Dishonesty, Social Information, and Sorting

AKIN, ZAFER (2018): Dishonesty, Social Information, and Sorting.

Abstract

The dishonesty literature investigates how people behave when they are provided certain types of information. However, this approach predominantly ignores the fact that people -to some extent- can choose which information they want to be exposed to. By conducting a laboratory experiment, we study individuals’ decisions to choose which social information they would like to observe and the effect of this sorting on their engagement in unethical conduct. We find evidence that sorting exacerbates the prevalence of dishonesty, which is mainly driven by the ones who chose maximum information. Our results demonstrate that sorting is an important factor determining dishonest behavior and that previously observed levels of prevalence of dishonesty in the literature can be an underestimate of actual level of dishonest behavior in real-world situations.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Dishonesty; social norms; selection; laboratory experiments
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles

References

1.Abeler, J., Nosenzo D. & Raymond C. (2016). Preferences for truth-telling. Forthcoming, Econometrica.

2.Ahn, T. K., Isaac, R., & Salmon, T. C. (2008). Endogenous group formation. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 10(2), 171-194.

3.Becker, G.S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169–217.

4.Blackburn, J., Kourtellis, N., Skvoretz, J., Ripeanu, M., & Iamnitchi, A. (2014). Cheating in online games: a social network perspective. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT), 13(3), 9.

5.Charness, G., Masclet, D., & Villeval, M. C. (2013). The dark side of competition for status. Management Science, 60(1), 38-55.

6.Cialdini, R.B., Reno, R.R., & Kallgren, C.A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026.

7.Cojoc, D., & Stoian, A. (2014). Dishonesty and charitable behavior. Experimental Economics, 17(4), 717-732.

8.Dana, Jason, Daylian M. Cain, and Robyn M. Dawes. 2006. “What You Don’t Know Won’t Hurt Me: Costly (but quiet) Exit in Dictator Games.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 100 (2): 193–201

9.Dana, Jason, Roberto A. Weber, and Jason Xi Kuang. 2007. “Exploiting Moral Wiggle Room: Experiments Demonstrating an Illusory Preference for Fairness.” Economic Theory 33 (1): 67– 80.

10.Diekmann A., Przepiorka W., Rauhut H. (2015) Lifting the veil of ignorance: An experiment on the contagiousness of norm violations. Rationality and Society, 27(3):309-333.

11.Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.

12.Fischbacher, U., & Föllmi-Heusi, F. (2013). Lies in disguise—an experimental study on cheating. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(3), 525-547.

13.Fosgaard, T. R., Hansen, L. G., & Piovesan, M. (2013). Separating Will from Grace: An experiment on conformity and awareness in cheating. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93, 279-284.

14.Gino, F., Ayal, S., & Ariely, D. (2009). Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior. The effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psychological Science, 20(3), 393-398.

15.Gino, F., Ariely, D., (2012). The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102 (3), 445–459.

16.Gino, F., Ayal, S., & Ariely, D. (2013a). Self-serving altruism? The lure of unethical actions that benefit others. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93, 285-292.

17.Gino F., Krupka E. L., Weber R. A. (2013b) License to Cheat: Voluntary Regulation and Ethical Behavior. Management Science, 59(10):2187-2203

18.Gino, F., Norton, M. I., & Weber, R. A. (2016). Motivated Bayesians: Feeling moral while acting egoistically. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3), 189-212.

19.Gneezy, U. (2005). Deception: The Role of Consequences. American Economic Review 95: 384-94.

20.Gneezy, U., Kajackaite, A., & Sobel, J. (2018). Lying Aversion and the Size of the Lie. American Economic Review, 108(2), 419-53.

21.Grolleau G., Kocher M. G., Sutan A. (2016) Cheating and Loss Aversion: Do People Cheat More to Avoid a Loss?. Management Science, 62(12), pp. 3428–3438

22.Grossman, Zachary. 2014. “Strategic Ignorance and the Robustness of Social Preferences.” Management Science 60 (11): 2659–2665.

23.Gürerk, Ö., Irlenbusch, B., & Rockenbach, B. (2006). The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions. Science, 312(5770), 108-111.

24.Haigner, S., Kocher, M. G., & Sutter, M. (2006). Choosing the stick or the carrot? Endogenous institutional choice in social dilemma situations. Centre for Economic Policy Research.

25.Houser, D., Vetter, S., & Winter, J. (2012). Fairness and cheating. European Economic Review, 56(8), 1645-1655.

26.Innes, R., & Mitra, A. (2013). Is dishonesty contagious? Economic Inquiry, 51(1), 722-734.

27.Irlenbusch, B., & Villeval, M. C. (2015). Behavioral ethics: how psychology influenced economics and how economics might inform psychology?. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 87-92.

28.Khalmetski, K., & Sliwka, D. (2017). Disguising Lies-Image Concerns and Partial Lying in Cheating Games (No. 6347). CESifo Group Munich.

29.Kroher, M., & Wolbring, T. (2015). Social control, social learning, and cheating: Evidence from lab and online experiments on dishonesty. Social Science Research, 53, 311-324.

30.Lazear, E. P., Malmendier, U., & Weber, R. A. (2012). Sorting in experiments with application to social preferences. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(1), 136-163.

31.Lefebvre, M., Pestieau, P., Riedl, A., & Villeval, M. C. (2015). Tax evasion and social information: an experiment in Belgium, France, and the Netherlands. International Tax and Public Finance, 22(3), 401-425.

32.Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 633-644.

33.Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1067-1101.

34.Rauhut, H. (2013). Beliefs about Lying and Spreading of Dishonesty: Undetected Lies and Their Constructive and Destructive Social Dynamics in Dice Experiments. PLoS ONE, 8(11): e77878. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077878

35.Shalvi, S., Dana, J., Handgraaf, M.J.J., De Dreu, C.K.W. (2011). Justified ethicality: observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 181–190.

36.Shalvi S., Gino F., Barkan R., Ayal S. (2015). Self-Serving Justifications: Doing Wrong and Feeling Moral. Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol. 24(2) 125– 130.

37.Slonim, R., & Garbarino, E. (2008). Increases in trust and altruism from partner selection: Experimental evidence. Experimental Economics, 11(2), 134-153.

38.Villeval, M. C., & Eriksson, T. (2004). Other-Regarding Preferences and Performance Pay: An Experiment on Incentives and Sorting (No. 1191). IZA Discussion paper series.

39.Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129-140.