A Comparison of TFP Estimates via Distribution Dynamics: Evidence from Light Manufacturing Firms in Brazil

Mendez-Guerra, Carlos and Gonzales-Rocha, Erick (2018): A Comparison of TFP Estimates via Distribution Dynamics: Evidence from Light Manufacturing Firms in Brazil.

Abstract

This article compares the distribution dynamics of two commonly used TFP estimation frameworks: the control function approach of Levinsohn and Petrin (2003) (LP for short) and the corrected control function approach of Ackerberg et al. (2015) (ACF for short). Using Brazilian firm-level data for the textile and furniture sectors, we estimate the transitional dynamics and long-run equilibrium of the TFP distribution for each framework over the 2003-2009 period. Results of this comparison are as follows. In the textile sector, the distribution dynamics for both frameworks are to some extent qualitatively similar. In the furniture sector, however, the distribution dynamics are largely different. While the LP framework shows relatively less mobility, two convergence clusters in the transition stage, and a bumpy distribution in the long run; the ACF framework shows relatively more backward mobility, a unique convergence cluster in the transition, and a highly symmetric distribution in the long run. In light of these results, the article concludes urging researchers not to rely too heavily on one or the other framework. It seems more appropriate to consider both frameworks for drawing inferences on productivity convergence and dispersion dynamics

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: total factor productivity, control function approach, distribution dynamics, manufacturing firms, Brazil
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O47 - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth ; Aggregate Productivity ; Cross-Country Output Convergence; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O54 - Latin America ; Caribbean

References

Ackerberg, D. A., Caves, K., and Frazer, G. (2015). Identification properties of recent production function estimators. Econometrica, 83(6):2411–2451.

Bartelsman, E., Haltiwanger, J., and Scarpetta, S. (2010). Cross-country and within-country differences in the business climate. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 28(4):368–371.

Caselli, F. (2005). Accounting for cross-country income differences. Handbook of economic growth, 1:679–741.

Dal Bianco, S. (2016). Going clubbing in the eighties: convergence in manufacturing sectors at a glance. Empirical Economics, 50(2):623–659.

Epstein, P., Howlett, P., and Schulze, M.-S. (2003). Distribution dynamics: stratification, polarization, and convergence among OECD economies, 1870–1992.Explorations in Economic History, 40(1):78–97.

Galor, O. (1996). Convergence? inferences from theoretical models. The Economic Journal, pages 1056–1069.

Gonzales-Rocha, E. and Mendez-Guerra, C. (2018). Increasing productivity dispersion in Brazil: Evidence form light manufacturing firms. mimeo.

Hall, R. E. and Jones, C. I. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1):83–116.

Hsieh, C.-T. and Klenow, P. J. (2009). Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4):1403–1448.

Hsieh, C.-T. and Klenow, P. J. (2010). Development accounting. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(1):207–23.

Johnson, P. A. (2000). A nonparametric analysis of income convergence across the US states. Economics Letters, 69(2):219–223.

Johnson, P. A. (2005). A continuous state space approach to convergence by parts.Economics Letters, 86(3):317–321.

Kar, S., Jha, D., and Kateja, A. (2011). Club-convergence and polarization of states: A nonparametric analysis of Post-Reform India, Indian Growth and Development Review, 4(1):53–72.

Magrini, S. (1999). The evolution of income disparities among the regions of the European Union. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 29(2):257–281.

Magrini, S. (2004). Regional (di) convergence. In Handbook of regional and urban economics, volume 4, pages 2741–2796. Elsevier.

Magrini, S. (2009). Why should we analyse convergence using the distribution dynamics approach? Scienze Regionali.

Olley, G. S. and Pakes, A. (1996). The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica, 64(6):1263–1297.

Quah, D. (1993). Galton’s fallacy and tests of the convergence hypothesis. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, pages 427–443.

Quah, D. T. (1997). Empirics for growth and distribution: stratification, polarization, and convergence clubs. Journal of Economic Growth, 2(1):27–59.

Syverson, C. (2004a). Market Structure and Productivity: A Concrete Example. Journal of Political Economy, 112(6):1181–1222.

Syverson, C. (2004b). Product Substitutability and Productivity Dispersion. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(2):534–550.