Does routinization affect occupation dynamics? Evidence from the ‘Italian O*Net’ data

Guarascio, Dario and Gualtieri, Valentina and Quaranta, Roberto (2018): Does routinization affect occupation dynamics? Evidence from the ‘Italian O*Net’ data.

Abstract

Taking advantage of a dataset providing O*Net-type information on the task content of Italian occupations, this work analyses empirically if and to what extent employment patterns are affected by task characteristics in terms of ‘relative routinarity’. The investigation focuses on the 2005-2016 period relying on a panel including all Italian 4-digit occupations. Occupations characterized by relatively large shares of routinary tasks are penalized in terms of employment dynamics. This result proves to be robust despite the inclusion of a large number of worker, occupation and industry-level controls. A considerable heterogeneity between manufacturing and services is highlighted. While in services the negative relationship between routine task and employment is verified, in manufacturing the same relationship becomes statistically weak. Moreover, Italian occupations with high level of routinary tasks seems to get ‘younger’ rather than ‘older’. According to our empirical results, in highly routinary occupations youth employment tends to grow rather than shrink. Finally, being in highly routinary occupations seems to be less an issue for workers with college degree given the weaker significance of the RTI coefficient as compared to the whole sample model.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: polarisation, technological change, occupations
• Subjects: J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J24 - Human Capital ; Skills ; Occupational Choice ; Labor Productivity

References

Acemoglu, D. and Restrepo, P. (2018). The Race between Man and Machine: Implications of Technology for Growth, Factor Shares, and Employment. American Economic Review, 108(6), 1488-1542.

Arntz, M., Gregory, T. and Zierahn, U. (2016). The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers

Autor, D., Katz, L. F. and Kearney, M. (2006). Measuring and interpreting trends in economic inequality. In AEA Papers and Proceedings (Vol. 96, No. 2, pp. 189-194).

Autor, D. and Dorn, D. (2009). The Skill Content of Jobs and the Evolution of the Wage Structure-This Job is" Getting Old": Measuring Changes in Job Opportunities using Occupational Age Structure. American Economic Review, 99(2), 45.

Autor, D. (2013) The “task approach” to labor markets: an overview Journal for Labour Market Research 46: 185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12651-013-0128-z

Autor, D. and Dorn, D. (2013). The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market. American Economic Review, 103(5), 1553-97.

Autor, D. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3-30.

Böckerman, P., Laaksonen, S. and Vainiomäki, J. (2016). Are Jobs More Polarized in ICT Firms?. IZA working paper

Bogliacino, F. and Lucchese, M. (2015). Endogenous skill biased technical change: testing for demand pull effect. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(2), 227-243.

Bound, J. and G. Johnson (1992), Changes in the Structure of Wages in the 1980`s: An Evaluation of Alternative Explanations, American Economic Review, n.82, pp. 371-92

Braverman, H. (1974). Labor and monopoly capital. New York: Monthly Review.

Calligaris, S., Del Gatto, M., Hassan, F., Ottaviano, G. I. and Schivardi, F. (2016). Italy’s productivity conundrum. a study on resource misallocation in Italy (No. 030). Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.

Cirillo, V. (2016). Employment polarisation in European industries. International Labour Review.

Cirillo, V. and Guarascio, D. (2015). Jobs and competitiveness in a polarised Europe. Intereconomics, 50(3), 156-160.

Cirillo, V., Fana, M. and Guarascio, D. (2017). Labour market reforms in Italy: Evaluating the effects of the Jobs Act. Economia Politica, 34(2), 211-232.

Fernández-Macías, E. and Hurley, J. (2016). Routine-biased technical change and job polarization in Europe. Socio-Economic Review, 15(3), 563-585.

Goldin, C. and Katz, L. F. (2018). The race between education and technology. In Inequality in the 21st Century (pp. 49-54). Routledge.

Goos, M. and Manning, A. (2007). Lousy and Lovely Jobs: The Rising Polarization of Work in Britain. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 118-133.

Gualtieri, V., Guarascio, D. and Quaranta, R. (2018). Routine tasks and the dynamics of Italian employment. INAPP Policy brief, 7/2018.

Katz, L. and Murphy, K. M. (1992). Changes in relative wages, 1963–1987: supply and demand factors. The quarterly journal of economics, 107(1), 35-78.

Katz, L. (1999). Changes in the wage structure and earnings inequality. In Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 3, pp. 1463-1555). Elsevier.

Lucchese, M., Nascia, L. and Pianta, M. (2016). Industrial policy and technology in Italy. Economia e politica industriale, 43(3), 233-260.

Marcolin, L., Miroudot, S. and Squicciarini, M. (2018) To be (routine) or not to be (routine), that is the question: a cross-country task-based answer. Industrial and Corporate Change, https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty020

Michaels, G., Natraj, A. and Van Reenen, J. (2014). Has ICT polarized skill demand? Evidence from eleven countries over twenty-five years. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(1), 60-77.

Spitz-Oener, A. (2006). Technical change, job tasks, and rising educational demands: Looking outside the wage structure. Journal of labor economics, 24(2), 235-270.

Vivarelli, M. (2014). Innovation, employment and skills in advanced and developing countries: A survey of economic literature. Journal of Economic Issues, 48(1), 123-154.