Greco, Salvatore and Ishizaka, Alessio and Tasiou, Menelaos and Torrisi, Gianpiero (2018): sigmamu efficiency analysis: A new methodology for evaluating units through composite indices.
This is the latest version of this item.

PDF
MPRA_paper_88332.pdf Download (943kB)  Preview 
Abstract
We propose a new methodology to employ composite indicators for performance analysis of units of interest using and extending the family of Stochastic Multiattribute Acceptability Analysis. We start evaluating each unit by means of weighted sums of their elementary indicators in the whole set of admissible weights. For each unit, we compute the mean, �, and the standard deviation, �, of its evaluations. Clearly, the former has to be maximized, while the latter has to be minimized as it denotes instability in the evaluations with respect to the variability of weights. We consider a unit to be ParetoKoopmans efficient with respect to � and � if there is no convex combination of � and � of the rest of the units with a value of � that is not smaller, and a value of � that is not greater, with at least one strict inequality. The set of all ParetoKoopmans efficient units constitutes the first ParetoKoopmans frontier. In the spirit of contextdependent Data Envelopment Analysis, we assign each unit to one of the sequences of ParetoKoopmans frontiers. We measure the local efficiency of each unit with respect to each frontier, but also its global efficiency taking into account all feasible frontiers in the �
Item Type:  MPRA Paper 

Original Title:  sigmamu efficiency analysis: A new methodology for evaluating units through composite indices 
Language:  English 
Keywords:  Data Envelopment Analysis � Composite Indicators � SigmaMu efficiency � Stochastic Multiattribute Acceptability Analysis � neoBenthamite approach. 
Subjects:  C  Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C4  Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics > C43  Index Numbers and Aggregation C  Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C4  Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics > C44  Operations Research ; Statistical Decision Theory I  Health, Education, and Welfare > I3  Welfare, WellBeing, and Poverty > I31  General Welfare, WellBeing 
Item ID:  88332 
Depositing User:  Gianpiero Torrisi 
Date Deposited:  01 Oct 2018 20:45 
Last Modified:  03 Oct 2019 04:39 
References:  Abberger, K., Graff, M., Siliverstovs, B., and Sturm, J.E. (2017). Using rulebased updating procedures to improve the performance of composite indicators. Economic Modelling, 68:127–144. Aertens, W., Kint, V., Van Orshoven, J., and Muys, B. (2011). Evaluation of modelling techniques for forest site productivity prediction in contrasting ecoregions using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA). Environmental Modelling & Software, 26(7):929– 937. Ainslie, G. (2001). Breakdown of will. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. Andersen, P. and Petersen, N. C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management science, 39(10):1261–1264. Angilella, S., Catalfo, P., Corrente, S., Giarlotta, A., Greco, S., and Rizzo, M. (2018). Robust sustainable development assessment with composite indices aggregating interacting dimensions: The hierarchicalSMAAChoquet integral approach. KnowledgeBased Systems, 158:136 – 153. Angilella, S., Corrente, S., and Greco, S. (2015). Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis for the Choquet integral preference model and the scale construction problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(1):172–182. Aragon, Y., Daouia, A., and ThomasAgnan, C. (2003). A Conditional Quantilebased Efficiency Measure. Technical report, Discussion paper, GREMAQ et LSP, Université de Toulouse. Atkinson, A. (2015). Inequality. Harvard University Press. Atkinson, A. B. (1970). On the measurement of inequality. Journal of economic theory, 2(3):244–263. Aumann, R. J. (1962). Utility theory without the completeness axiom. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 445–462. Babbie, E. R. (1995). The practice of social research. Wadsworth Publishing Company. Bandura, R. (2011). Composite Indicators and Rankings: Inventory 2011. Technical report, New York: Oﬃce of Development Studies, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Barro, R. J. and Salai Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of political Economy, 100(2):223–251. Becker,W.,Saisana,M.,Paruolo,P.,andVandecasteele,I.(2017). Weightsandimportancein compositeindicators: Closingthegap. EcologicalIndicators,80:12–22. Bewley, T. F. (2002). Knightian decision theory. Part I. Decisions in Economics and Finance, 25(2):79–110. Blackburn, D. W. and Ukhov, A. D. (2013). Individual vs. aggregate preferences: The case of asmallﬁshinabigpond. ManagementScience,59(2):470–484. Booysen, F. (2002). An overview and evaluation of composite indices of development. Social IndicatorsResearch,59(2):115–151. Boyd, S. and Vandenberghe, L. (2004). Convex optimization. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridgeuniversitypress. Brans,J.P.,Vincke,P.,andMareschal,B.(1986). Howtoselectandhowtorankprojects: The PROMETHEEmethod. EuropeanJournalofOperationalResearch,24(2):228–238. Cazals, C., Florens, J.P., and Simar, L. (2002). Nonparametric frontier estimation: a robust approach. Journalofeconometrics,106(1):1–25. CerreiaVioglio,S.,Giarlotta,A.,Greco,S.,Maccheroni,F.,andMarinacci,M.(2018).Rational preferenceandrationalizablechoice. EconomicTheory. Inprint. Charnes,A.andCooper,W.W.(1962). Programmingwithlinearfractionalfunctionals. Naval ResearchLogistics(NRL),9(34):181–186. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Golany, B., Seiford, L., and Stutz, J. (1985). Foundations of data envelopmentanalysisforParetoKoopmanseﬃcientempiricalproductionfunctions.Journal ofeconometrics,30(12):91–107. Charnes,A.,Cooper,W.W.,and Rhodes,E.(1978).Measuringtheeﬃciencyofdecisionmaking units. EuropeanJournalofOperationalResearch,2(6):429–444. Cherchye,L.,Moesen,W.,Rogge,N.,andPuyenbroeck,V.T.(2007).Anintroductionto‘beneﬁt ofthedoubt’compositeindicators. SocialIndicatorsResearch,82(1):111–145. Chowdhury, S. and Squire, L. (2006). Setting weights for aggregate indices: An application to the commitment to development index and human development index. The Journal of DevelopmentStudies,42(5):761–771. Collard, D. (2006). Research on wellbeing: Some advice from Jeremy Bentham. Philosophy oftheSocialSciences,36(3):330–354. 
URI:  https://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/id/eprint/88332 
Available Versions of this Item

σµ efficiency analysis: A new methodology for evaluating units through composite indices. (deposited 02 Jan 2018 23:06)

σµ efficiency analysis: A new methodology for evaluating units through composite indices. (deposited 06 Aug 2018 19:54)
 sigmamu efficiency analysis: A new methodology for evaluating units through composite indices. (deposited 01 Oct 2018 20:45) [Currently Displayed]

σµ efficiency analysis: A new methodology for evaluating units through composite indices. (deposited 06 Aug 2018 19:54)