Besner, Manfred (2018): Player splitting, players merging, the Shapley set value and the Harsanyi set value.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_89201.pdf Download (436kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We discuss a value, proposed in the context of cost allocation by Shapley (1981) and Dehez (2011) and in general by Radzik (2012). This value, we call it Shapley set value, covers the weighted Shapley values all at once. It is defined on weighted TU-games in the form of two constituent parts, a weight system and a classical TU-game, where the weights and the coalition function may vary at the same time. In addition, similar to the Shapley set value, we introduce the Harsanyi set value. It captures all TU-values from the Harsanyi set, called Harsanyi payoffs. A player splitting and a players merging property enable new axiomatizations. Examples recommend both solution concepts for profit distribution and cost allocation.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Player splitting, players merging, the Shapley set value and the Harsanyi set value |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Cost allocation · Profit distribution · Player splitting · Players merging · Shapley set· Harsanyi set |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C70 - General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C71 - Cooperative Games |
Item ID: | 89201 |
Depositing User: | Manfred Besner |
Date Deposited: | 27 Sep 2018 19:16 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 03:33 |
References: | Amer, R., Carreras, F., & Maga˜na, A. (2007). Two Main Methods for Utility Sharing in Joint Business: A Discussion. Journal of Mathematics and Statistics 3(1), 28–35. Banker, R. D. (1981). Equity Considerations in Traditional Full Cost Allocation Practices: An Axiomatic Perspective. Carnegie-Mellon University. Besner, M. (2016). Lösungskonzepte kooperativer Spiele mit Koalitionsstrukturen. Master’s thesis, FernUniversität Hagen, Germany. Besner, M. (2017a). Axiomatizations of the proportional Shapley value. Working paper Béal, S., Ferrières, S., Rémila, E., & Solal, P. (2017). The proportional Shapley value and applications. Games and Economic Behavior. Casajus, A. (2017). Weakly balanced contributions and solutions for cooperative games. Operations Research Letters, 45, 616–619. Dehez, P. (2011). Allocation of fixed costs: characterization of the (dual) weighted Shapley value. International Game Theory Review, 13, 141-157. Derks, J. J., & Haller, H. H. (1999). Null players out? Linear values for games with variable supports. International Game Theory Review, 1(3–4), 301–314. Derks, J., Haller, H., & Peters, H. (2000). The selectope for cooperative games. International Journal of Game Theory, 29(1), 23–38. Gangolly, J. S. (1981). On joint cost allocation: Independent cost proportional scheme (ICPS) and its properties. Journal of Accounting Research, 299–312. Hammer, P. L., Peled, U. N., & Sorensen, S. (1977). Pseudo-boolean functions and game theory. I. Core elements and Shapley value. Cahiers du CERO, 19, 159–176. Harsanyi, J. C. (1959). A bargaining model for cooperative n-person games. In: A. W. Tucker & R. D. Luce (Eds.), Contributions to the theory of games IV (325–355). Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. Hart, S., & Mas-Colell, A. (1989). Potential, value, and consistency. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 589–614. Kalai, E., & Samet, D. (1987). On weighted Shapley values. International Journal of Game Theory 16(3), 205–222. Lehrer, E. (1988). An axiomatization of the Banzhaf value. International Journal of Game Theory, 17(2), 89–99. Myerson, R. B. (1980) Conference Structures and Fair Allocation Rules, International Journal of Game Theory, 9(3), 169–182. Moriarity, S. (1975). Another approach to allocating joint costs, The Accounting Review, 50(4), 791–795. Nowak, A. S., & Radzik, T. (1995). On axiomatizations of the weighted Shapley values. Games and Economic Behavior, 8(2), 389–405. Radzik, T. (2012). A new look at the role of players’ weights in the weighted Shapley value. European Journal of Operational Research, 223(2), 407–416. Shapley, L. S. (1953a). Additive and non-additive set functions. Princeton University. Shapley, L. S. (1953b). A value for n-person games. H. W. Kuhn/A. W. Tucker (eds.), Contributions to the Theory of Games, Vol. 2, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 307–317. Shapley, L. S. (1981). Discussion comments on ”Equity considerations in traditional full cost allocation practices: an axiomatic approach”, in: Moriarity S. (Ed.), Joint Cost Allocation, Proceeding of the University of Oklahoma Conference on Costs Allocations, April 1981, Centre for Economic and Management Research, University of Oklahoma, 131–136. Vasil’ev, V. A. (1978). Support function of the core of a convex game. Optimizacija Vyp, 21, 30-35. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/89201 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Player splitting, players merging, the Shapley set value and the Harsanyi set value. (deposited 07 Jun 2018 09:02)
- Player splitting, players merging, the Shapley set value and the Harsanyi set value. (deposited 27 Sep 2018 19:16) [Currently Displayed]