Greco, Salvatore and Ishizaka, Alessio and Matarazzo, Benedetto and Torrisi, Gianpiero (2015): Stochastic Multiattribute Acceptability Analysis: an application to the ranking of Italian regions.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_68508.pdf Download (577kB) | Preview |
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_75663.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_91221.pdf Download (740kB) |
Abstract
We consider the issue of ranking regions with respect to a range of economic and social variables. Departing from the current practice of aggregating different dimensions via an arithmetic mean, we instead use Stochastic Multiattribute Acceptability Analysis (SMAA). SMAA takes account of the “whole space” of weights for the considered dimensions. Thus, rather than considering an average person giving equal or fixed weights to all dimensions, SMAA explores how potential differences in individual preferences affect the outcome. In this sense, in contrast to the purported objectivity of the many rankings supplied by economic institutions and mass media, this proposal enhances, simplifies and renders transparent the ranking exercise. The methodology is applied to the ranking of Italian regions, unveiling patterns of similarity and dissimilarity even within the same broad regional economy. Many of these findings are neglected within the extant literature addressing the “Mezzogiorno” problem.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Stochastic Multiattribute Acceptability Analysis: an application to the ranking of Italian regions |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Stochastic Multiattribute Acceptability Analysis, Regional Development, Multiple Criteria Ranking, Composite Index, Multidimensional Gini Indices, Multidimensional Polarization Indices. |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C4 - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics > C43 - Index Numbers and Aggregation R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R12 - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity |
Item ID: | 91221 |
Depositing User: | Gianpiero Torrisi |
Date Deposited: | 07 Jan 2019 09:33 |
Last Modified: | 15 Nov 2024 15:14 |
References: | Anand, S., & Sen, A. (1997). Concepts Or Human Development And Poverty! A Multidimensional Perspective. United Nations De-velopment Programme, Poverty and human development: Human development papers, 1-20. Angilella, S., Bottero, M., Corrente, S., Ferretti, V., Greco, S., & Lami, I. M. (2013). Non Additive Robust Ordinal Regression for urban and territorial planning: an application for siting an urban waste landfill. Annals of Operations Research, 1-30. Angilella, S., Corrente, S., Greco, S. (2015). Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis for the Choquet integral preference model and the scale construction problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(1), 172-182. Angilella, S., et al. "Robust Ordinal Regression and Stochastic Multiobjective Acceptability Analysis in multiple criteria hierarchy process for the Choquet integral preference model." Omega. In Press. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2015.10.010 Annoni, P. (2013). EU Regional Competitiveness Index (RCI 2013). Publications Office. Annoni, P., Kozovska, K. (2010). EU regional competitiveness index. Luxembourg, European Commission. Bandura, R. (2008). "A survey of composite indices measuring country performance: 2008 update." Office of Development Studies. Charnes, A., W. Cooper, and E., Rhodes "Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units," European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429–444, 1987. Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., Rogge, N., Van Puyenbroeck, T., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Liska, R., Tarantola, S. (2008). Creating composite indicators with DEA and robustness analysis: the case of the Technology Achievement Index. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(2), 239-251. Costanza, R., Hart, M., Posner, S., Talberth, J. (2009). Beyond GDP: The Need for New Measures of Progress. Pardee Paper No. 4, Boston: Pardee Center for the Study of the Longer-Range Future. Decanq, K., & Lugo, M. A. (2009). Setting Weights in Multidimensional Indices of Well-being and Deprivation. Document de travail de l’OPHI, (18). Del Monte, A. and R. De Luzenberger (1989). The Effect of Regional Policy on New Firm Formation in Southern Italy. Regional Studies, 23(3), 219-230. Dijkstra, L., Annoni, P., and K. Kozovska. (2011). A New Regional Competitiveness Index: Theory, Methods and Findings, Working Paper 2/2011. Brussels: European Commission. Dunnell, K. (2009). National Statistician’s article: Measuring regional economic performance. Economic and Labour Market Review, 3(1), 18–30 Esteban, J., Gradin, C., & Ray, D. (1999). Extension of a Measure of Polarization, with an Application to the Income Distribution of Five OECD Countries," Papers 24, El Instituto de Estudios Economicos de Galicia Pedro Barrie de la Maza. European Commission. (2013a). One trillion euro to invest in Europe's future – the EU's budget framework 2014-2020. Brussels: European Commission. European Commission. (2013b). Refocusing EU Cohesion Policy for Maximum Impact on Growth and Jobs: The Reform in 10 points. Brussels: European Commission. Great Britain. Department for Communities and Local Government. (2007). Decentralisation outcomes: a review of evidence and analysis of international data. London: DCLG. Foster, J., McGillivray, M., & Seth, S. (2009). Rank robustness of composite indices. OPHI Working paper 26. Helliwell, J. F. (2003). "How's life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being." Economic Modelling. Helliwell, J. F., & Barrington‐Leigh, C. P. (2010). Viewpoint: Measuring and understanding subjective well‐being. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 43(3), 729-753. Herrero, C., Martínez, R., and Villar, A. (2010). Multidimensional social evaluation: an application to the measurement of human development. Review of Income and Wealth, 56(3), 483-497. Huggins, R. (2003). Creating a UK Competitiveness Index: regional and local benchmarking. Regional Studies, 37(1), 89-96. Huggins, R., Davies, W. (2006). European Competitiveness Index 2006-07. Cardiff: University of Wales Institute, Robert Huggins Associates Ltd. Huggins, R., Izushi, H. (2008). UK Competitiveness Index 2008. University of Wales Institute. Cardiff: Centre for International Competitiveness, Cardiff School of Management. Huggins, R., Izushi, H., Davies, W., and L. Shougui. (2008). World Knowledge Competitiveness Index. Cardiff: Centre for International Competitiveness. Huggins, R., and P. Thompson. (2010). UK competitiveness index 2010. Cardiff: Centre for International Competitiveness, UWIC. Huggins, R., and P. Thompson. (2013). UK competitiveness index 2010. Cardiff: Centre for International Competitiveness, UWIC. IMD (2008). World Competitiveness Yearbook 2008. Lausanne: Institute for Management Development. Ishizaka, A. and P. Nemery (2013). Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: Methods and Software, Wiley. Kubiszewski, I., Costanza, R., Franco, C., Lawn, P., Talberth, J., Jackson, T., and C. Aylmer. (2013). Beyond GDP: Measuring and achieving global genuine progress. Ecological Economics 93: 57-68. R. Lahdelma, J. Hokkanen, and P. Salminen. SMAA Stochastic Multiobjective Acceptability Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 106(1):137–143, 1998. R. Lahdelma and P. Salminen. SMAA-2: Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis for group decision making. Operations Research, 49(3):444–454, 2001. Lahdelma R, Salminen P. Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA). In: Ehrgott M, Figueira J, Greco S, editors. Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. New York: Springer; 2010. p 321–354 Lall, S. (2001). Competitiveness indices and developing countries: an economic evaluation of the global competitiveness report. World Development, 29(9), 1501–1525. Monte, A. D., & Luzenberger, R. D. (1989). The effect of regional policy on new firm formation in Southern Italy. Regional Studies, 23(3), 219-230. OECD (2011). How’s Life?: Measuring Well-Being. Paris: OECD Publishing. OECD (2014). How's Life in Your Region?: Measuring Regional and Local Well-being for Policy Making. Paris: OECD Publishing. P. Leskinen, J. Viitanen, A. Kangas, and J. Kangas. Alternatives to incorporate uncertainty and risk attitude in multicriteria evaluation of forest plans. Forest Science, 52(3):304–312, 2006. Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal federalism. New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Permanyer, I. (2011). Assessing the robustness of composite indices rankings. Review of Income and Wealth, 57(2), 306-326. Golden, M. A., & Picci, L. (2005). Proposal for a new measure of corruption, illustrated with Italian data. Economics & Politics, 17(1), 37-75. Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Gill, N. (2003). The global trend towards devolution and its implications. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 21(3), 333–351. Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 168(2), 307-323. Schwab, K. and Porter, M. E. (2007). The Global Competitiveness Report 2007-2008. World Geneva: Economic Forum. Schwab, K. (2009). The Global Competitiveness Report 2009-2010. Geneva: World Economic Forum. Schwab K. (2014). The Global Competitiveness Report 2014–2015. Geneva: World Economic Forum. Spadavecchia, A. (2007). "Regional and national industrial policies in Italy, 1950s–1993. Where did the subsidies flow?" University of Reading Working Paper No. 48. Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). The measurement of economic performance and social progress revisited. Reflections and overview. Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, Paris. T. Tervonen and J.R. Figueira. A survey on stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis methods. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 15(1-2):1–14, 2008. T. Tervonen, J.R. Figueira, R. Lahdelma, and P. Salminen. SMAA-III: A simulation-based approach for sensitivity analysis of ELECTRE III. In: Real-Time and Deliberative Decision Making, pages 241–253. Springer, 2009. Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. The journal of political economy, 416-424. Torrisi, G., Pike, A., Tomaney, J., & Tselios, V. (2015). (Re-)exploring the link between decentralization and regional disparities in Italy. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 122–139. WEF (1999). Schwab, K., Porter, M. E., Sachs, J. D. , Warner, A. M., and Levinson M. (Eds.), The global competitiveness report 1999. New York: Oxford University Press for World Economic Forum. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/91221 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Stochastic Multiattribute Acceptability Analysis: an application to the ranking of Italian regions. (deposited 24 Dec 2015 04:53)
-
Stochastic Multiattribute Acceptability Analysis: an application to the ranking of Italian regions. (deposited 19 Dec 2016 21:37)
- Stochastic Multiattribute Acceptability Analysis: an application to the ranking of Italian regions. (deposited 07 Jan 2019 09:33) [Currently Displayed]
-
Stochastic Multiattribute Acceptability Analysis: an application to the ranking of Italian regions. (deposited 19 Dec 2016 21:37)