Who Said or What Said? Estimating Ideological Bias in Views Among Economists

Javdani, Moshen and Chang, Ha-Joon (2019): Who Said or What Said? Estimating Ideological Bias in Views Among Economists.

Abstract

There exists a long-standing debate about the influence of ideology in economics. Surprisingly, however, there is no concrete empirical evidence to examine this critical issue. Using an online randomized controlled experiment involving economists in 19 countries, we examine the effect of ideological bias on views among economists. Participants were asked to evaluate statements from prominent economists on different topics, while source attribution for each statement was randomized without participants’ knowledge. For each statement, participants either received a mainstream source, an ideologically different less-/non-mainstream source, or no source. We find that changing source attributions from mainstream to less-/non-mainstream, or removing them, significantly reduces economists’ reported agreement with statements. This contradicts the image economists have of themselves, with 82% of participants reporting that in evaluating a statement one should only pay attention to its content. Using a framework of Bayesian updating we examine two competing hypotheses as potential explanations for these results: unbiased Bayesian updating versus ideologically-/authority-biased Bayesian updating. While we find no evidence in support of unbiased updating, our results are consistent with biased Bayesian updating. More specifically, we find that changing/removing sources (1) has no impact on economists’ reported confidence with their evaluations; (2) similarly affects experts/non-experts in relevant areas; and (3) has substantially different impacts on economists with different political orientations. Finally, we find significant heterogeneity in our results by gender, country, PhD completion country, research area, and undergraduate major, with patterns consistent with the existence of ideological bias.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Ideology, ideological bias, authority bias, Bayesian updating, views among economists
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A11 - Role of Economics ; Role of Economists ; Market for Economists; A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A14 - Sociology of Economics; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C93 - Field Experiments; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness

References

Reference: [1] Abadie, A., Athey, S., Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. (2017). When should you adjust standard errors for clustering? (No. w24003). National Bureau of Economic Research.

[2] Allgood, S., Bosshardt, W., van der Klaauw, W., & Watts, M. (2012). Is economics coursework, or majoring in economics, associated with different civic behaviors? The Journal of Economic Education, 43(3), 248-268.

[3] Althusser, L. (1976). Essays on ideology. Verso Books.

[4] Backhouse, R. E. (2010). The puzzle of modern economics: science or ideology? Cambridge University Press.

[5] Bartels, L. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political behavior, 24(2), 117-150.

[6] Bar-Tal, Y., & Jarymowicz, M. (2010). The effect of gender on cognitive structuring: who are more biased, men or women?. Psychology, 1(02), 80.

[7] Bertrand M., & E. Duflo (2017). “Field experiments on discrimination” In Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, Vol. 1, pp. 309-393, North-Holland.

[8] Beyer, K. M., & Pühringer, S. (2019). Divided we stand? Professional consensus and political conflict in academic economics (No. 94). ICAE Working Paper Series.

[9] Boland, L. A. (1991). Current views on economic positivism. Companion to contemporary economic thought, 88-104.

[10] Carter, J. R., & Irons, M. D. (1991). Are economists different, and if so, why?. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(2), 171-177.

[11] Chang, H. (2014). Economics: The User's Guide.

[12] Coase, R. H. (1994). How Should Economists Choose? in: Ronald H Coase (ed.) Essays on Economics and Economists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

[13] Colander, D. (2005). The making of an economist redux. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), 175-198.

[14] Colander, D., & Klamer, A. (1987). The making of an economist. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1(2), 95-111.

[15] Currie, J., Lin, W., & Meng, J. (2014). Addressing antibiotic abuse in China: An experimental audit study. Journal of development economics, 110, 39-51.

[16] Dobb, M. (1973). Theories of value and distribution: ideology and economic theory. Cambridge UniversityPress, Cambridge.

[17] DeGroot, M. H. (1970). Optimal Statistical Decisions, New York: McGraw-Hill.

[18] Eagleton T. (1991). Ideology: an introduction. Cambridge.

[19] Fine, B., & Milonakis, D. (2009). From economics imperialism to freakonomics: The shifting boundaries between economics and other social sciences. Routledge.

[20] Fischle, M. (2000). Mass Response to the Lewinsky Scandal: Motivated Reasoning or Bayesian Updating?. Political Psychology, 21(1), 135-159.

[21] Fisher, I. (1919). Economists in Public Service: Annual Address of the President. The American Economic Review, 9(1), 5–21.

[22] Fisman, R., & O’Neill, M. (2009). Gender differences in beliefs on the returns to effort evidence from the world values survey. Journal of Human Resources, 44(4), 858-870.

[23] Foucault, M. (1972). The archeology of knowledge, trans. AM Sheridan Smith. London: Tavistock.

[24] Frank, B., & Schulze, G. G. (2000). Does economics make citizens corrupt?. Journal of economic behavior & organization, 43(1), 101-113.

[25] Frank, R. H., Gilovich, T., & Regan, D. T. (1993). Does studying economics inhibit cooperation?. Journal of economic perspectives, 7(2), 159-171.

[26] Frank, R. H., Gilovich, T. D., & Regan, D. T. (1996). Do economists make bad citizens?. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(1), 187-192.

[27] Frankfurter, G. & Mcgoun, E. (1999). Ideology and the theory of financial economics. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 39. 159-177.

[28] Freedman C. (2016). In search of the two-handed economist: ideology, methodology and marketing in economics. Springer.

[29] Frey, B. S., Pommerehne, W. W., & Gygi, B. (1993). Economics indoctrination or selection? Some empirical results. The Journal of Economic Education, 24(3), 271-281.

[30] Frey, B. S., Pommerehne, W. W., Schneider, F., & Gilbert, G. (1984). Consensus and dissension among economists: An empirical inquiry. The American Economic Review, 74(5), 986-994.

[31] Friedman M. (1953). Essays in positive economics. University of Chicago Press.

[32] Fryer, R. G., Harms, P., & Jackson, M. O. (2018). Updating beliefs when evidence is open to interpretation: Implications for bias and polarization.

[33] Fuchs, V. R. (1996). Economics, values, and health care reform. American Economic Review, 86(1), 1-24.

[34] Fuchs, V. R., Krueger, A. B., & Poterba, J. M. (1998). Economists' views about parameters, values, and policies: Survey results in labor and public economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(3), 1387-1425.

[35] Fullbrook, E. (2008). Pluralist economics. Palgrave Macmillan.

[36] Fullbrook, E. (2003). The crisis in economics. London: Routledge.

[37] Galbraith, J. K. (1989). Ideology and economic reality. Challenge, 32(6), 4-9.

[38] Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2006). Media bias and reputation. Journal of political Economy, 114(2), 280-316.

[39] Gerber, A., & Green, D. (1999). Misperceptions about perceptual bias. Annual review of political science, 2(1), 189-210.

[40] Gordon, R., & Dahl G. B. (2013). Views among economists: professional vonsensus or point-counterpoint? American Economic Review, 103(3), 629–635.

[41] Halligan L. (2013). Time to stop this pretence – economics is not science, The Telegraph, October 19.

[42] Harcourt, G. C. (1969). Some Cambridge controversies in the theory of capital. Journal of Economic Literature, 7(2), 369-405.

[43] Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J., & Merrill, L. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological bulletin, 135(4), 555.

[44] Hodgson, G. M., & Jiang, S. (2007). The economics of corruption and the corruption of economics: an institutionalist perspective. Journal of Economic Issues, 41(4), 1043–1061.

[45] Hoover, K. R. (2003). Economics as ideology: Keynes, Laski, Hayek, and the creation of contemporary politics. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

[46] Horowitz, M., & Hughes, R. (2018). Political identity and economists’ perceptions of capitalist crises. Review of Radical Political Economics, 50(1), 173-193.

[47] Ioannidis, J. P., Stanley, T. D., & Doucouliagos, H. (2017). The power of bias in economics research. The Economic Journal, 127(605), F236-F265.

[48] Jelveh, Z., Bruce K., & Naidu S. (2018). Political language in economics. Columbia Business School Research Paper No. 14-57.

[49] Krugman, P. (2009). The conscience of a liberal. WW Norton & Company.

[50] Lawson, T. (2012). Mathematical modelling and ideology in the economics Academy: competing explanations of the failings of the modern discipline? Economic Thought, 1(1, 2012).

[51] List, J. A., Sadoff, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). So you want to run an experiment, now what? Some simple rules of thumb for optimal experimental design. Experimental Economics, 14(4), 439.

[52] MacCoun R. J., & Paletz S. (2009) Citizens' perceptions of ideological bias in research on public policy controversies. Political Psychology 30(1),43-65.

[53] MacCoun, R. (1998). Biases in the interpretation and use of research results. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 259–287.

[54] Maniadis, Z., & Tufano, F. (2017). The research reproducibility crisis and economics of science. The Economic Journal, 127(605), F200-F208.

[55] Maniadis, Z., Tufano, F., & List, J. A. (2017). To replicate or not to replicate? Exploring reproducibility in economics through the lens of a model and a pilot study. The Economic Journal, 127(605), F209-F235.

[56] Maniadis, Z., Tufano, F., & List, J. A. (2014). One swallow doesn't make a summer: New evidence on anchoring effects. American Economic Review, 104(1), 277-90.

[57] Mayer, T. (2001). The role of ideology in disagreements among economists: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Economic Methodology, 8(2), 253-273.

[58] Marwell, G., & Ames, R. E. (1981). Economists free ride, does anyone else?: Experiments on the provision of public goods, IV. Journal of public economics, 15(3), 295-310.

[59] Merton R. K. (1973). The sociology of science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

[60] Meyers-Levy, J. (1986). Gender differences in information processing: A selectivity interpretation (Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University).

[61] McCloskey, D. (2017). The Many Transgressions of Deirdre McCloskey, Institute for New Economic Thinking, June 28, 2017, accessed 30 January 2019 at https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/the-many-transgressions-of-deirdre-mccloskey

[62] Milberg W. S. (1998). “Ideology” in The Handbook of Economic Methodology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 243-246. [63] Miller, J., & Katz, D. (2018). Gender differences in perception of workplace experience among anesthesiology residents. The journal of education in perioperative medicine, 20(1).Moretti, E. (2011). Social learning and peer effects in consumption: Evidence from movie sales. The Review of Economic Studies, 78(1), 356-393.

[64] Modigliani, F. (1977). The Monetarist Controversy, or, Should We Forsake Stabilization Policies?. American Economic Review, 67:1-19.

[65] Morgan, J. (Ed.). (2015). What is neoclassical economics?: debating the origins, meaning and significance. Routledge.

[66] Myrdal, G. (1954). The political element in the development of economic thought. Harvard University Press.

[67] Önder, A. S., & Terviö, M. (2015). Is economics a house divided? Analysis of citation networks. Economic Inquiry, 53(3), 1491-1505.

[68] Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press.

[69] Popper, K. R. (1962). On the sources of knowledge and of ignorance.

[70] Rabin, M., & Schrag, J. L. (1999). First impressions matter: a model of confirmatory bias. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), 37-82.

[71] Ragins, B. R., Townsend, B., & Mattis, M. (1998). Gender gap in the executive suite: CEOs and female executives report on breaking the glass ceiling. Academy of Management Perspectives, 12(1), 28-42.

[72] Riach, P., & Rich J. (2002). Field experiments of discrimination in the market place. The economic journal 112, no. 483.

[73] Rivlin, A. M. (1987). Economics and the political process. The American Economic Review, 1-10.

[74] Robinson, J. (1973). Ideology and analysis. Collected Economic Papers, 5, 254-61.

[75] Romer, P. M. (2015). Mathiness in the theory of economic growth. The American Economic Review, 105(5), 89-93.

[76] Rothbarb M. (1960). “The mantle Issues, of science” In Scientism and Values. Princeton NJ.

[77] Rubinstein, A. (2006). A sceptic's comment on the study of economics. The Economic Journal, 116(510), C1-C9.

[78] Saint-Paul, G. (2018). The possibility of ideological bias in structural macroeconomic models. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 10(1), 216-241.

[79] Samuels W. J. (1992). “Ideology in economics” In Essays on the Methodology and Discourse of Economics, pp. 233-248. Palgrave Macmillan UK.

[80] Schumpeter, J. A. (1949). Science and ideology. The American Economic Review, 39(2), 346–359.

[81] Stigler, G. J. (1965). The economist and the state. The American Economic Review, 1-18.

[82] Stigler, G. J. (1960). The influence of events and policies on economic theory. The American economic review, 36-45.

[83] Stigler, G. J. (1959). The politics of political economists. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 522-532.

[84] Stiglitz J. E. (2002). There is no invisible hand. The Guardian, 20 December, accessed 14 August 2018 at https://www.theguardian.com/education/2002/dec/20/highereducation.uk1.

[85] Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755-769.

[86] Terviö, M. (2011). Divisions within academia: Evidence from faculty hiring and placement. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(3), 1053-1062.

[87] Thompson, H. (1997). Ignorance and ideological hegemony: A critique of neoclassical economics. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 8(4), 291-305.

[88] Tobin, J. (1976). “Is Friedman a monetarist?”, in J. Stein (ed.), Monetarism, Amsterdam, North Holland, pp. 332–6.

[89] van Dalen, H. P. (2019). Values of Economists Matter in the Art and Science of Economics. Kyklos.

[90] Van Gunten, T. S., Martin, J. L., & Teplitskiy, M. (2016). Consensus, polarization, and alignment in the economics profession. Sociological Science, 3, 1028-1052.

[91] Wang, L., Malhotra, D., & Murnighan, J. K. (2011). Economics education and greed. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(4), 643-660.

[92] Wiles, P. (1979). Ideology, methodology, and neoclassical economics. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 2(2), 155-180.

[93] Wolfers, J. (2013). Comments on Roger Gordon and Gordon Dahl’s ‘Views among Economists: Professional Consensus or Point-Counterpoint’. Unpublished comments delivered at the American Economic Association annual meeting, January 5, San Diego. http://tinyurl.com/gs9eyep.