Brañas-Garza, Pablo and Bucheli, Marisa and Espinosa, Maria Paz (2018): Altruism and information.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_87089.pdf Download (459kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Experimental literature has accumulated evidence on the association of personal characteristics to a higher or lower level of prosocial behavior. There is also evidence that donations are affected by the mere provision of information about the recipients, whatever its nature or content. In this paper, we present a unified experimental framework to analyze the impact of social class, political orientation and gender on the level of giving; our experimental design allows us to reveal the effect of providing information by itself, with respect to the baseline treatment of no information, and separately from the effect of the informational content. These results could be relevant to any design intended to measure the impact on altruism of different manipulations of the Dictator Game.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Altruism and information |
English Title: | Altruism and information |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | economic experiments, information, wealth, gender, ideology, inequity aversion, giving. |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D64 - Altruism ; Philanthropy I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I30 - General |
Item ID: | 87089 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Pablo Branas-Garza |
Date Deposited: | 12 Jun 2018 12:34 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 17:23 |
References: | Aguiar, F., Brañas-Garza, P., Espinosa, M.P. , Miller, L.M. (2010) Personal identity. A theoretical and experimental analysis, Journal of Economic Methodology 17(3): 261-275. Akerlof, G., Kranton, R.E. (2000). Economics and Identity, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115: 715–753. Anderson, LR, Mellor, J.M. (2009) Religion and cooperation in a public goods experiment. Economics Letters 105(1): 58-60. Andreoni, J., Vesterlund, L. (2001) Which is the fair sex? Gender Differences in Altruism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(1): 293-312. Battigalli, P., & Dufwenberg, M. (2007). Guilt in games. The American Economic Review 97(2):170-176. Bechler, C., Green, L., Myerson, J. (2015) Proportion offered in the Dictator and Ultimatum Games decreases with amount and social distance. Behavioural Processes 115: 149–155. Bohnet, I. Frey, B.S. (1999) Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games: Comment. The American Economic Review 89(1): 335-339. Branas-Garza, P. (2006) Poverty in Dictator Games: Awakening Solidarity, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 60(3): 306-320. Branas-Garza, P., Cobo-Reyes, R. , Espinosa, M.P., Jiménez, N., Kovářík, J., Ponti, G. (2010). Altruism and social integration. Games and Economic Behavior 69(2): 249-257. Branas-Garza, P., Espin, A.M., Neuman , S. (2014) Religious Pro-sociality? Experimental evidence from sample of 766 Spaniards. PLoS ONE 9(8): e104685, 2014, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.e104685. Branas-Garza, P., Rodriguez-Lara, I., Sánchez, A. (2017) Humans expect generosity. Nature Scientific Reports 7. 42446. Branas-Garza, P., Capraro, V., Rascon-Ramirez, E. (2018). Gender differences in altruism on Mechanical Turk: Expectations and actual behaviour, Economics Letters 170: 19-23.. Cabrales, A., Ponti, G. (2015). Social Preferences in P. Branas, A. Cabrales (eds), Experimental Economics I: 87-104, London: Palgrave. Charness, G., Gneezy, U. (2008) What’s in a Name? Anonymity and Social Distance in Dictator and Ultimatum Games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 68, 29–35. Charness, G., Haruvy, E., Sonsino, D. (2007) Social distance and reciprocity: an Internet experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 63: 88–103. Charness, G., Rigotti, L., Rustichini, A. (2007) Individual Behavior and Group Membership, The American Economic Review 97(4): 1340-1352. Chen, Y., Xin Li, S. (2009) Group Identity and Social Preferences. The American Economic Review 99(1): 431-457. Croson, R., Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender Differences in Preferences. Journal of Economic Literature 47(2): 448-74. Dufwenberg, M., Muren, A. (2006) Generosity, anonymity, gender. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 61: 42-49. Eckel, C.C., Grossman, P.J. (1996) The Relative Price of Fairness: Gender Differences in a Punishment Game, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 30(2) (1996), 143–158. Eckel, C.C., Grossman, P.J. (1998) Differences in the Economic Decisions of Men and Women: Experimental Evidence, Handbook of Results in Experimental Economics, C. Plott and V. Smith, eds. (Amsterdam: North-Holland). Eckel, C., Grossman, P.J. (1996) Altruism in anonymous Dictator games, Games and Economic Behaviour 16: 181-191. Eckel, C.C., Grossman, P.J. (2001) Are women less selfish than men? Evidence from dictator experiments. The Economic Journal 108: 726–735. Eckel, C.C., Grossman, P.J. (2004) Giving to secular causes by the religious and nonreligious: An experimental test of the responsiveness of giving to subsidies. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 33(2): 271-289. Eckel, C.C., Grossman, P.J. (2002) Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(4): 281–295. Engel, C. (2011) Dictator Games: A Meta Study, Experimental Economics 14: 583-610. Fehr E., Schmidt K.M. (1999) A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 817-868. Forbes K. F., Zampelli, E.M. (2013) The impacts of religion, political ideology, and social capital on religious and secular giving: evidence from the 2006 Social Capital Community Survey. Applied Economics 45(17): 2481-2490. Forbes K. F., Zampelli, E.M. (2012) Volunteerism. The Influences of Social, Religious, and Human Capital. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 43(2): 227-253. Frohlich, N., Oppenheimer, J., Moore, J. (2001) Some doubts about measuring self-interest using dictator games: the cost of anonymity. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 46: 250–271. Froot, K.A. (1989) Consistent covariance matrix estimation with cross-sectional dependence and heteroskedasticity in financial data, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 24: 333–355. Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., & Smith, V. (1994). Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic behavior, 7(3), 346-380. Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Smith, V.L. (1996) Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games. The American Economic Review 86(3): 653-660. Hoffman, M. (2011) Does Higher Income Make You More Altruistic? Evidence from the Holocaust. The Review of Economics and Statistics 93(3): 876-887. Holm, H., Engseld, P. (2005) Choosing Bargaining Partners—An Experimental Study on the Impact of Information About Income, Status and Gender. Experimental Economics 8(3):183-216. Leider, S., Möbius, M.M., Rosenblat, T., Do, Q. (2009) Directed Altruism and Enforced Reciprocity in Social Networks. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(4): 1815–1851 List, J. A. (2007) On the Interpretation of Giving in Dictator Games, Journal of Political Economy 115(3): 482-93. Pereda, M., Brañas-Garza, P., Rodríguez-Lara, I., Sánchez, A. (2017) The emergence of altruism as a social norm, Nature Scientific Reports 7: 9684. Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., Côté, S., Cheng, B. H., Keltner, D. (2010) Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99(5): 771-784. Rege, M., & Telle, K. (2004). The impact of social approval and framing on cooperation in public good situations. Journal of Public Economics 88(7): 1625-1644. Rogers, W.H. (1993) Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin 13: 19–23. Tajfel, H., Billig, M., Bundy, R. and C. Flament (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology 1(2): 149-178. Zettler, I., Hilbig, B.E. (2010) Attitudes of the Selfless: Explaining political orientation with altruism. Personality and Individual Differences 48(3): 338-342. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/87089 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Altruism and information. (deposited 12 Jun 2018 12:34) [Currently Displayed]