Kayis-Kumar, Ann (2018): Implementing corporate tax cuts at the expense of neutrality? A legal and optimisation analysis of fundamental reform in practice. Published in: eJournal of Tax Research , Vol. 16, No. 1 (September 2018): pp. 201-235.
This is the latest version of this item.
PDF
MPRA_paper_89769.pdf Download (1MB) |
Abstract
Governments and policy-makers are increasingly faced with the trade-off of protecting their tax revenue bases while maintaining their international competitiveness. This is exemplified by the international trend of jurisdictions reducing their headline corporate tax rates, which is often justified on the basis that these cuts will lead to improved efficiency and integrity outcomes. This article explores whether it is more efficient to implement corporate tax cuts or an alternative reform such as an economic rent tax which may better achieve the tax policy goals of efficiency and integrity.
In doing so, this article bridges the gap between applied legal research, economic theory and practical optimisation modelling. Specifically, this research presents a simulation analysis of the behavioural responses of a tax-minimising multinational enterprise to both existing and proposed tax regimes and compares efficiency and integrity outcomes upon implementing corporate tax cuts. This is complemented by a legal comparative analysis featuring case studies of an economic rent tax; namely, the Allowance for Corporate Equity (ACE) as introduced in Belgium and Italy. These case studies will focus on the political hurdles to implementing and sustaining these reforms, which will highlight key lessons learnt from the implementation of the ACE in practice.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Implementing corporate tax cuts at the expense of neutrality? A legal and optimisation analysis of fundamental reform in practice |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Tax neutrality, Corporate tax reform, Allowance for Corporate Equity |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C61 - Optimization Techniques ; Programming Models ; Dynamic Analysis H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue K - Law and Economics > K3 - Other Substantive Areas of Law > K34 - Tax Law |
Item ID: | 89769 |
Depositing User: | Dr Ann Kayis-Kumar |
Date Deposited: | 06 Nov 2018 15:00 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 15:42 |
References: | Alan Auerbach, Michael Devereux and Helen Simpson, ‘Taxing Corporate Income’, in Stuart Adam, Tim Besley, Richard Blundell, Stephen Bond, Robert Chote, Malcolm Gammie, Paul Johnson, Gareth Myles and James M Poterba (eds), Dimensions of Tax Design: The Mirrlees Review, Vol 1 (Oxford University Press, 2010) 837 Alessandra Staderini, ‘Tax Reforms to Unfluence Corporate Financial Policy: The Case of the Italian Business Tax Reform of 1997-98’ (Banca D’Italia Working Paper No 423, November 2001); Silvia Giannini, ‘Le riforme italiane nella tassazione di impresa negli anni ’90 in una prospettiva europea’ (Paper presented at Seminario di Economia Pubblica Istituto di Economia e Finanza, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 22 February 2001); Alessandro Santoro, ‘Ex-post Evaluation of Tax Reforms: The Case of the Italian Partial Ace’, 2005 (unpublished paper, University of Milano-Bicocca). Alex Raskolnikov, ‘Accepting the Limits of Tax Law and Economics’ (2013) 98(3) Cornell Law Review 523, 551; Alexander D Klemm, ‘Allowances for Corporate Equity in Practice’ (IMF Working Paper WP/06/259, November 2006). Alexander Ljungqvist and Michael Smolyansky, ‘To Cut or Not to Cut? On the Impact of Corporate Taxes on Employment and Income’ (NBER Working Paper No 20753, National Bureau of Economic Research, December 2014) André Decoster, Marcel Gerard and Christian Valenduc, ‘A Decade of Tax Cuts’, in Etienne de Callataÿ and Françoise Thys-Clément (eds), The Return of the Deficit: Public Finance in Belgium over 2000-2010 (Leuven University Press, 2012) 95, 111-112. Ann Kayis-Kumar, ‘International Tax Planning by Multinationals: Simulating a Tax-Minimising Intercompany Response to the OECD’s Recommendation on BEPS Action 4’ (2016) 31(2) Australian Tax Forum 363 Ann Kayis-Kumar, ‘Taxing Cross-Border Intercompany Transactions: Are Financing Activities Fungible?’ (2015) 30(3) Australian Tax Forum 627. Ann Kayis-Kumar, ‘Thin Capitalisation Rules: A Second-Best Solution to the Cross-Border Debt Bias?’ (2015) 30(2) Australian Tax Forum 299 Ann Kayis-Kumar, ‘What’s BEPS Got to Do with It? Exploring the Effectiveness of Thin Capitalisation Rules’ (2016) 14(2) eJournal of Tax Research 359. Antonella Caiumi, Lorenzo Di Biagio and Marco Rinaldi, ‘Corporation Tax in Italy: Evidence from Tax Return Data’ (2013), available at: https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/conference/download.cgi?db_name=IIPF69&paper_id=460. Australia’s Future Tax System Review Panel (Dr Ken Henry, chair), Australia’s Future Tax System: Report to the Treasurer (December 2009) (Henry Review); Menezes, above n 35, 5. Catherine Ikin and Alfred Tran, ‘Corporate Tax Strategy in the Australian Dividend Imputation System’ (2013) 28(3) Australian Tax Forum 523. Christian Keuschnigg, ‘The Design of Capital Income Taxation: Reflections on the Mirrlees Review’ (2011) 32(3) Fiscal Studies 437; Daniel Shaviro, ‘Should Corporate Tax Reform Efforts Emphasize an “Allowance for Corporate Equity” (ACE)?’; available at: http://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/ECM_PRO_068214.pdf. Daniel Shaviro, ‘Why Worldwide Welfare as a Normative Standard in US Tax Policy?’ (2007) 60(3) Tax Law Review 155. Daniela Federici and Valentino Parisi, ‘Corporate Taxation and Exports’ (MPRA Paper No 41012, 3 September 2012). David A Weisbach, ‘The Use of Neutralities in International Tax Policy’ (University of Chicago Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper No 697, 18 August 2014) 14-19. Dean Hanlon, ‘Thin Capitalisation Legislation and the Australia/United States Double Tax Convention: Can They Work Together?’ (2000) 3(1) Journal of Australian Taxation 4. Ernesto Zangari, ‘Addressing the Debt Bias: A Comparison between the Belgian and the Italian ACE Systems’ (European Commission Taxation Papers, Working Paper No 44, July 2014) 49. European Commission, ‘The Economic Impact of the Commission Recommendation on Withholding Tax Relief Procedures and the FISCO Proposals’ (European Commission Staff Working Document, 24 June 2009) 44. Filippo Oropallo and Valentino Parisi, ‘Will Italy’s Tax Reform Reduce The Corporate Tax Burden? A Microsimulation Analysis’ (SIEP Working Paper No 403, May 2005); Flavio M Menezes, ‘The Business Tax Reform Agenda’ (2012) 31(1) Economic Papers 3, 4. Francesco Avella, ‘Italy: Treaty Withholding Rates Table’ (1 February 2016), IBFD Country Analyses, Individual Taxation, section 7.4.1.5. Graeme Cooper, ‘Implementing an Allowance for Corporate Equity’ (2012) 27(2) Australian Tax Forum 241. Harry Grubert and Rosanne Altshuler, ‘Corporate Taxes in the World Economy: Reforming the Taxation of Cross-Border Income’ in John Diamond and George Zodrow (eds), Fundamental Tax Reform: Issues, Choices, and Implications (MIT Press, 2008) 319, 319-321. Howard Liebman, ‘International Tax Planning: Belgium Is Taking Steps to Enhance Its Attractiveness’, Jones Day Commentary (July 2005), available at: http://www.jonesday.com/international-tax-planning-belgium-is-taking-steps-to-enhance-its-attractiveness-07-26-2005/. Institute for Fiscal Studies, Equity for Companies: A Corporation Tax for the 1990s, Fourth report of the IFS Capital Taxes Group, Commentary No 26 (Chameleon Press, 1991), available at: http://www.ifs.org.uk/comms/comm26.pdf. Institute for Fiscal Studies, The Structure and Reform of Direct Taxation: Report of a Committee chaired by Professor J E Meade (George Allen & Unwin, 1978). International Monetary Fund, ‘Italy: 2013 Article IV Consultation’ (IMF Country Report No 13/298, September 2013), available at: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2013/cr13298.pdf. James R Hines, Jr, ‘Reconsidering the Taxation of Foreign Income’ (2009) 62(2) Tax Law Review 269, 279. Jan Široký, ‘There are several factors, which influence the actual range of the corporate tax: the relation between the personal income tax and the corporate income tax’ (2006) 5, available at: http://kvf.vse.cz/storage/1168944278_sb_siroky.pdf. Jaroslav Brada and Tomáš Buus, ‘Detection of Possible Tax-Evasive Transfer Pricing in Multinational Enterprises’ (2009) 4(2) European Financial and Accounting Journal 65 John Diamond, George Zodrow and Robert Carroll, ‘Macroeconomic Effects of Lower Corporate Income Tax Rates Recently Enacted Abroad’ (Ernst & Young Report, Prepared for the Reforming America’s Taxes Equitably (RATE) Coalition, March 2013) 18. John Isaac, ‘A Comment on the Viability of the Allowance for Corporate Equity’ (1997) 18(3) Fiscal Studies 303. Jörg Hülshorst, Maximilian Tenberge, Svetlana Kuzmina, Alexander Hoß and Andreas Westermaier, ‘Germany - Transfer Pricing Implications of Action 4 under the OECD’s BEPS Initiative’ (2016) 23(2) International Transfer Pricing Journal 128, 131. Kalok Chan, Vicentiu Covrig and Lilian Ng, ‘What Determines the Domestic Bias and Foreign Bias? Evidence from Mutual Fund Equity Allocations Worldwide’ (2005) 60(3) Journal of Finance 1495; Menezes, above n 35, 4. Kevin S Markle and Douglas A Shackelford, ‘Cross-Country Comparisons of the Effects of Leverage, Intangible Assets, and Tax Havens on Corporate Income Taxes’ (2012) 65(3) Tax Law Review 415, 417-432. Lena Hiort af Ornäs Leijon, ‘Tax policy, economic efficiency and the principle of neutrality from a legal and economic perspective’ (Uppsala Faculty of Law, Working Paper 2015:2) 17. Lothar Lammersen and Robert Schwager R, The Effective Tax Burden of Companies in European Regions: An International Comparison, ZEW Economic Studies Vol 28 (Springer, 2006) 75. Luigi Bernardi, ‘Some Issues on the Italian Tax Reforms and the European Tax Environment: Introductory Remarks’ (Società Italiana di Economia Pubblica, Working Paper No 457, September 2005). M A Vasarhelyi and D Moon, ‘Optimizing Tax Allocation among Countries in the Multinational Entity: A Tale of Many Contingencies’ (Presentation delivered at the TTN Taxation Seminar New York 2011, Morgan Lewis Bockius LLP, New York, 16 May 2011) 6. Malcolm Gammie, ‘Corporate Tax Harmonization, An “ACE” Proposal: Harmonizing European Corporate Taxation through an Allowance for Corporate Equity’ (1991) 31(8) European Taxation 238. Marc Hooghe, ‘The Political Crisis in Belgium (2007-2011): A Federal System without Federal Loyalty’ (2012) 48(1) Representation 131. Marc Quaghebeur, ‘Belgium Removes Obstacle to Risk Capital Deduction’, Worldwide Tax Daily 229-3 (30 November 2005). Marc Quaghebeur, ‘Belgium Targets Risk Capital Deduction Abuses’ (2007) 48 Tax Notes International 627. Belgium introduced this regime in 1982, which aimed at providing MNEs with a tax-effective vehicle to coordinate and centralise their management and financial services in so-called ‘coordination centres’. Marcel Gérard, ‘Belgium Moves to Dual Allowance for Corporate Equity’ (2006) 46(4) European Taxation 156; Marta Božina Beroš and Marin Beroš, ‘Fairness through Regulation? Reflections on a Cosmopolitan Approach to Global Finance’ (2013) 7(1) The Journal of Philosophical Economics 2 Michael Devereux and Harold Freeman, ‘A General Neutral Profits Tax’ (1991) 12(3) Fiscal Studies 1. Michael J Graetz, ‘Taxing International Income: Inadequate Principles, Outdated Concepts, and Unsatisfactory Policies’ (2001) 54(3) Tax Law Review 261 Michael Keen and John King, ‘The Croatian Profit Tax: An ACE in Practice’ (2002) 23(3) Fiscal Studies 401, 417. Michael P Devereux and Peter B Sørensen, ‘The Corporate Income Tax: International Trends and Options for Fundamental Reform’ (European Commission Economic Paper 264, December 2006). Michael Porter and Mark Kramer, ‘Creating Shared Value’ (2011) 89(1/2) Harvard Business Review 62. Mihir A Desai, Testimony before the US Senate Committee on Finance and the US House Committee on Ways and Means (13 July 2011) 4, available at: http://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/DesaiTestimonyFinal.pdf. Mike Lane, ‘Autumn Statement 2016: The Impact on Multinationals’ (2016) 1333 Tax Journal 10. Neil Warren, ‘Modelling the Economic Outcomes from TVM: Is It Practical and Meaningful?’ in Yuri Grbich and Neil Warren (eds), Tax Value Method Consultative Conference, 23-24 July 2001 (Australian Tax Research Foundation, 2001), 197-215. OECD, Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (OECD Publishing, 2013). OECD, BEPS Action 4: Interest Deductions and Other Financial Payments: Public Discussion Draft, 18 December 2014-6 February 2015 (OECD, 2014) 47. OECD, Fundamental Reform of Corporate Income Tax, OECD Tax Policy Studies No 16 (OECD Publishing, 2007) 88, 139. OECD, Public Discussion Draft, BEPS Actions 8, 9 and 10: Discussion Draft on Revisions to Chapter I of the Transfer Pricing Guidelines (Including Risk, Recharacterisation and Special Measures), 1 December 2014 – 6 February 2015 (OECD, 2014) 38. OECD, Reforming Corporate Income Tax, OECD Observer: Policy Brief (2008). OECD, Tax Policy Reform and Economic Growth, OECD Tax Policy Studies No 20 (OECD Publishing, 2010) 54. P Bosi and M C Guerra, ‘Lezione 1: Scienza delle finanze II – CLEP’ (2006); available at: https://slideplayer.it/slide/570656/. P Sankara Iyer, Operations Research (Tata McGraw-Hill, 2008) 3. Paolo Panteghini, Maria Laura Parisi and Francesca Pighetti, ‘Italy’s ACE Tax and Its Effect on a Firm’s Leverage’ (Economics Ejournal Discussion Paper No 2012-31, 2 June 2012), available at: http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2012-31. Patrick A A Vanhaute, Belgium in International Tax Planning (IBFD Publications, 2nd ed, 2008) 91-92, 159. Peter B Sørensen, ‘Can Capital Income Taxes Survive? And Should They?’ (2007) 53(2) CESifo Economic Studies 172 Peter Birch Sørensen and Shane Matthew Johnson, ‘Taxing Capital Income: Options for Reform in Australia’ in Melbourne Institute (ed), Australia’s Future Tax and Transfer Policy Conference, Proceedings of a Conference (Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, 2010) 179, 187. Philip Du Caju, François Rycx and Ilan Tojerow, ‘Wage Structure Effects of International Trade in a Small Open Economy: The Case of Belgium’ (2012) 148(2) Review of World Economics 297. Philipp Genschel and Peter Schwarz, ‘Tax Competition: A Literature Review’ (2011) 9(2) Socio-Economic Review 339, 364. Rachel Griffith, James R Hines, Jr and Peter Birch Sørensen, ‘International Capital Taxation’, in Stuart Adam, Tim Besley, Richard Blundell, Stephen Bond, Robert Chote, Malcolm Gammie, Paul Johnson, Gareth Myles and James M Poterba (eds), Dimensions of Tax Design: The Mirrlees Review, Vol 1 (Oxford University Press, 2010) 914. Reuven S Avi-Yonah and Haiyan Xu, ‘Evaluating BEPS: A Reconsideration of the Benefits Principle and Proposal for UN Oversight’ (2016) 6(2) Harvard Business Law Review 185, 217. Review of Business Taxation (John Ralph, chair), An International Perspective: Discussion Paper, Examining How Other Countries Approach Business Taxation (December 1998) 107 (‘International Taxation’). Robin Boadway and Neil Bruce, ‘A General Proposition on the Design of a Neutral Business Tax’ (1984) 24(2) Journal of Public Economics 231. Ruud A de Mooij and Michael P Devereux, ‘An Applied Analysis of ACE and CBIT Reforms in the EU’ (2011) 18(1) International Tax and Public Finance 93, 96. Ruud A de Mooij and Sjef Ederveen, ‘Corporate Tax Elasticities: A Reader’s Guide to Empirical Findings’ (2008) 24(4) Oxford Review of Economic Policy 680, 696. Ruud de Mooij and Michael Devereux, ‘Alternative Systems of Business Tax in Europe: An Applied Analysis of ACE and CBIT Reforms’ (European Union Taxation Papers, Working Paper No 17, 2009). S Bond, ‘Company Tax Issues’ (Presentation delivered to The Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2006). Steffen Ganghof, ‘The Politics of Tax Structure’ (MPIfG Working Paper 06/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, January 2006) 26-27. Stephen R Bond and Michael P Devereux, ‘On the Design of a Neutral Business Tax under Uncertainty’ (1995) 58(1) Journal of Public Economics 57. Susan C Stokes, Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America (Cambridge University Press, 2001). Theodore P Seto, ‘Four Principles of Optimal Tax System Design’ (Legal Studies Paper No 2008-36, Loyola Law School, March 2013) 5-6. Veronika Daurer and Richard Krever, ‘Choosing between the UN and OECD Tax Policy Models: An African Case Study’ (2014) 22(1) African Journal of International and Comparative Law 1, 15. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/89769 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Implementing corporate tax cuts at the expense of neutrality? A legal and optimisation analysis of fundamental reform in practice. (deposited 30 Oct 2018 08:44)
- Implementing corporate tax cuts at the expense of neutrality? A legal and optimisation analysis of fundamental reform in practice. (deposited 06 Nov 2018 15:00) [Currently Displayed]