Governance Innovation for SOEs in Bulgaria: Based on Korean Experience

Park, Jin and Dimitrov, Mitko and Bobeva, Daniela and Keremidchiev, Spartak and Tchipev, Plamen (2016): Governance Innovation for SOEs in Bulgaria: Based on Korean Experience. Published in:

Abstract

The recent financial performances of many Bulgarian SOEs have revealed the shortcomings in the management of its SOEs. The main direction of Bulgarian reforms should be improving transparency, better selection and appraisal of management, sustainable dividend policy, strengthening financial discipline and coherent ways to reduce the debt burden. The institutional status quo is clearly inefficient and needs to be replaced. The direction of SOE governance reforms in Korea and Bulgaria are substantially different. Korea has maintained a very centralized grip over SOEs for an extended period of time, and it needs to reduce government intervention by guaranteeing more autonomy for SOEs. On the other hand, Bulgaria needs more centralized control over SOEs, which is expected to improve their performance. The Korean experience in reforming its SOE management system is highly relevant for Bulgaria and it complies with the OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises. This paper asks 31 questions regarding a system of good governance and presents options for each question regarding positive and negative aspects, followed by specific recommendations for the Bulgarian government. It is recommended that a centralized authority responsible for the management of SOEs be established which is composed of line vice-ministers and experts from academia and the private sector. Major tasks and responsibilities should be transferred gradually from line ministries to this new setting. Among these include increasing transparency, the introduction of an evaluation system with strict consequences and related open competitive procedures for the selection, the appointment and appraisal of CEOs, as well as an annual bonus system. SOE governance reform in Bulgaria will touch off strong resistance from both line ministries and their SOEs. Therefore, it will require a good deal of effort and strategy to accomplish the task. It is important to win the minds of the people and the political leadership in that the current system is subject to a number of problems, and that reform of the system is critical to a more efficient economy and provision of better public services to its citizens.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Public Enterprises, Government Policy and Regulation, Enterprise Policy
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise > L32 - Public Enterprises ; Public-Private Enterprises; L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L52 - Industrial Policy ; Sectoral Planning Methods; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M3 - Marketing and Advertising > M38 - Government Policy and Regulation

References

References

Dinavo, Jacques V. Privatization in Developing Countries; Its Impact on Economic Development and Democracy. 1995.

Keremidchiev, Sp. “State and Main Characteristics of the Privatisation Process in Bulgaria.” Sociological Problems 4, 1993: 30-42, 1993. (in Bulgarian).

Kim, Hyunsok, Gaesung Park, and Jin Park, Self-Criticism on Government Reform. Seoul: Parkyoungsa, 2006. (in Korean).

Kotter John P. Leading Change. Harvard Business School Press, 1996.

Ministry of Planning and Budget, How Korea Reformed the Public Sector, 2002.

Ministry of Strategy and Finance, Press Release, 2008.8.11.

Park, Jin, “Solutions to Liability of SOEs,” Assessment of Korea’s Fiscal Soundness and Policy Agenda, edited by Sungtae Kim and Jin Park), KDI, 2015. (in Korean).

Park, Jin, “The Role of State-Owned Enterprise,” Korean Experience in Providing Infrastructure to Promote Economic Development, edited by Kyungwook Hur, KDI School, 2014.

Park, Jin, Public Sector Reform, Overcoming the 1997-98 Crisis, edited by Koh, Youngsun, Knowledge Sharing program, Ministry of Strategy and Finance, KDI, 2010.

Park, Jin, “Lessons from SOE Management and Privatization in Korea.”, KDIS working paper 09-16, 2009.

Park, Jin, “Comparison of Two Government Reforms,” co-authored with Jong-In Yoon, Transforming Korean Public Governance, OECD/Korea Policy Centre, 2008.

Park, Jin, et al. Analysis on the Market Participation Function of Public Institutions, Korea Institute for Public Finance, 2013. (in Korean).

Park, Jin, Analysis on Potential Risk of Public Institutions and Policy Agenda, Korea Institute for Public Finance, 2012. (in Korean).

Tchipev, P. D. “Bulgarian Mass Privatisation Scheme: Implications on Corporate Governance.” Journal of Economic Studies 30, Number 3/4, 2003: 351-388.

Tchipev, P. D. “Corporate Governance in Bulgaria’s Accession to the EU: Corporate Boards Perspective.” Economic Studies 17-2: 152-181.

Parker, David and David Saal, International Handbook on Privatization, 2003.

Martin, Stephen and David Parker, The Impact of Privatization; Ownership and Corporate Performance in the UK, 1997.

Abu Shair, Osama J. A. R. Privatization and Development, 1997.