Fiedeler, Ulrich and Krings, Bettina (2006): Naturalness and Neuronal Implants – Changes in the perception of human beings.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_8501.pdf Download (85kB) | Preview |
Abstract
With our contribution we would like to refer to the debate on nanotechnology (NT) and its implications for the public discourse on the relationship of human beings and technologies. Within NT the convergence of some technologies has been considered as a crucial step towards the long term objective of “enhancing human performance”. The discussion was initiated with an US-American workshop in the year 2002, where the innovative character of converging technology (CT) was strongly underlined (Roco 2002). In the final document of the workshop futuristic and far reaching scenarios on technical development based on NT and on CT were presented. First we address the implications of the mentioned document for research policy in general and especially of NT. Based on the example of neural implants we second qualify the normative expectations within the debate without however denying the helpfulness of these innovations especially in the field of medicine. But we third agree on a critical discussion, which consider a new quality of technological penetration into social and human processes.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Naturalness and Neuronal Implants – Changes in the perception of human beings |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | nanotechnology; innovation; converging technology; medicine; socio-economic implications |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I19 - Other Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q55 - Technological Innovation O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A14 - Sociology of Economics |
Item ID: | 8501 |
Depositing User: | Bettina J. Krings |
Date Deposited: | 28 Apr 2008 14:20 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 05:31 |
References: | Böhme, G., Manzei, A.: Kritische Theorie der Technik und der Natur, München (2003). Coenen, C.: Report on the Conference: Converging Technologies – Promises and Challenges, Budapest, 2005. Technikfolgeabschätzung Theorie und Praxis, Nr 1, (2006), p.110. Coenen, Chr.; Rader, M.; Fleischer, T.: Of visions, dreams and nightmares: The debate on converging technologies (Report on the Conference „Converging Technologies for a Diverse Europe“, Brussels 2004), Technikfolgenabschätzung - Theorie und Praxis 3, (2004), S. 118. Dunkley, R. W. S. Nanotechnology: social consequences and future implications, Futures, 36, (2004), p.1129 Eckmiller, R.: Biosystemtechnologie: Interaktion zwischen biologischen und technischen Systemen, VDI-Bericht, Nr 1886, (2005) Grunwald, A.: Nanotechnologie als Chiffre der Zukunft, In: Nordmann, A.; Schummer, J.; Schwarz, A. (eds.) Nanotechnologien im Kontext: Philosophische, ethische und gesellschaftliche Perspektiven. Berlin Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft (2006) Grunwald, A.: Converging Technologies: visions, increased contingencies of the conditio humana, and search for orientation, Futures, 39 (2007) 380–392. Jones, R. A.L.: Soft Machines: nanotechnology and life, Oxford: University Press (2004). Knapp, G.-A., Wetterer, A. (eds.): Soziale Verortung der Geschlechter. Gesellschaftstheorie und feministische Kritik. Münster, Westfälisches Dampfboot (2001). Krings, B.-J.: Homo Technicus - Wissenschafts- und Technikentwicklung aus Sicht der Feministischen Theorie, Technikfolgenabschätzung - Theorie und Praxis 11(2002)2, Karlsruhe S. 9-20. Habermas, J.: Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur. Auf dem Weg zu einer liberalen Eugenik?, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, (2001). Hüsing, B., Jäncke, L.; and Tag, B. (eds.): Impact Assessment of Neuroimaging, IOS Press, Amsterdam. Mnyusiwalla, A. et al.: Mind the Gap. Science and Ethics in Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology 14, pp. R9-R13; (2003). Moor, J., Weckert, J.: Nanoethics: Assessing the Nanoscale from an ethical point of view, In: D. Baird, A. Nordmann, J. Schummer Eds.: Discovering the Nanoscale, IOS Press Amsterdam 2004. Nicolelis, M. A. L.: Controlling Robots with the Mind, Scientific American, October (2002) Porchazka, A., Mushahwar, V. K. & McCreery, D. B.: Topical Review: Neural Prostheses, Journal of Pysiology 533.1, (2001) p.99. Roco, M.C.: The US National Nanotechnology Initiative after 3 years (2001–2003), Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 6, (2004), p.1. Scheich, E. (eds.): Vermittelte Weiblichkeit. Feministische Wissenschafts- und Gesellschaftstheorie, Hamburg, HIS-Verlagsgesellschaft (1996) Becker-Schmidt, R.: Matrix und Junggesellenmaschine. Identitätslogik in naturwissenschaftlichen Diskursen. In: Ritter, M. (ed.), Bits und Bytes vom Apfel der Erkenntnis. Frauen - Technik - Männer. 8, Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot (1999) S. 16-32. Schummer, J.: “Societal and Ethical Implications of Nanotechnology”: Meanings, Interest Groups, and Social Dynamics, Techné, 8:2, (2004), p.56 Zrenner, E.: Will retinal implants restore vision?, Science 295, (2002), p.1022 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/8501 |