Bhan, Aditya and Kabiraj, Tarun (2018): Countering Terror Cells: Offence versus Defence.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_88873.pdf Download (389kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The analysis provides insights regarding the suitability of offensive versus defensive measures in countering a terror cell. It is shown that the optimal allocation is more offensive when the cell is aware of which targets have been protected, but unable to distinguish between the values of different targets; than the case where it can neither distinguish between target values nor is the protection conspicuous. Also, the ability of the terror cell to inflict damage is least when it can neither distinguish between target values nor is the target protection conspicuous, and most when it can observe both target values and protection. Hence, from the counter-terrorism (CT) point of view, there seems to be a rationale in making target values and target protection inconspicuous to the extent possible. The paper finally deals with the possibility of diverging target valuations from the CT standpoint and that of the terror cell, and shows that if target protection is conspicuous to the cell and these are common knowledge, then the optimal CT allocation is at least as offensive as the case with identical valuation rankings.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Countering Terror Cells: Offence versus Defence |
English Title: | Countering Terror Cells: Offence versus Defence |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | : terror cell; offensive and defensive measures; target value, target protection; counter-terrorism. |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C70 - General D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D74 - Conflict ; Conflict Resolution ; Alliances ; Revolutions D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D78 - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F52 - National Security ; Economic Nationalism |
Item ID: | 88873 |
Depositing User: | Professor Tarun Kabiraj |
Date Deposited: | 14 Sep 2018 15:45 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 17:52 |
References: | Arce, Daniel G. and Sandler, Todd (2005): “Counterterrorism: A Game-Theoretic Analysis”, Journal of Conflict Resolution 49 (2), 183-200. Arce, Daniel G. and Sandler, Todd (2007): “Terrorist Signalling and the Value of Intelligence”, British Journal of Political Science 37 (4), 573-586. Bandyopadhyay, Subhayu and Sandler, Todd (2011): “The Interplay Between Preemptive and Defensive Counterterrorism Measures: A Two-stage Game”, Economica 78, 546-564. Barth, James R.; Li, Tong and McCarthy, Don (2006): “Economic Impacts of Global Terrorism: From Munich to Bali”, Milken Institute Research Report. Bier, Vicki; Oliveros, Santiago and Samuelson, Larry (2007): “Choosing What to Protect: Strategic Defensive Allocation against an Unknown Attacker”, Journal of Public Economic Theory 9(4), 563-587. Das, Satya P. and Lahiri, Sajal (2017): “Why Direct Counter-Terror (CT) Measures Only May Fail: An Analysis of Direct and Preventive CT Measures”, Preliminary Draft. Das, Satya P. and Roy Chowdhury, Prabal (2014): “Deterrence, Preemption and Panic: A Common-Enemy Problem of Terrorism”, Economic Enquiry 52 (1), 219-238. Enders, Walter and Jindapon, Paan (2010): “Network Externalities and the Structure of Terror Networks”, Journal of Conflict Resolution 54 (2), 262-280. Enders, Walter and Sandler, Todd (2006): “Distribution of Transnational Terrorism among Countries by Income Class and Geography after 9/11”, International Studies Quarterly 50 (2), 367-393. Enders, Walter and Su, Xuejuan (2007): “Rational Terrorists and Optimal Network Structure”, Journal of Conflict Resolution 51 (1), 33-57. Heal, Sid (2011): “Anti-terrorism vs. Counter-terrorism”, The Tactical Edge, NTOA Publications, 68-70. Li, Quan (2005): “Does Democracy Promote or Reduce Transnational Terrorist Incidents?”, Journal of Conflict Resolution 49 (2), 278-297. Mesquita, Ethan Bueno de (2005): “The Terrorist Endgame: A Model with Moral Hazard and Learning”, Journal of Conflict Resolution 49 (2), 237-258. Mueller, Karl P.; Castillo, Jasen J.; Morgan, Forrest E.; Pegahi, Negeen and Rosen, Brian (2006): “Striking First”, Project Air Force, RAND Corporation. Sandler, Todd (2005): “Collective versus Unilateral Responses to Terrorism”, Public Choice 124 (1/2), 75-93. Sandler, Todd and Siqueira, Kevin (2006): “Global Terrorism: Deterrence versus Pre-emption”, Canadian Journal of Economics 39 (4), 1370-1387. Sandler, Todd and Siqueira, Kevin (2007): “Defensive Counterterrorism Measures and Domestic Politics”, Defence and Peace Economics 19 (6), 405-413. Siqueira, Kevin and Sandler, Todd (2007): “Terrorist Backlash, Terrorism Mitigation, and Policy Delegation”, Journal of Public Economics 91 (9), 1800-1815. Slate (2001): “How Do Terrorist “Cells” Work?”, www.slate.com/news-and-politics/2017/12/today-in-conservative-media-how-obama-colluded-with-russia-and-iran.html. The Free Dictionary by Farlex: “Terrorist Cell”, www.thefreedictionary.com/terrorist+cell. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/88873 |