The Real Bottom Line: Benchmarking Performance in Poverty Reduction in Latin America and the Caribbean

Newman, John L. and Azevedo, João Pedro and Saavedra, Jaime and Molina, Ezequiel (2008): The Real Bottom Line: Benchmarking Performance in Poverty Reduction in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Abstract

This paper makes two contributions. First, it carries out an extensive analysis of episodes of poverty changes and documents the empirical distribution of poverty changes. This is useful for providing some context for assessing whether observed changes in poverty that a country may achieve are good, bad or indifferent and for guiding goals that might be set for poverty reduction. Second, the paper proposes and illustrates an approach to take account of country observable characteristics in assessing what constitutes good and poor performance for a specific country. The approach consists of comparing a country’s actual performance to counterfactual distributions generated using quantile regressions. The paper considers four cases where the type of benchmarking approach being proposed helps facilitate a policy dialogue.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Poverty Reduction, Benchmarking, Millennium Development Goals, Economic Growth, Quantile Regression, Latin America and the Caribbean
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C14 - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C21 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty; H - Public Economics > H8 - Miscellaneous Issues; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty

References

Ackland, R., Dowrick, S., Freyens, B., 2007. Measuring Global Poverty: Why PPP Methods Matter.

Adams, R. H., 2004. Economic growth, inequality and poverty: Estimating the growth elasticity of poverty. World Development 32 (12), 1989–2014.

Chen, S., Ravallion, M., 2008. China is poorer than we thought, but no less successful in the fight against poverty. Policy Research working paper ; no. WPS 4621.

Easterly, W., 2007. How the Millennium Development Goals are Unfair to Africa. Brookings Global Economy and Development Working Paper No. 14.

Koenker, R., 2005. Quantile Regression. Cambridge University Press.

Koenker, R., Bassett, G., 1978. Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46 (1), 33–50.

Leipziger, D. M., February 2008. Millennium development goals and africa: An alternative view. PREM Notes 116, 6.

Oehlert, G. W., 1992. A note on the delta method. American Statistician 46, 27U29.

Ravallion, M., 1995. Growth and poverty: Evidence for developing countries in the 1980s. Economics Letters 48 (3-4), 411–17.

Ravallion, M., 2002. How Not to Count the Poor: A Reply to Reddy and Pogge. World Bank. www. worldbank. org/research/workpapers.

Ravallion, M., Chen, S., Sangraula, P., 2008. Dollar a day revisited. Policy Research working paper ; no. WPS 4620.

Reddy, S., Pogge, T., 2002. How not to count the poor. unpublished manuscript, Columbia University.

Reddy, S., Pogge, T., 2003. How Not to Count the Poor!–A Reply to Ravallion.