Why are some online courses more open than others?

Jacqmin, Julien (2018): Why are some online courses more open than others?

Abstract

This paper studies the determinants of the intellectual property license of the Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) provided on a French platform. While they can opt for a traditional intellectual property right license, the vast majority chooses among creative commons licenses. Considering the ordering in terms of degree of openness of these licenses, we study the course-, teacher- and institution-related factors driving this decision. We observe that the field of study of the course and the characteristics of the institution providing the course play a role. We explain this result by the teachers' variable awareness and preferences with regard to open practices. We also find support for the idea that those willing to raise revenues by selling goods complementary to the MOOC (e.g. a textbook, certificate of completion or bundle of courses) are less likely to choose an open license.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Massive Open Online Courses, intellectual property rights license, creative commons, open educational resources
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I29 - Other; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L17 - Open Source Products and Markets; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O34 - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital

References

ANDREOLI-VERSBACH, P. AND F. MUELLER-LANGER, “Open access to data: An ideal professed but not practised,” Research Policy 43 (2014), 1621–1633.

BAZEN, S., L. BOUVARD AND J. ZIMMERMAN, “Musicians and the Creative Commons: A survey of artists on Jamendo,” Information Economics and Policy 32 (2015), 65–76.

BELLEFLAMME, P. AND J. JACQMIN, “An economic appraisal of MOOC platforms: Business models and impacts on higher education,” CESifo Economic Studies (2016), 148–169.

CASTANA MUNOZ, J., Y. PUNIE, A. INAMORATO DOS SANTOS, M. MITIC AND R. MORAIS, “How are higher education institutions dealing with Openness,” Technical Report, JRC science for policy report, 2016. CREATIVE COMMONS, “www.creativecommons.org, last checked: 22 October 2018,” (2018).

DANIEL, J., “Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility,” Journal of interactive Media in education 3 (2012).

DASGUPTA, P. AND P. DAVID, “Toward a new economics of science,” Research Policy 23 (1994), 487–521.

EGER, T., M. SCHEUFEN AND MEIERRIEKS, “The determinants of open access publishing: survey evidence from Germany,” European Journal of law and economics 39 (2015), 475–503.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION, “on a renewed EU agenda for higher education,” Communication from the Commission to the European Parliamant, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions COM(2017) 247 final, European Commission, 2017.

GOODMAN, J., J. MELKERS AND A. PALLAIS, “Can online delivery increase access to education?,” Journal of Labor Economics 37 (2019).

HOLMSTROM, B., “Managerial incentive problems: A dynamic perspective,” Review of Economic Studies 66 (1999), 169–182.

HYLEN, J., D. VAN DAMME, F. MULDER AND S. D ANTONI, “Open educational resources: Analysis of responses to the OECD country questionnaire,” OECD Publishing (2012).

JACQMIN, J., “Providing MOOCs: A fun way to enroll students?,” Information Economics and Policy (2018).

KAATRAKOSKI, H., A. LITTLEJOHN AND N. HOOD, “Learning challenges in higher education: An analysis of contradictions within Open Educational Practice,” Higher education 74 (2017), 599–615.

LERNER, J. AND J. TIROLE, “Some simple economics of open source,” Journal of industrial economics 50 (2002), p. 197–234.

LERNER, J. AND J. TIROLE, “The Scope of Open Source Licensing,” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 21 (2005), 20–56.

LIEBERMAN, M., Feds Come Around to OER – Slowly (Inside Higher Ed, 2018).

MIGHELI, M. AND G. B. RAMELLO, “Open access, social norms and publication choice,” European Journal of law and economics 35 (2013), 149–167.

MISHRA, S., “Open educational resources: removing barriers from within,” Distance education 38 (2017), 369–380.

MURPHY, A., “Open educational practices in higher education: Institutional adoption and challenges,” Distance education 34 (2013), 201–217.

ROACH, M. AND H. SAUERMANN, “A taste for science? PhD scientists academic orientation and self-selection into research careers in industry,” Research Policy 39 (2010), 422–434.

THURSBY, J., A. FULLER AND M. THURSBY, “US faculty patenting: Inside and outside the university,” Research Policy 38 (2009), 14–25.

VANBRABANT, B., La propriété intellectuelle - Nature juridique, volume 1 (Larcier, 2016).

ZHU, Y., “Who support open access publishing? Gender, discipline, seniority and other factors associated with academics’ OA practice,” Scientometrics 111 (2017), 557–579.