Nawo, Larissa and Njangang, Henri (2018): Co-investments and African infrastructure deficit: Understanding and mitigating political risks in Conflicts Affected and Fragile States.
PDF
MPRA_paper_90295.pdf Download (1MB) |
Abstract
This article through a qualitative assessment identifies political risks confronted by FDI in infrastructures project in African Conflicts Affected and Fragile (CAF) States and studies the structure for infrastructures financing which allows lessening political risks. Outside hydrocarbon sector which remains attractive even in a worse political context, African CAF regions infrastructures sector as other sectors remain unattractive to foreign investors. By considering global investors’ weak preferences for CAF countries infrastructures assets, due to high levels of political risks, we argue that: to fill the CAF States’ infrastructure gap and addressing at the same time political risks concern, an optimal solution is located in a strategic tricky balance between African SWFs as kick-started, Multi-Development Banks (MDBs) (like MIGA agency under the World Bank Group) and long-term institutional investors like foreign SWFs. In the initial phase, MDBs with both their flexibility and experience ought to help finance the riskiest phases of infrastructure projects after African SWFs have to identified bankable projects. In the second period, MDBs ought to disengage and transfer their mature green infrastructure projects to secure the path for a workable involvement of long-term institutional investors such as sovereign wealth funds. With the aim to foster a vast African infrastructure bonds’ markets in which the African CAF States could play a pivotal role, strengthening rules of law (regulatory and legal frames) should begin straightaway
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Co-investments and African infrastructure deficit: Understanding and mitigating political risks in Conflicts Affected and Fragile States |
English Title: | Co-investments and African infrastructure deficit: Understanding and mitigating political risks in Conflicts Affected and Fragile States |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Sovereign wealth Funds, Africa, CAF States, Political risks, infrastructure financing, co-investments, Multi-Development Banks (MDBs) |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency ; Cost-Benefit Analysis D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D74 - Conflict ; Conflict Resolution ; Alliances ; Revolutions G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G32 - Financing Policy ; Financial Risk and Risk Management ; Capital and Ownership Structure ; Value of Firms ; Goodwill H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H13 - Economics of Eminent Domain ; Expropriation ; Nationalization H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H54 - Infrastructures ; Other Public Investment and Capital Stock O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O55 - Africa |
Item ID: | 90295 |
Depositing User: | Mr Henri Njangang Ndieupa |
Date Deposited: | 30 Nov 2018 07:06 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 22:56 |
References: | Agarwal, S. and Hauswald, R. B. (2008). The choice between arm’s-length and relationship debt: Evidence from eloans. Amoako-Tuffour, J. (2016). Should countries invest resource revenues abroad when demands for public infrastructure are pressing at home? the dilemma of sovereign wealth funds in sub- saharan africa. Journal of African Economies, 25(suppl_2):ii41–ii58. Arezki, R. and Sy, A. (2016). Financing africa’s infrastructure deficit: From development banking to long-term investing. Journal of African Economies, 25(suppl_2):ii59–ii73. Bhattacharya, A., Romani, M., and Stern, N. (2012). Infrastructure for development: meeting the challenge. In Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, Londres. www. cccep. ac.uk/Publications/Policy/docs/PP-infrastructure-for-development-meeting-the-challenge. pdf. Consultadoel, volume 15. Chivvis, C. S. (2013). Toppling Qaddafi: Libya and the limits of liberal intervention. Cambridge University Press. Collier, P., Hoeffler, A., and Söderbom, M. (2008). Post-conflict risks. Journal of Peace Research, 45(4):461–478. Della Croce, R. and Yermo, J. (2013). Institutional investors and infrastructure financing. Fitzpatrick, M. (1983). The definition and assessment of political risk in international business: A review of the literature. Academy of Management Review, 8(2):249–254. Grimsey, D. and Lewis, M. K. (2002). Evaluating the risks of public private partnerships for infrastructure projects. International journal of project management, 20(2):107–118. Härle, P., Lüders, E., Pepanides, T., Pfetsch, S., Poppensieker, T., and Stegemann, U. (2010). Basel iii and european banking: Its impact, how banks might respond, and the challenges of implementation. EMEA Banking, pages 16–17. Hove, S. et al. (2016). Sovereign wealth funds and infrastructure development in africa. In Proceedings of Economics and Finance Conferences, number 4206708. International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences. Howell, L. D. and Chaddick, B. (1994). Models of political risk for foreign investment and trade: An assessment of three approaches. The Columbia Journal of World Business, 29(3):70–91. Iossa, E. and Martimort, D. (2012). Risk allocation and the costs and benefits of public–private partnerships. The RAND Journal of Economics, 43(3):442–474. Kuperman, A. J. (2013). Nato’s intervention in libya: A humanitarian success? In Libya, the Responsibility to Protect and the Future of Humanitarian Intervention, pages 191–221. Springer. Mardirosian, R. C. (2010). Infrastructure development in the shadow of conflict: Aligning incentives and attracting investment. Technical report, Working Paper. Mcloughlin, C. (2009). Fragile states. Governance and Social Development Resource Centre. MIGA (2011). World investment and political risk (wipr) report 2010. Last accessed on 04/09/2018 from http://www.miga.org/sites/default/files/archive/Documents/ WIPR13.pdf. MIGA (2014). World investment and political risk (wipr) report 2013. Last accessed on 04/09/2018 from http://www.miga.org/sites/default/files/archive/Documents/ WIPR13.pdf. Miller, K. D. (1992). A framework for integrated risk management in international business. Journal of international business studies, 23(2):311–331. OECD (2008). Concepts and dilemmas of state building in fragile situations : From fragility to resilience. Last accessed on 04/09/2018 from https://www.oecd.org/dac/conflict-fragility-resilience/docs/41100930.pdf. Oh, K.-W. (2015). Reflections on investment prospects for countries facing fragility and conflict. Last accessed on 15/07/2018 from http://blogs.worldbank.org/miga/ reflections-investment-prospects-countries-facing-fragility-and-conflict. Paul, B. and Khalid, A. (2014). Are rates of return in places that are fragile and affected by conflict really higher? Last accessed on 15/07/2018 from http://blogs.worldbank.org/miga/ are-rates-return-places-are-fragile-and-affected-conflict-really-higher. Rajan, R. G. (1992). Insiders and outsiders: The choice between informed and arm’s-length debt. The Journal of finance, 47(4):1367–1400. Sawant, R. J. (2010). Emerging market infrastructure project bonds: Their risks and returns. Journal of Structured Finance, 15(4):75. Villar, D., Dreyhaupt, S., Economou, P., Lambert, C., Verheyen, G., and Salinas, E. (2010). World Investment and Political Risk 2010. The World Bank. Von Thadden, E.-L. (1995). Long-term contracts, short-term investment and monitoring. The Review of Economic Studies, 62(4):557–575. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/90295 |