Polemis, Michael (2018): A Mixed Integer Linear Programming Model to Regulate the Electricity Sector.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_86282.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper introduces the concept of market design and make the distinction between the three different levels of market design such as industry structure, wholesale and marketplace design. We present a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model for the optimal long-term electricity planning of the Greek wholesale generation system. In order to capture more accurately the technical characteristics of the problem, we have divided the Greek territory into a number of individual interacted networks (geographical zones). In the next stage we solve the system of equations and provide simulation results for the daily/hourly energy prices based on the different scenarios adopted. The empirical findings reveal an inverted-M shaped curve for electricity demand in Greece, while the SMP curve is also non-linear. Lastly, given the simulations results, we provide the necessary policy implications for government officials, regulators and the rest of the marketers.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | A Mixed Integer Linear Programming Model to Regulate the Electricity Sector |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Electricity market; Linear programming; Constraints; Day-ahead scheduling; Mathematical programming. |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C60 - General L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L94 - Electric Utilities Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q40 - General |
Item ID: | 86282 |
Depositing User: | Dr Michael Polemis |
Date Deposited: | 22 Apr 2018 06:03 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 21:32 |
References: | Clastres C, Khalfallah H, 2015, An analytical approach to activating demand elasticity with a demand response mechanism, Energy Economics, Vol. 52, pp. 195-206 Downward A., D. Young, G. Zakeri, 2016, Electricity retail contracting under risk-aversion, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 251, pp. 846-859 Fiorio, Carlo, and Massimo Florio. (2013). Electricity Prices and Public Ownership: Evidence From the EU15 Over Thirty Years, Energy Economics 39: 222–232. Genc TS, 2016, Measuring demand responses to wholesale electricity prices using market power indices, Energy Economics, Vol. 56, pp. 247–260 Koltsaklis NE, Dagoumas AS, Kopanos GM, Pistikopoulos EN, Georgiadis MC. 2014. A spatial multi-period long-term energy planning model: a case study of the Greek power system. Applied Energy 115:456–82. Koltsaklis NE, Georgiadis MC., 2015, A multi-period, multi-regional generation expansion planning model incorporating unit commitment constraints. Applied Energy, Vol. 158, pp. 310-331 Koltsaklis NE, AS Dagoumas, MC Georgiadis, G Papaioannou and C Dikaiakos, 2016, A mid-term, market-based power systems planning model, Applied Energy, Vol. 179, pp. 17-35 Lu Renzhi., Hong H,S., Zhang X 2018. A dynamic pricing demand response algorithm for smart grid: Reinforcement learning approach, Applied Energy 220: 220-230. Magnago FH, J Alemany and J Lin, 2015, Impact of demand response resources on unit commitment and dispatch in a day-ahead electricity market, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Vol. 68, pp. 142–149 Philpott A.B., M. Craddock, H. Waterer, 2000, Hydro-electric unit commitment subject to uncertain demand, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 125, pp. 410-424 Polemis, M., and A. Dagoumas. (2013). The Electricity Consumption and Economic Growth Nexus: Evidence from Greece, Energy Policy 62: 798-808. Dagoumas, A and Polemis, M. (2017). An integrated model for assessing electricity retailer’s profitability with demand response, Applied Energy, 198(C): 49-64. Wolak, FA. 2011. Do Residential Customers Respond to Hourly Prices? Evidence from a Dynamic Pricing Experiment. American Economic Review, 101(3): 83-87. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/86282 |