Demand adjusted capital input and potential output in the context of U.S. economic growth

Bitros, George C. (2019): Demand adjusted capital input and potential output in the context of U.S. economic growth.

Abstract

Two alternative measures of demand adjusted capital input for the U.S. non-farm private business sector are derived and their differential impacts on the potential supply of output are compared to those obtained using the unadjusted index of capital input published by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). The results show that, allowing for the demand pressure on the fixed assets of firms, leads to three effects. It raises the level of estimated potential output well above CBO’s estimates; with the exception of the 1990s, the estimated growth rates turn out to be higher than those computed by CBO; and, lastly, the long term trend of the growth rates with and without the demand adjustment to the capital input is sloping downwards. The latter finding was not unexpected since aggregate demand, as reflected in the utilization rate of fixed assets by firms, has been trending downwards throughout the postwar period. Drawing on these findings it is concluded that the path to secular stagnation that the U.S. economy is following in the postwar period is not due solely to headwinds on the supply side. To some degree, perhaps significant, the deceleration in the expansion of productive capacity as well as in the intensity of its utilization is due to the declining long term aggregate demand.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Potential output, capital input, capital stock, economic growth, economic growth headwinds, secular stagnation
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General > E01 - Measurement and Data on National Income and Product Accounts and Wealth ; Environmental Accounts; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E22 - Investment ; Capital ; Intangible Capital ; Capacity; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O47 - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth ; Aggregate Productivity ; Cross-Country Output Convergence

References

Bitros, G. C., (2019a), “Potential output, capital input and U.S. economic growth,” https://www.dept.aueb.gr/sites/default/files/econ/dokimia/wp-03-2019-Bitros-200419.pdf.

Calvo, G., (1975), “Efficient and optimal utilization of capital services,” American Economic Review, 65, 181–186.

Chatterjee, S., (2005), “Capital utilization, economic growth and convergence,” Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 29, 2093–2124.

Dutt, A. K., (2006), “Aggregate Demand, Aggregate Supply and Economic Growth,” International Review of Applied Economics, 20, 319–336.

Dutt, A. K., (2010), “Reconciling the growth of aggregate demand and aggregate supply,” in M. Setterfield (ed.), Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Growth, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 220–240.

Dutt, A. K., Ross, J., (2007), “Aggregate demand shocks and economic growth,” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 18, 75–99.

Fazzari, S. M., Ferri, P. E., Greenberg, E. G., Variato, A. M., (2013), “Aggregate demand, instability, and growth,” Review of Keynesian Economics, 1, 1–21.

Ferri, P., Fazzari, S. M., Greenberg, E., Variato, A. M., (2011), “Aggregate demand, Harrod’s instability and fluctuations,” Computational Economics, 38, 209–220.

Gordon, R. J., (2014), “US Economic Growth is Over: The Short Run meets the Long Run,” in THINK TANK 20: Growth, Convergence and Income Distribution: The Road from the Brisbane G-20 Summit, https://www.brookings.edu/.../2016/07/tt20-united-states-economic-growth-gordon.pdf.

-------------------, (2015), Beyond the Rainbow: The Rise and Fall of Growth in the American Standard of Living, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Harrod, R.F., (1939), “An essay in dynamic theory,” Economic Journal, 49, 14–33.

Hulten, C. R., (1986), “Productivity Change, Capacity Utilization, and the Sources of Efficiency Growth,” Journal of Econometrics, 33, 31–50.

Kahn, R. F., (1959). "Exercises in the analysis of growth," Oxford Economic Papers, 11, 143-56.

Kalecki, M., (1971), Selected Essays on the Dynamics of the Capitalist Economy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Keynes, J. M., (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Robinson, J., (1962). Essays in the Theory of Economic Growth, London: Macmillan.

Schultze, C. L., (1963), “Uses of Capacity Measures for Short-Run Economic Analysis,” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 53, 293–308.

Shaikh, A., (2009), “Economic policy in a growth context: a classical synthesis of Keynes and Harrod,” Metroeconomica, 60, 455–494.

Skott, P., Zipperer, B., (2012), “An empirical evaluation of three post-Keynesian models,” Intervention: European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies, 9, 277–308.

Summers, L. H., (2013), “IMF Fourteen Annual Research in Honor of Stanley Fisher,” in Http://larrysummers.com/imf-fourteen-annual-research-in-honor-of-stanley-fisher/.

--------------, (2014), “U.S. Economic Prospects: Secular Stagnation, Hysteresis, and the Zero Lower Bound,” Business Economics, 49, 65-73.

Wen, Y., (1998), “Capacity utilization under increasing returns to scale,” Journal of Economic Theory, 81, 7–36.