Shevchenko, Yelena and Stukach, Victor (2017): Foresight in Strategic Planning and Technology Foresight in Kazakhstan: making Decisions about Long-term Investment in Science, International Experience. Published in: Scholars Journal of Economics, Business and Management (SJEBM) e-ISSN 2348-5302 , Vol. 10, No. Economics, Business and Management, 2018, 53 (April 2018): pp. 240-249.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_86216.pdf Download (615kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Development of the national science, technology and innovation (STI) strategy is a complicated process associated with a high level of uncertainty. Establishment of efficient framework for STI policy planning in Kazakhstan is an essential element of the sustainable policy planning system. From a perspective of future management, foresight provides a basis for decision-making process by identifying key areas for a long-term investments and assessing long-term perspectives of science, technology, economy and society. Foresight allows setting up future priorities by focusing on different aspects of anticipated changes. The main purpose of this paper is to investigate the role of foresight in the decision-making process and to elaborate recommendations on effective integration of national foresight results into the process of STI policy planning in Kazakhstan.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Foresight in Strategic Planning and Technology Foresight in Kazakhstan: making Decisions about Long-term Investment in Science, International Experience. |
English Title: | Foresight in Strategic Planning and Technology Foresight in Kazakhstan: making Decisions about Long-term Investment in Science, International Experience. |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | foresight, forecast, future studies, government policies, STI priorities, strategic policy planning, emerging issue analysis, priority setting, S&T program planning, strategic planning system, International Experience foresight. |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O21 - Planning Models ; Planning Policy O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes |
Item ID: | 86216 |
Depositing User: | Виктор Федорович Стукач |
Date Deposited: | 17 Apr 2018 17:50 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 11:26 |
References: | 1. Andersen AD, Andersen PD. Innovation system foresight. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2014 Oct 1;88:276-86. 2. Georghiou L, Keenan M. Evaluation of national foresight activities: Assessing rationale, process and impact. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2006 Sep 1;73(7):761-77. 3. Rohrbeck R, Schwarz JO. The value contribution of strategic foresight: Insights from an empirical study of large European companies. 4. Amanatidou E. Foresight process impacts: Beyond any official targets, foresight is bound to serve democracy. Futures. 2017 Jan 1;85:1-3. 5. Aguirre-Bastos C, Weber MK. Foresight for shaping national innovation systems in developing economies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017 Dec 6. 6. Habegger B. Horizon scanning in government: Concept, country experiences, and models for Switzerland. Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zurich. 2009. 7. Sutherland WJ, Woodroof HJ. The need for environmental horizon scanning. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2009 Oct 1;24(10):523-7. 8. Habegger B. Strategic foresight in public policy: Reviewing the experiences of the UK, Singapore, and the Netherlands. Futures. 2010 Feb 1;42(1):49- 58. 9. Andersen AD, Andersen PD. Foresighting for inclusive development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017 Jun 1;119:227-36. 10. Jeon WS, Ziganshina AY, Lee JW, Ko YH, Kang JK, Lee C, Kim K. A [2] Pseudorotaxane‐Based Molecular Machine: Reversible Formation of a Molecular Loop Driven by Electrochemical and Photochemical Stimuli. Angewandte Chemie. 2003 Sep 5;115(34):4231-4. 11. Kim L. The dynamics of technological learning in industrialisation. International Social Science Journal. 2001 Jun 1;53(168):297-308. 12. European Commission, European Foresight Monitoring Network - Mapping Foresight – Revealing how Europe and other words regions navigate into the future, November, 2009, 10-15. 13. Ananiadou K, Claro M. 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries. 14. Schlossstein D, Park B. Comparing recent technology foresight studies in Korea and China: towards foresight-minded governments?. Foresight. 2006 Nov 1;8(6):48-70. 15. Foresight. A Researcher tool, a basis of formation of the state Strategy Shevchenko, Yelena and Stukach, Victor September (2016). https://mpra.ub.uni- muenchen.de/75177/1/MPRA_paper_75177.pdf. 16. Stukach V. Management of technological development of agriculture: resources for development, institutional environment, state regulation, human resources, innovation market, strategic priorities/Stukach, Victor end Volkova, Inna/Ethnomusicology. 2017. С. 255. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/86216 |