Hysteresis of Unemployment Rates in Africa: New Findings from Fourier ADF test

Yaya, OlaOluwa S and Ogbonna, Ahamuefula and Mudida, Robert (2019): Hysteresis of Unemployment Rates in Africa: New Findings from Fourier ADF test.

Abstract

We investigate unit root in the unemployment rates of 42 African countries. The essence is to clarify if the hypothesis of hysteresis holds or unemployment rate is dubbed as having natural rate, that is, stationarity. Having considered a novel approach that considers the nonlinear Fourier and a structural break in the unit root testing framework, we find the classical unit root test wrongly accepting the hysteresis hypothesis of unemployment rate in selected African countries more than 60% of the cases. Meanwhile, our approach finds fewer cases of hysteresis in the unemployment rate than initially detected by the conventional classical test: the hysteresis hypothesis is found to hold in only 7 countries (Algeria, Botswana, Cabo Verde, Congo DR, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia and Tanzania) out of the 42 African countries. This implies that with the exception of the seven countries mentioned, shocks to unemployment will be transitory and strong policy action will not be required to address unemployment challenges. This suggests that hysteresis effects will be offset in overall since these are concentrated in smaller African economies and portends for a faster recovery to shocks in the broader African context. Robustness check proves the superiority of the Fourier unit root tests with structural break over other lower alternatives.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Africa; Fourier function; Hysteresis hypothesis; Structural breaks; Natural rate of unemployment; Unemployment rate; Unit root test
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E24 - Employment ; Unemployment ; Wages ; Intergenerational Income Distribution ; Aggregate Human Capital ; Aggregate Labor Productivity; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J4 - Particular Labor Markets; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers > J64 - Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search

References

Albulescu, C. T. and Tiwari, A. K. (2017): Unemployment persistence in EU countries: new evidence using bounded unit root tests, Applied Economics Letters, DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2017.1368979

Akdogan, K. (2017) (2017) 80/13504851.2017.1368979sing bounded unit root test Empirical Economics, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 1415504851.doi: 10.1007/s00181-016-1171-8.

Blanchard, O.J. and Summers, L.H. (1986). Hysteresis in unemployment. NBER Working paper series No. 2035.

Becker, R., Enders, W. and Lee, J. (2006). A stationarity test in the presence of an unknown number of smooth breaks. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 27(3), 381-401.

Blanchard, O.J. and Summers, L.H. (1986). Hysteresis in unemployment. NBER Working paper series No. 2035.

Bolat, A., Tiwari, A. K., & Erdayi, A. U. (2014). Unemployment hysteresis in the Eurozone area: Evidences from nonlinear heterogeneous panel unit root test. Applied Economics Letters, 21(8), 536–540.

Breuer, J. B., McNown, R., & Wallace, M. S. (2001). Misleading inferences from panel unit-root tests with an illustration from purchasing power parity. Review of International Economics, 9(3), 482–493.

Brunello, G. (1990). Hysteresis and the Japanese experience: A preliminary investigation. Oxford Economic Papers, 42, 483–500.

Campbell, J. and Perron, P. 1991, ‘Pitfalls and opportunities: What macroeconomists should know about unit roots’, NBER Macroeconomics Annual, pp. 141–201.

Caporale, G. M. and Gil‐Alana, L. A. (2007). Non‐linearities and fractional integration in the US unemployment rate. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69: 521‐544.

Caporale, G. M. and Gil‐Alana, L. A. (2008). Modelling the US, UK and Japanese unemployment rates: Fractional integration and structural breaks. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 52: 4998‐5013.

Caporale, G.M. and Gil-Alana, L.A. (2016). Testing unemployment theories: a multivariate long memory approach. Journal of Applied Economics, 19(1), 95-112.

Caporale, G. M., Gil‐Alana, L. A. and Lovcha, Y. (2017). The PPP hypothesis revisited: Evidence using a multivariate long memory model. forthcoming, Empirical Economics Letters.

Caporale, G.M. and Gil-Alana, L.A. (2018a). Unemployment in Africa: A Fractional Integration approach. South African Journal of Economics, 86(1), 76-81.

Caporale, G.M. and Gil-Alana, L.A. (2018b). The asymmetric behaviour of Spanish unemployment persistence. Economics Bullettin, 38(1), 98-104.

Cekic, A. (2016). Unemployment hysteresis with Fourier structural break unit root test: The case of Turkey. Journal of Applied Research in Finance and Economics, 2(3), 14-19.

Chang, T., Lee, K.,Nieh, C and Wei, C. (2005). An empirical note on testing hysteresis in unemployment for ten European countries: panel SURADF approach, Applied Economics Letters, 12:14,881-886, DOI: 10.1080/13504850500365871

Chang, T (2011) Hysteresis in unemployment for 17 OECD countries: stationarity test with a Fourier function. Econ Model 28:2208–2214.

Cheng, K.M., Durmaz, N., Kim, H., Michael, L. and Stern, M.L. (2012) Hysteresis vs. natural rate of US unemployment. Econ Model 29(2):428–434. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2011.11.012

Cheng, S.-C., Wu, T., Lee, K.-C., & Chang, T. (2014). Flexible Fourier unit root test of unemployment for PIIGS countries. Economic Modeling, 36, 142–148.

Cochrane, J. 1991, ‘A critique of the application of unit root tests’, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 15, pp. 275–84.

Cuestas, J.C. and Gil-Alana, L.A. (2017). Unemployment rate cycles in Europe. Applied Economic Letters, 24(2), 136-139.

Dickey, P.A. and Fuller, W.A. (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time-series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74(366):427–431. doi:10.2307/2286348

Dickey, D.A., Fuller, W.A. (1981). Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Econometrica, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 1057ot”, 1 doi: 10.2307/1912517.

DeJong, D. N., Nankervis, J. C., Savin, N. E. and Whiteman, C. H. 1992, ‘The power problems of unit root tests in time series with autoregressive errors’, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 53, pp. 323–43.

Dursun, G. (2017). Unemployment hysteresis in Central and Eastern European countries: Further evidence from Fourier unit root test. Rome: Econ-World2017. Rome Proceedings.

Enders, W. and Lee, J. (2012a). A unit root test using a Fourier series to approximate smooth breaks. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 74: 574-599.

Enders, W. and Lee, J. (2012b). The flexible Fourier form and Dickey-Fuller-type unit root tests. Economic Letters, 117: 196-199.

Fosten, J. and Ghoshray, A. (2011). Dynamic persistence in the unemployment rate of OECD countries. Econ Model 28(3): 948–954.

Friedman, M. (1968). The role of monetary policy. American Economic Review, 58, 1–17.

Furuoka, F. (2011). Is GDP in ASEAN countries stationary? New evidence from panel unit root tests. Economics Bulletin, 31, 1391–1400.

Furuoka, F. (2012). Unemployment hysteresis in the East Asia-Pacific region: New evidence from MADF and SURADF test. Asia Pacific Economic Literature, 26, 133–143.

Furuoka, F. (2014). Are unemployment rates stationary in Asia-Pacific countries? New findings from Fourier ADF test. Economic Research, 27(1): 34-45.

Furuoka, F. (2015a). Unemployment hysteresis in the Nordic Kitten: Evidence from five Estonian regions. Panoeconomicus, 62, 5: 631-642.

Furuoka, F. (2015b). Are unemployment rates in the post-communist economies stationary? Empirical Evidence from Central Asia. Economic Studies, 24(1).

Furuoka, F. (2017a). A new approach to testing unemployment hysteresis. Empirical Economics, 53(3), 1253-1280.

Furuoka, F. (2017b). Unemployment dynamics in the Asia-Pacific region: A Preliminary investigation. The Singapore Economic Review, 62(5), 983-1016.

Garcia-Cintado A, Romero-Avila D, Usabiaga C (2015) Can the hysteresis hypothesis in Spanish regional unemployment be beaten? New evidence from unit root tests with breaks. Economic Modelling, 47:244–252.

Gil‐Alana, L. A. (2001). The persistence of unemployment in the USA and Europe in terms of fractionally ARIMA models. Applied Economics, 33: 1263‐1269.

Gil‐Alana, L. A. (2002). Modelling the persistence of unemployment in Canada. International Review of Applied Economics, 16: 465‐478.

Gil-Alana, L.A., Ozdemir, Z.A. and Tansel, A. (2019). Long memory in Turkish unemployment rates. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(1), 201-217.

Gomes, F., & da Silva, C. G. (2008). Hysteresis vs. natural rate of unemployment in Brazil and Chile. Applied Economics Letters, 15, 53–56.

Guris, B., Tiftikcigil, B. Y. and Tirasoglu, M. (2017). Testing for unemployment hysteresis in turkey: evidence from nonlinear unit root tests. Quality and Quantity, 51(1), 35-46.

Im, K.-S., Pesaran, H. and Shin, Y. 1997 (rev.), ‘Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels’, Working Paper no. 9526, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge.

International Monetary Fund (2018), Regional Economic Outlook Sub-Saharan Africa: Capital Flows and the Future of Work, Washington DC.

Jaeger A, Parkinson M (1994). Some evidence on hysteresis in unemployment rates. European Economic Review, 38:329–342.

Jiang, Y., Cai, Y., Peng, Y. and Chang, T. (2018). Testing Hysteresis in Unemployment in G7 Countries Using Quantile Unit Root Test with both Sharp Shifts and Smooth Breaks, Social Indicators Research, DOI: 10.1007/s11205-018-1948-6

Khraief, S. and, Azam, M. (2018). Are unemployment rates in OECD countries stationary? Evidence from univariate and panel unit root tesrs. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2018.08.021

Klinger, S., and E. Weber. 2016. Detecting Unemployment Hysteresis: A Simultaneous Unobserved Components Model with Markov Switching. Economics Letters 144: 115–118. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2016.04.027.

Lucas, R and Sargent, T (1978). After Keynesian Macroeconomics, After the Philips Curve: Persistence of High Inflation and High Unemployment. Conference Series No. 19, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.

Leon-Ledesma, M. (2002). Unemployment hysteresis in the US states and the EU: A panel approach. Bulletin of Economic Research, 54: 95-103.

Levin, A., Lin, C.F., 1992, Unit Root Test in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties, Discussion Paper, 92-93, Department of Economics, University of California at San Diego.

Li, J.P., Ranjbar, O. and Chang, T. (2017). Unemployment hysteresis in PIIGS countries: a new test with both sharp and smooth breaks. The Singapore Economic Review, Vol. 62, No. 05, pp. 1165-1177, doi: 10.1142/s0217590815500782.

Marjanovic, G., Maksimovic, L. and Stanisic, N. (2015). Hysteresis and the NAIRU: the case of countries in transition. Prague Economic Papers, 2015(5), 503-515.

Marques, A.M., Lima, G.T. and Troster, V. (2017). Unemployment persistence in OECD countries after the Great recession. Economic Modelling, 64, 105-116.

Meng, M., Strazicich, M.C. and Lee, J. (2017). Hysteresis in unemployment? Evidence from linear and nonlinear unit root tests and tests with non-normal errors. Empirical Economics, 53(4), 1399-1414.

Munir, Q. and Ching, K. S. (2015). Revisiting the hysteresis hypothesis in unemployment in selected emerging economies. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(3): 22.

Mitchell, W. F. (1993). Testing for unit roots and persistence in OECD unemployment. Applied Econometrics, 25, 1489–1501.

Perron, P. (1989). The Great Crash, the oil price shocks and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica, 57: 1361-1401.

Perron, P. (2006). Dealing with structural breaks. Palgrave Handbook of Econometrics, 1, 278-352.

Phelps, E. S. (1967). Phillips curves, expectation of inflation and optimal unemployment. Economica, 34, 254–281.

Phelps, E. (1968). Money wage dynamics and labor market equilibrium. J Polit Econ 76:678–711.

Phelps, E. S. (1972). Inflation and unemployment theory. London: Macmillan.

Phelps, E. S. (1994). Structural slumps: The modern equilibrium theory of unemployment, interest rate and assets. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Phillips, P. C. D., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrica, 75, 335–346.

Song, F. M., & Wu, Y. (1998). Hysteresis in unemployment: Evidence from OECD countries. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 38, 181–192.

Srinivasan, N., Mitra, P. (2012) “Hysteresis in Unemployment: Factor Fiction?, Economics Letters, Vol. 115, No. 3, pp. 419–422, doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2011.12.070.

Xie, H., Chang, T., Grigorescu, A. and Hung, K. (2018). Revisit hysteresis unemployment in Eastern Europe countries using Quantile regression. Ekonomický časopis, 66, 2018, č. 5, s. 522 – 537.

World Bank (2014) Youth Unemployment in Sub-Saharan Africa, Washington DC: World Bank Publications.

Zivot, E. and Andrews, D.W.K. (1992). Further evidence on Great Crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Journal of Bus. Econ. Stat. 10: 251–270.