Skouras, Thanos (2019): On a low-competitiveness country joining the Eurozone: Are there lessons from Greece?
PDF
MPRA_paper_94913.pdf Download (194kB) |
Abstract
Seven remaining states are presently on the Eurozone’s enlargement agenda: Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Sweden. Except Sweden, all these countries tend to have low competitiveness not only relative to Germany but also to most of the Eurozone countries (especially, Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg and the Netherlands). For countries adopting the euro, issues of political economy may have a decisive effect on the eventual outcome and largely determine their economic prospects within the Eurozone. The Greek experience shows that the intensity of partisan strife is certainly an important element to be taken into account in a far from easy assessment of how entry will likely affect the country's economic progress. The crucial issue that needs to be considered is whether entry will improve or worsen the prospects for a substantial gain in competitiveness. It is the assessment of how entry will affect the forces favoring reforms relative to those opposing them that should ultimately determine the decision to opt for early or delayed entry.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | On a low-competitiveness country joining the Eurozone: Are there lessons from Greece? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Competitiveness, Eurozone, Greece, exchange rate, euro crisis, leverage. |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F33 - International Monetary Arrangements and Institutions F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F45 - Macroeconomic Issues of Monetary Unions O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O52 - Europe |
Item ID: | 94913 |
Depositing User: | Thanos Skouras |
Date Deposited: | 11 Jul 2019 11:01 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 12:25 |
References: | Alivizatos, N.,Vourloumis, P., Gerapetritis, G., Ktistakis, I., Manos, S., and Spyropoulos,Ph.(2016), An Innovative Constitution for Greece. Bank of Greece (1998) “Report on Monetary Policy 1997-1998”, April, p.30. Garganas, N. (2000) “Mr. Garganas looks at the challenges for Greek monetary policy on the eve of euro-zone entry”, Euromoney International Bond Congress, February 15, London. Krugman, P. (1994) “Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession”, Foreign Affairs, March-April. Krugman, P. (1996) “Making Sense of the Competitiveness Debate”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol.12, No. 3. Papantoniou, Y.(2014), Στάσεις και Αποστάσεις, Εκδόσεις Παπαζήση, σ. 123. Simitis, C. and Stournaras, Y. (2012) “Greece did not cause the euro crisis”,The Guardian, www.guardian.co.uk, April 26. Skouras, T. (2016) “Competitiveness and its leverage in a currency union or how Germany gains from the euro”, Real-World Economics Review, issue no. 77, 40-49. Skouras,T.(2016) “Correcting The Euro’s Flawed Architecture Demands A Focus On Competitiveness Rather Than Productivity”, Social Europe, November 1. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/94913 |