Mostafa Amir, Sabbih (2019): Does a Strong Academic Integrity Culture Discourage Academic Dishonesty Among Graduate Students?
PDF
MPRA_paper_93012.pdf Download (366kB) |
Abstract
The issue of academic dishonesty has received a considerable amount of attention in academic studies over the past 20 years. Researchers have tried to empirically test a number of determinants and factors to explain academic dishonesty. This article aim to investigate the influence of an integrity culture on discouraging academic dishonesty among graduate students of KDI School through applying the knowledge of previous studies related to the academic integrity culture. It applied simple correlation test to observe the influence of contextual factors including existence of honor codes, chance of getting caught and punishment on the likelihood of cheating. However, it could not find enough evidence to support that a strong academic integrity culture discourage academic dishonesty and suspected that there may be other demographic and cultural factors associated.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Does a Strong Academic Integrity Culture Discourage Academic Dishonesty Among Graduate Students? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Academic integrity, contextual factors, higher education, cheating |
Subjects: | I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I23 - Higher Education ; Research Institutions |
Item ID: | 93012 |
Depositing User: | Mr Sabbih Mostafa Amir |
Date Deposited: | 01 Apr 2019 09:09 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 06:04 |
References: | Crown, D. F. and Spiller, M. S. (1998). Learning from the Literature on Collegiate Cheating: A Review of Empirical Research. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 683–700. Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H. and McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic Dishonesty: Prevalence, Determinants, Techniques, and Punishments. Teaching of Psychology, 19(1), 16–20. Gibbs, J. P. (1975). Crime, Punishment, and Deterrence. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Hartshorn, H. and May, M. A. (1928). Studies in Deceit. New York: MacMillian. Hetherington, E. M. and Feldman, S. E. (1964). College Cheating as a Function of Subject and Situational Variables. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 212–218. Kaufmann J., West, T., Ravenscroft, S. and Shrader, C. B. (2005). Ethical Distancing: Rationalizing Violations of Organizational Norms. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 24(3), 101–134. Kelly, J. A. and Worrell, L. (1978). Personality Characteristics, Parent Behaviors, and Sex of the Subject in Relation to Cheating. Journal of Research in Personality, 12, 179–188. Kidwell, L.A. and Kent, J. (2008). Integrity at a Distance: A Study of Academic Misconduct among University Students on and off Campus. Accounting Education: an international journal, 17, 3-16. Kisamore, J.L., Stone, T.H. and Jawahar, I.M. (2007). Academic Integrity: The Relationship between Individual and Situational Factors on Misconduct Contemplations. Journal of Business Ethics, 75:381–394. ———. (2007). Academic Integrity: The Relationship between Individual and Situational Factors on Misconduct Contemplations. Journal of Business Ethics, 75:381–394. McCabe, D. L. (1992). The Influence of Situational Ethics on Cheating among College Students. Sociological Inquiry, 62(3), 365–374. McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K. (1993). Academic Dishonesty: Honor Codes and Other Contextual Influences. Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 522–538. ———. (1997). Individual and Contextual Influences on Academic Dishonesty: A Multi-Campus Investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38(3), 379–396. McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K. and Butterfield, K. D. (1999). Academic Integrity in Honor Code and Non-honor Code Environments: A Qualitative Investigation. The Journal of Higher Education, 70(2), 211–234. ———. (2001). Dishonesty in Academic Environments. Journal of Higher Education, 72, 29–45. ———. (2002). Honor Codes and Other Contextual Influences on Academic Integrity: A Replication and Extension of Modified Honor Code Settings. Research in Higher Education, 43(3), 357–378. Michaels, J. W., and Miethe, T. D. (1989). Applying Theories of Deviance to Academic Cheating. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 872-85. Nonis, S. and Swift, C. O. (2001). An Examination of the Relationship between Academic Dishonesty and Workplace Dishonesty: A Multi-Campus Investigation. Journal of Education for Business, 77(2), 69–77. Nowell, C., and D. Laufer. 1997. Undergraduate student cheating in the fields of business and economics. Research in Economic Education 18(1): 3-12. Piliavin, I., Thornton, C., Gartner, R. and Matsueda, R. (1986). Crime, deterrence and rational choice. American Sociological Review, 47, 489-504. Simon, C. A., Carr, J. R., McCullough, S. M., Morgan, S. J., Oleson, T. and Ressel, M. (2004). Gender, Student Perceptions, Institutional Commitments and Academic Dishonesty: Who Reports in Academic Dishonesty Cases?. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 75–90. Smyth,L. S. and Davis, J.R. (2004). Perceptions of Dishonesty among Two-year College Students: Academic versus Business Situations. Journal of Business Ethics, 51, 62–73. Tittle, C.R and Rowe, A.R. (1973). Moral appeal, sanction threat and deviance: An experimental test. Social Problem, 20, 488-497. Zimring, F. E., and Hawkins. G. J. (1973). Deterrence: The Legal Threat in Crime Control. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/93012 |