Formal Informal Interactions: A Simple Chayanov Model

Sengupta, Atanu and De, Sanjoy (2018): Formal Informal Interactions: A Simple Chayanov Model.

Abstract

Needless to say, the topic of formal-informal interaction is well traversed. Several dual economy models have been in operation to understand the dynamics of formalization-or in its popular acronym-development. Development discourse is essentially a way in which the economy becomes increasingly formalised or its operations become visible to the panoptic vision of law and legal institutions. The story is essentially the same. Formalisation raises efficiency and productivity thereby yielding benefit to all concerned. Also it adds to the society’s overall capacity to reproduce and produce itself giving way to future growth and prosperity. The story told and retold many a times fails to capture the reason for continuous existence or even (re)creation of informality even in a world where formality is the sure way to succeed. In an interesting paper Porta and Shleifer (2014) deals with this issue and comes out with an interesting conclusion. The informal sector does not merely exist for taking advantage of legal loopholes. Even if these loopholes are somehow stitched, the informal sector will not become formal. The clue perhaps lies in an old view expressed by Chayanov (though not included in the standard Chayanovian models) that in certain circumstances an informal sector can outperform a modern capitalist sector. This paper is a modest attempt to include this clue in a formal model of the simplest possible type that tries to unravel the relation between formal and informal sector as also the consequences of policies that leads to forced formalisation.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Informal production, formal production, dual economy model, forced formalisation
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O10 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O12 - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O14 - Industrialization ; Manufacturing and Service Industries ; Choice of Technology; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O17 - Formal and Informal Sectors ; Shadow Economy ; Institutional Arrangements

References

Banerjee, Abhijit and Duflo Esther. 2011. Poor Economics: a radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty. New York: Public Affairs.

Basu, Kaushik . 1984. The less Developed Economy: A. Critique of Contemporary Theory, Delhi: Oxford University Press. Delhi.

Bose, Pinaki. 1998. “Formal–informal sector interaction in rural credit markets.” Journal of Development Economics, 56 (2): 265-280.

Business Standard. 2018.Forced formalisation is not healthy. New Delhi: Business Standard Limited. https://www.business-standard.com/article/opinion/forced-formalisation-is-not-healthy-118012201203_1.html (accessed July 11, 2018)

La Porta, Rafael, and Andrei Shleifer. 2014. “Informality and Development.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28 (3): 109-26.

Lewis, W.A. 1954. “Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labor.” The Manchester School, Vol. 22, No.2, pp. 139-191.

Murphy, Kevin; Shleifer and Robert W.Vishny. 1989."Industrialization and the Big Push," Journal of Political Economy 97, no. 5: 1003-1026.

Ranis, G. and Fei, J.C.H. 1961. “A Theory of Economic Development,” American Economic Review, Vol. 51, pp. 533-565.

Ray, Sunil. 2012, “Economics of Solidarity.” Economic and Political Weekly. 47 (24): 39-48.

Ryea, Tom. Moniosb, J. Hrelja, R and Isakssoncd, I. 2018. “The relationship between formal and informal institutions for governance of public transport.” Journal of Transport Geography. 69: 196-206'

Sengupta, Atanu, and De, Sanjoy. 2018. “Fish Out of Water: Setting of the Currency Crisis in India.” Mainstream Weekly. LVI(29).