The dynamic effects of government spending: a FAVAR approach

Pallara, Kevin (2016): The dynamic effects of government spending: a FAVAR approach.

Abstract

The aim of the following work is to assess the dynamic effects of government spending on an extensive set of variables via macroeconometric modeling. As argued in Fatas and Mihov (2001), the following analysis of government spending is not a restrictive focus, but it explicitly aims at resolving a conflict among competing theories. Considering that the intrinsic nature of fiscal policy is to be predicted by economic agents, namely, there exists a problem of fiscal foresight, the exogenous shock in government expenditure cannot be regarded as the structural ones. Hence, it is crucial to build a time series that unmistakably conveys fiscal news to both econometrician and economic agents. In Auerbach and Gorodnichenko (2012) and in Fragetta and Gasteiger (2014), it is proposed to consider the effects of the shock in the forecasting of the growth rate of government spending, which is defined as purified spending shock; the latter fiscal variable should contain the relevant information regarding changes in public expenditure and aim at resolving the fiscal foresight issue. Furthermore, the econometrician can include in the VAR only a limited number of variables. The narrowness of the included variables could lead to non-fundamental shocks and, thus, to biased estimates. In fact, small scale VARs might suffer of deficiency of information given that the information set spanned by the endogenous variables in the VAR might be smaller than the one detained by economic agents. A way to uncover the comovements in the economy is to extract factors from a large informational dataset via Principal Component Analysis. Thus, including principal components that are consistent estimates of the factors in the model in order to build a factor-augmented VAR (FAVAR) as in Bernanke et al. (2005) should amend the non-fundamentalness problem. Therefore, applying the above-mentioned methodology, the impact on key macroeconomic variables is similar across VAR and FAVAR specifications, besides the effect on inflation that is negative and significant in the FAVAR estimation; the latter result is quite puzzling and it relates to the interaction between the forward-looking nature of inflation and the information-augmenting factors.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Government spending, fiscal policy, FAVAR, VAR, fiscal news, fundamentalness, limited information
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C51 - Model Construction and Estimation; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C55 - Large Data Sets: Modeling and Analysis; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy; H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H30 - General; H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H50 - General

References

Alesina, Alberto, et al. Fiscal policy, profits, and investment, The American Economic Review 92.3 (2002): 571-589.

Alessi, Lucia, Matteo Barigozzi, and Marco Capasso. A robust criterion for determining the number of static factors in approximate factor models, European Central Bank 0903 (2008).

Auerbach, Alan J., and Yuriy Gorodnichenko. Measuring the output responses to fiscal policy, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 4.2 (2012): 1-27.

Bai, Jushan. Estimating cross-section common stochastic trends in nonstationary panel data, Journal of Econometrics 122.1 (2004): 137-183.

Bai, Jushan, and Serena Ng. Determining the number of factors in approximate factor models, Econometrica 70.1 (2002): 191-221.

Bai, Jushan, and Serena Ng. A PANIC attack on unit roots and cointegration. Econometrica 72.4 (2004): 1127-1177.

Bai, Zhidong, Wing-Keung Wong, and Bingzhi Zhang. Multivariate linear and nonlinear causality tests, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 81.1 (2010): 5-17.

Banerjee, Anindya, Massimiliano Marcellino, and Igor Masten. Forecasting with factor-augmented error correction models, International Journal of Forecasting 30.3 (2014): 589-612.

Barro, Robert J. Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth, The Journal of Political Economy 98.5 (1990): S103-S125.

Blanchard, Olivier, and Roberto Perotti. An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending and taxes on output. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117.4 (2002): 1329-1368.

Bernanke, B. S. J. Boivin and P. Eliasz. Measuring the Effects of Monetary Policy: A Factor-Augmented Vector Autoregressive (FAVAR) approach, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Feb 387 (2005): 422.

Burnside, Craig, Martin Eichenbaum, and Jonas DM Fisher. Fiscal shocks and their consequences. Journal of Economic theory 115.1 (2004): 89-117.

Caldara, Dario, and Christophe Kamps. What are the effects of fiscal policy shocks? A VAR-based comparative analysis. European Central Bank 0877 (2008).

Calvo, Guillermo A. Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework, Journal of monetary Economics 12.3 (1983): 383-398.

Campbell, John Y., and N. Gregory Mankiw. Consumption, Income, and Interest Rates: Reinterpreting the Time Series Evidence, NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1989.4 (1989): 185-216.

Centoni, Marco, and Gianluca Cubadda. Modelling comovements of economic time series: a selective survey, Statistica 71.2 (2011): 267-294.

Edelberg, Wendy, Martin Eichenbaum, and Jonas DM Fisher. Understanding the effects of a shock to government purchases. Review of Economic Dynamics 2.1 (1999): 166-206.

Fatas, Antonio, and Ilian Mihov. The effects of fiscal policy on consumption and employment: theory and evidence. CEPR Discussion Papers 2760 (2001).

Favero, Carlo A., Massimiliano Marcellino, and Francesca Neglia. Principal components at work: the empirical analysis of monetary policy with large data sets, Journal of Applied Econometrics 20.5 (2005): 603-620.

Forni, Mario, and Luca Gambetti. Fiscal foresight and the effects of government spending. CEPR Discussion Papers 7840 (2010).

Forni, Mario, Luca Gambetti, and Luca Sala. No news in business cycles, CEPR Discussion Paper 8274 (2011).

Forni, Mario, and Luca Gambetti. Sufficient information in structural VARs, Journal of Monetary Economics 66 (2014): 124-136.

Forni, Mario, et al. The generalized dynamic-factor model: Identification and estimation, Review of Economics and statistics 82.4 (2000): 540-554.

Fragetta, Matteo, and Emanuel Gasteiger. Fiscal Foresight, Limited Information and the Effects of Government Spending Shocks, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 76.5 (2014): 667-692.

Galì, Jordi, J. David Lòpez Salido, and Javier Vallès. Understanding the effects of government spending on consumption, Journal of the European Economic Association 5.1 (2007): 227-270.

Hamilton, James D. Historical causes of postwar oil shocks and recessions. The Energy Journal 6.1 (1985): 97-116.

Koop, Gary, and Dimitris Korobilis. Bayesian Multivariate Time Series Methods for Empirical Macroeconomics, Now Publishers Inc., Foundations and Trends in Econometrics 3.4 (2010): 267-358.

Koop, Gary, and Dimitris Korobilis. UK macroeconomic forecasting with many predictors: Which models forecast best and when do they do so?, Economic Modelling 28.5 (2011): 2307-2318.

Leeper, Eric M., Todd B. Walker, and Shu Chun Susan Yang. Fiscal Foresight: Analytics and Econometrics. NBER Working Papers 15188 (2008).

Lippi, Marco, and Lucrezia Reichlin. The dynamic effects of aggregate demand and supply disturbances: Comment. The American Economic Review 83.3 (1993): 644-652.

Lippi, Marco, and Lucrezia Reichlin. VAR analysis, nonfundamental representations, Blaschke matrices. Journal of Econometrics 63.1 (1994): 307-325.

Mankiw, N. Gregory. The savers-spenders theory of fiscal policy. American Economic Review 90.2 (2000): 120-125.

Mertens, Karel, and Morten O. Ravn. Measuring the impact of fiscal policy in the face of anticipation: a structural VAR approach. The Economic Journal 120.544 (2010): 393-413.

Mountford, Andrew, and Harald Uhlig. What are the Effect of Fiscal Policy Shocks, SFB Discussion Paper No. 2005-039 (2005).

Perotti, Roberto. In search of the transmission mechanism of fiscal policy, NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2007.22 (2007): 169 - 226

Ramey, Valerie A., and Matthew D. Shapiro. Costly capital reallocation and the effects of government spending, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy. Vol. 48. North-Holland (1998).

Ramey, Valerie A. Defense News Shocks, 1939-2008: Estimates Based on News Sources. Unpublished paper, University of California, San Diego (2009).

Ramey, Valerie A. Can government purchases stimulate the economy?, Journal of Economic Literature 49.3 (2011a): 673-685.

Ramey, Valerie A. Identifying Government Spending Shocks: It's All in the Timing. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126.1 (2011b): 1-50.

Sims, Christopher A. Macroeconomics and reality, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society (1980): 1-48.

Stock, James H., and Mark W. Watson. Macroeconomic forecasting using diffusion indexes, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 20.2 (2002): 147-162.

Stock, James H., and Mark W. Watson. Forecasting using principal components from a large number of predictors, Journal of the American statistical association 97.460 (2002): 1167-1179.

Stock, James H., and Mark W. Watson. Implications of dynamic factor models for VAR analysis. NBER Working Papers 11467 (2005).

Stock, James H., and Mark W. Watson. Dynamic factor models, Oxford handbook of economic forecasting 1 (2011): 35-59.

Wolff, Eric N. Recent Trends in the Size Distribution of Household Wealth. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (1998):131-150.