The benefit of management policy of Seoul on airborne particulate matter: An application of contingent valuation

Hwang, In Chang and Son, Wonik (2019): The benefit of management policy of Seoul on airborne particulate matter: An application of contingent valuation.

Abstract

There is an increasing concern on particulate matter (PM) management in Seoul. The annual mean PM concentration of Seoul is far higher than the World Health Organization guideline and its decreasing rate has been slowed since 2012. Seoul Metropolitan Government has made various efforts to solve the problem. In particular, after an open forum held in June 2017, the Ten Measures for Fine Particles were established. Since the management of fine particles would enforce a huge budget (annual mean of 146 million US dollar) it requires a legitimate validation by the benefit analysis. This paper aims to estimate the benefit of the management policy of Seoul on airborne particulate matter. The benefit is estimated by the contingent valuation method. The estimation by the Spike model shows that the annual willingness to pay (WTP) per household for the management of airborne particulate matter is 126 US dollar (or 138,107 Korean won) (95% confidence interval of 114 to 137 US dollar). The applications of the other statistical models are also analyzed. Considering the total number of households, annual benefit of the management policy of Seoul on airborne particulate matter is 492 million US dollar annually (95% confidence interval of 446 to 537 million US dollar). A simple comparison shows that the benefit of the management of airborne particulate matter in Seoul is 3~4 times higher than the incurred expense.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Air pollution; Contingent valuation; Particulate matter; Willingness to pay
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling

References

AEA, 2011. Cost benefit analysis for the revision of the national emission ceilings directive. Report to European Commission.

Ahn, S., Bae, H., Kwak, S., Lim, Y., Kim, M., Oh, S., 2016. Assessment of human health effects of air-pollution using cohort DB and estimation of associated economic costs in Korea (2). The Korea Environment Institute. (in Korean)

Amann, M., 2014. The final policy scenarios of the EU clean air policy package. IIASA, Laxenburg.

Amann, M., Bertok, I., Borken-Kleefeld, J., Cofala, J., Heyes, C., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Klimont Z., Rafaj, P, Schöpp, W., Wagner, F., 2011. Cost-effective emission reductions to improve air quality in Europe in 2020. IIASA, Laxenburg.

Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P.R., Leamer, E.E., Radner, R., Schuman, H., 1993. Report for the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. NOAA.

Brookshire, D.S., Thayer, M.A., Schulze, W.D., d'Arge, R.C., 1982. Valuing public goods: A comparison of survey and hedonic approaches. The American Economic Review 72:165-177.

Carson, R.T., 1991. Constructed markets. In Braden, J.B. and Kolstad, C.D. (eds.), Measuring the demand for environmental quality. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

Carson, R.T., Hanemann, W.M., 2005. Contingent valuation. In Mäler, K.G. and Vincent J.R. (eds), Handbook of Environmental Economics Vol.2., Elsevier.

Carson, R.T., Mitchell, R.C., Hanemann, W.M., Kopp, R.J., Presser, S., Ruud, P.A., 2003. Contingent valuation and lost passive use: damages from the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Environmental and Resource Economics 25: 257–286.

Cho, S.K., Chang, J.I., Kim, J.I., 2006. Valuing the health effects on air quality improvement: Using conjoint analysis. Environmental and Resource Economics Review 15(5): 859-884. (in Korean)

Cohen, A., Brauer, M., Burnett, R., Anderson, H., Frostad, J., Estep, K. et al., 2017. Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015. Lancet 389: 1907-18.

EPA, 2011. The benefits and costs of the clean air act from 1990 to 2020: Summary report.

Haab, T.C., McConnell, K.E., 2002. Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources. Edward Elgar, Northampton.

Han, C.W., Kim, S.T., Lim, Y.H., Bae, H.J., Hong, Y.C., 2018. Spatial and Temporal Trends of Number of Deaths Attributable to Ambient PM2.5 in the Korea. Journal of Korean Medical Science. The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.

Holland, M., 2014. Cost-benefit analysis of final policy scenarios for the EU clean air package. EMRC.

Hong, J.H., Oh, H.N., 2006. Economic value of improving indoor air quality of subway stations in Seoul metropolitan area. Journal of the Association of Korean Economic Studies 17: 169-198. (in Korean)

Hwang, I.C., 2018. A review of particulate matter management policy of Seoul. Korean Policy Studies Review 27(2): 27-50. (in Korean)

Hwang, I.C., Kim, C., Son, W., 2018. The benefit of particulate matter management policy of Seoul. The Seoul Institute (in Korean). IIASA, 2009. GAINS online: Tutorial for advanced users. IIASA, Laxenburg.

KDI, 2012. CVM guidelines for preliminary feasibility study. Korea Development Institute (in Korean).

Kim, J.H., Kim, H.J., Yoo, S.H., 2018. Public Value of Enforcing the PM2.5 Concentration Reduction Policy in South Korean Urban Areas. Sustainability 10(4); https://doi:10.3390/su10041144

Kolstad, C., 2011. Intermediate Environmental Economics. Oxford University Press, New York.

Kristrӧm, B., 1997. Spike models in contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(3): 1013-1023.

Kwak, S., Russell, C.S., 1994. Contingent valuation in Korean environmental planning: A pilot application to the protection of drinking water in Seoul. Environmental and Resource Economics 4:511-526.

Kwon, K., Seo, I., 2010. Estimating the value of Air Quality in Seoul Metropolitan City: Measure of WTP utilizing CVM & Weibull Distribution Function. Korea Journal of Policy Analysis and Evaluation 20(2): 185-208. (in Korean)

Lee, Y.J., Lim, Y.W., Yang, J.Y., Kim, C.S., Shin, Y.C., Shin, D.C., 2011. Evaluating the PM damage cost due to urban air pollution and vehicle emissions in Seoul. Korea. Journal of Environmental Management 92:503-609; https://doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.09.028

NOAA, 2002. Strategic research plan for particulate matter. Air quality research subcommittee of the committee on environment and natural resources.

OECD, 2014. The cost of air pollution: Health impacts of road transport. OECD Publishing.

OECD, 2016. The economic consequences of outdoor air pollution. OECD Publishing.

Otsuka, K., 2018. Shift in China’s commitment to regional environmental governance in Northeast Asia? Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies 7(1): 16-34.

Reimann, K.D., 2014. Environment, human security, and cooperation in Asia. In. Pekkanen, S.M. et al. (2014) eds. Oxford handbook of the international relations of Asia. Oxford University Press.

Rhee, H.C., Chung, H.S., Kim, T.H., 2004. Valuation of air quality in the metropolitan Seoul. Environmental and Resource Economics Review 13(3): 387-415. (in Korean)

SMG, 2016. Emission inventory and source apportionment of PM 2.5. Seoul Metropolitan Government (in Korean)

Tientenberg, T., Lewis, L., 2012. Environmental and Natural Resource Economics. Pearson Education Inc.

Wei, W., Wu, Y., 2016. Willingness to pay to control PM2. 5 pollution in Jing-Jin-Ji Region., China. Applied Economics Letters 24(11): 753-761.

WHO, 2015. Health and the environment: addressing the health impact of air pollution. Sixty-eighth world health assembly agenda item 14.6, WHA68.8.

WHO, 2016. Ambient air pollution: A global assessment of exposure and burden of disease. WHO Press, Geneva. WHO Europe and OECD, 2015. Economic cost of the health impact of air pollution in Europe.

World Bank and IHME, 2016. The cost of air pollution: Strengthening the economic case for action. The World Bank and Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation.

Yin, H., Pizzol, M., Jacobsen, J., Xu, L., 2018. Contingent valuation of health and mood impacts of PM2.5 in Beijing, China, Science of the Total Environment 630: 1269-1282.

Yu, S. H., Gwak, S.J., Lee, J. S., 2003. Measuring the environmental costs of air pollution impacts in Seoul: A conjoint analysis. Journal of the Korean Regional Science Association 19(3): 1-17. (in Korean)