Perceived price complexity of dynamic energy tariffs: An investigation of antecedents and consequences

Layer, Patrick and Feurer, Sven and Jochem, Patrick (2017): Perceived price complexity of dynamic energy tariffs: An investigation of antecedents and consequences. Published in: Energy policy , Vol. 106, (4 April 2017): pp. 244-254.

Abstract

Dynamic tariffs have the potential to contribute to a successful shift from conventional to renewable energies, but tapping this potential in Europe ultimately depends on residential consumers selecting them. This study proposes and finds that consumer reactions to dynamic tariffs depend on the level of perceived price complexity that represents the cognitive effort consumers must engage in to compute the overall bill amount. An online experiment conducted with a representative sample of 664 German residential energy consumers examines how salient characteristics of dynamic tariffs contribute to perceived price complexity. Subsequently, a structural equation model (SEM) reveals that the depth of information processing is central to understand how price complexity relates to consumers’ behavioral intentions. The results suggest that it will be challenging to convince European consumers to select complex dynamic tariffs under the current legal framework. Policymakers will need to find ways to make these tariffs more attractive.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: dynamic energy tariffs
• Subjects: M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M3 - Marketing and Advertising > M30 - General; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R2 - Household Analysis

References

Alba, J.W., Mela, C.F., Shimp, T.A., Urbany, J.E., 1999. The effect of discount frequency and depth on consumer price judgments. J. Consum. Res. 26, 99–114.

Ashraf, N., 2009. Spousal control and intra-household decision making: an experimental study in the Philippines. Am. Econ. Rev. 99, 1245–1277.

Bemmaor, A.C., 1995. Predicting behavior from intention-to-buy measures: the parametric case. J. Mark. Res. 32,176–191.

Bennett, P.D., Harrell, G.D., 1975. The role of confidence in understanding and predicting buyers' attitudes and purchase intentions. J. Consum. Res. 2, 110–117.

Bornemann, T., Homburg, C., 2011. Psychological distance and the dual role of price. J. Consum. Res. 38, 490–504.

Breukers, S.C., Mourik, R.M., 2013. The end-users as starting point for designing dynamic pricing approaches to change household energy consumption behaviours. Report for Netbeheer Nederland, Project group Smart Grids (Pg SG). Arnhem: March 2013.

Breukers, S.C., Heiskanen, E., Brohmann, B., Mourik, R.M., Feenstra, C.F.J., 2011. Connecting research to practice to improve energy demand-side management (DSM). Energy 36, 2176–2185.

Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., 1982. The need for cognition. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 42, 116–131.

Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., Feinstein, J.A., Jarvis, W.B.G., 1996. Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: the life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychol. Bull. 119, 197–253.

Carlin, B.I., 2009. Strategic price complexity in retail financial markets. J. Financ. Econ.91, 278–287.

Carlson, J.P., Weathers, D., 2008. Examining differences in consumer reactions to partitioned prices with a variable number of price components. J. Bus. Res. 61, 724–731.

Chaiken, S., 1980. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39, 752–766.

Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., Eagly, A.H., 1989. Heuristic and systematic information processing withing and beyond the Persuasion Context. In: Uleman, J.S., Bargh, J.A. (Eds.), Unintended Thought. The Guilford Press, New York, NY, 212–252.

Chandran, S., Morwitz, V.G., 2005. Effects of Participative Pricing on Consumers’ Cognitions and Actions: A Goal Theoretic Perspective. J. Consum. Res. 32, 249–259.

Chen, S., Chaiken, S., 1999. The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In: Chaiken, S., Trope, Y. (Eds.), Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology.. Guilford, New York, NY, 73–96.

Choi, J., Li, Y.J., Rangan, P., Chatterjee, P., Singh, S.N., 2014. The odd-ending price justification effect: the influence of price-endings on hedonic and utilitarian consumption. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 42, 545–557.

Cotte, J., Wood, S.L., 2004. Families and innovative consumer behavior: a triadic analysis of sibling and parental influence. J. Consum. Res. 31, 78–86.

Coulter, R.A., Price, L.L., Feick, L., 2003. Rethinking the origins of involvement and brand commitment: insights from postsocialist central Europe. J. Consum. Res. 30, 161–169.

Darby, S.J., Pisica, I., 2013. Focus on electricity tariffs: experience and exploration of different charging schemes. In: Proceedings of the ECEEE Summer Study, Hyres, France, 2321–2331.

Davis, H.L., 1976. Decision making within the household. J. Consum. Res. 2, 241–260. Dupont, B., De Jonghe, C., Olmos, L., Belmans, R., 2014. Demand response with locational dynamic pricing to support the integration of renewables. Energy Policy 67, 344–354.

Dütschke, E., Paetz, A.G., 2013. Dynamic electricity pricing-Which programs do consumers prefer? Energy Policy 59, 226–234.

EC (European Commission), 2010. State of play in the EU energy policy. Accompanying document to COM (2010) 639 (SEC )(2010) (1346 final). European Commission (EC), Brussels.

Estelami, H., 1999. The computational effect of price endings in multi-dimensional price advertising. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 8, 244–256.

Estelami, H., 2003. The effect of price presentation tactics on consumer evaluation effort of multi-dimensional prices. J. Mark. Theory Pract., 1–16.

Faruqui, A., Sergici, S., 2010. Household response to dynamic pricing of electricity: a survey of 15 experiments. J. Regul. Econ. 38, 193–225.

Faruqui, A., Harris, D., Hledik, R., 2010. Unlocking the €53 billion savings from smart meters in the EU: how increasing the adoption of dynamic tariffs could make or break the EU's smart grid investment. Energy Policy 38, 6222–6231.

Fell, M.J., Shipworth, D., Huebner, G.M., Elwell, C.A., 2015. Knowing me, knowing you: the role of trust, locus of control and privacy concern in acceptance of domestic electricity demand-side response, ECEEE 2015 Summer Study Proceedings, Presqu'île de Giens, France, 2153–2163.

Festinger, L., 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Row, Peterson, Evanston, (Il). Feurer, S., Schuhmacher, M.C., Kuester, S., 2015. Divide tariffs and prosper? A focus on the role of need for cognition. Mark. ZFP - J. Res. Manag. 37, 101–108. Fischer, C., 2008. Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? Energy Effic. 1, 79–104.

Fiske, S.T., Taylor, S.E., 1991. Social Cognition. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F., 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18, 39–50. Goode, M.R., Dahl, D.W., Moreau, C.P., 2013. Innovation aesthetics: the relationship between category cues, categorization certainty, and newness perceptions. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 30, 192–208.

Goodman, J.K., Irmak, C., 2013. Having versus consuming: failure to estimate usage frequency makes consumers prefer multifeature products. J. Mark. Res. 50, 44–54.

Gordon, K., Olson, W.P., Nieto, A.D., 2006. Responding to EPAct 2005: Looking at smart meters for electricity, time-based rate structures and net metering. Edison Electr. Institute, May.

Gottwalt, S., Ketter, W., Block, C., Collins, J., Weinhardt, C., 2011. Demand side management-A simulation of household behavior under variable prices. Energy Policy 39, 8163–8174.

Greenleaf, E.A., Johnson, E.J., Morwitz, V.G., Shalev, E., 2016. The price does not include additional taxes, fees, and surcharges: a review of research on partitioned pricing. J. Consum. Psychol. 26, 105–124.

Grisé, M.-L., Gallupe, R.B., 1999. Information Overload: Addressing the Productivity Paradox in Face-to-Face Electronic Meetings. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 16, 157–185.

Grünewald, P., McKenna, E., Thomson, M., 2015. Keep it simple: time-of-use tariffs in high-wind scenarios. IET Renew. Power Gener. 9, 176–183.

Hall, N.L., Jeanneret, T.D., Rai, A., 2016. Cost-reflective electricity pricing: consumer preferences and perceptions. Energy Policy 95, 62–72.

Hargreaves, T., Nye, M., Burgess, J., 2010. Making energy visible: a qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors. Energy Policy 38, 6111–6119.

Haugtvedt, C., Petty, R., Cacioppo, J., 1992. Need for cognition and advertising: Understanding the role of personality variables in consumer behavior. J. Consum. Psychol. 1, 239–260.

Homburg, C., Totzek, D., Krämer, M., 2014. How price complexity takes its toll: the neglected role of a simplicity bias and fairness in price evaluations. J. Bus. Res. 67, 1114–1122.

Jacowitz, K.E., Kahneman, D., 1995. Measures of anchoring in estimation tasks. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 21, 1161–1166.

Jost, J.T., Kruglanski, A.W., Nelson, T.O., 1998. Social metacognition: an expansionist review. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2, 137–154.

Keller, P.A., Lipkus, I.M., Rimer, B.K., 2002. Depressive Realism and Health Risk Accuracy: The Negative Consequences of Positive Mood. J. Consum. Res. 29, 57–67.

Lambrecht, A., Skiera, B., 2006. Paying too much and being happy about it: Existence, causes and consequences of tariff-choice biases. J. Mark. Res. 43, 212–223.

Lijesen, M.G., 2007. The real-time price elasticity of electricity. Energy Econ. 29, 249–258.

Loisel, R., Mercier, A., Gatzen, C., Elms, N., Petric, H., 2010. Valuation framework for large scale electricity storage in a case with wind curtailment. Energy Policy 38, 7323–7337.

MacInnis, D.J., Moorman, C., Jaworski, B.J., Maclnnis, D.J., Moorman, C., Jaworski, B.J., 1991. Enhancing and Measuring consumers’ motivation, opportunity, and ability to process brand information from ads. J. Mark. 55, 32–53.

Malhotra, N., 1982. Information load and consumer decision making. J. Consum. Res. 8, 419–430.

Miller, G., 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev. 101, 343–352.

Mills, B., Schleich, J., 2012. Residential energy-efficient technology adoption, energy conservation, knowledge, and attitudes: an analysis of European countries. Energy Policy 49, 616–628.

Mitchell, V.-W., 1999. Consumer perceived risk: conceptualisations and models. Eur. J. Mark. 33, 163–195.

Morwitz, V., Greenleaf, E., Johnson, E., 1998. Divide and prosper: consumers’ reactions to partitioned prices. J. Mark. Res. 35, 453–463.

Newsham, G.R., Bowker, B.G., 2010. The effect of utility time-varying pricing and load control strategies on residential summer peak electricity use: a review. Energy Policy 38 (7), 3289–3296.

Novak, T.P., Hoffman, D.L., 2009. The Fit of Thinking Style and Situation: New Measures of Situation‐Specific Experiential and Rational Cognition. J. Consum. Res. 36, 56–72.

Nunes, J.C., 2000. A cognitive model of people's usage estimations. J. Mark. Res. 37, 397–409.

Paetz, A.-G., Dütschke, E., Fichtner, W., 2012. Smart homes as a means to sustainable energy consumption:: a study of consumer perceptions. J. Consum. Policy 35, 23–41.

Petty, R.E., Briñol, P., Tormala, Z.L., 2002. Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: the self-validation hypothesis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82, 722–741. Quillinan, J.D., 2011. Pricing for retail electricity. J. Revenue Pricing Manag. 10, 545–555.

Roscoe, A.J., Ault, G.W., 2010. Supporting high penetrations of renewable generation via implementation of real-time electricity pricing and demand response. IET Renew. Power Gener. 4, 369–382.

Salies, E., 2013. Real-time pricing when some consumers resist in saving electricity. Energy Policy 59, 843–849.

Schlereth, C., Skiera, B., 2012. Measurement of consumer preferences for bucket pricing plans with different service attributes. Int. J. Res. Mark. 29, 167–180.

Shiffrin, R.M., Schneider, W., 1977. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychol. Rev. 84, 127–190.

Shugan, S., 1980. The cost of thinking. J. Consum. Res. 7, 99–111.

Simshauser, P., Downer, D., Street, E., 2014. On the inequity of flat-rate electricity tariffs, 1–24.

Stenner, K., Frederiks, E., Hobman, E.V., Meikle, S., 2015. Aust. Consumers’ Likely Response Cost.- Reflective Electr. Pricing, 1–79.

Thomas, M., Simon, D.H., Kadiyali, V., 2010. The price precision effect: evidence from laboratory and market data. Mark. Sci. 29, 175–190.

Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185, 1124–1131.

Wilson, C., Dowlatabadi, H., 2007. Models of decision making and residential energy use. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 32, 169–203.

Zeithaml, V., 1988. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Mark. 52, 2–22.