Technology, Innovation and Entrepreneurship (pp. 649 – 654). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 195.

Judge et al., G. G.-C. (1985). The Theory and Practice of Econometrics. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.

Kemp, S. (16 Feb 2017). DIGITAL IN SOUTHEAST ASIA IN 2017. Retrieved from https://wearesocial.com/special-reports/digital-southeast-asia-2017

Khuong Vu -, K. (n.d.). Measuring the Impact of ICT Investments on Economic Growth. Program on Technology and Economic Policy, Harvard Kennedy School of Government.

M. Farhadi, R. I. (2012). Information and Communication Technology Use and Economic Growth. PLoS ONE, 7(11). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048903

M. Kuppusamy, M. R. (2009). Whose ICT Investment Matter to Economic Growth: Private or Public? the Malaysia Persepctive. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 1-19.

Niebel, T. (2014). ICT and Economic Growth - Comparing Developing, Emerging and Developed Countries. IARIW 33rd General Conference . Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Saidi, K. H. (2015). Econometric Analysis of the Relationship Between ICT and Economic Growth in Tunisia. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6(4), 1191–1206.