Fedotenkov, Igor and Idrisov, Georgy (2019): A supply-demand model of the size of public sector and Wagner's law.
PDF
MPRA_paper_94973.pdf Download (281kB) |
Abstract
In this paper, we develop a supply-demand model for the public sector, measured as governments' tax revenues divided by GDP. We use a political equilibrium with a rule of majority. The model takes into account inefficiencies caused by taxes and includes costs associated with public goods provision to consumers. We show that the size of the public sector depends on the median voter's income, size of population, costs associated with taxpaying, and quality of institutions, which reflect costs of public goods provision. The estimates for the OECD countries (2000-2017), using dynamic panel model techniques, are in line with the theoretical predictions; however, they do not confirm Wagner's law. Our estimates suggest that the size of the government sector grows as income increases, but at a slower rate. We show that the quality of institutions matters: a more effective government raises the share of public sector; better regulations, which permit and promote private sector development, reduce it.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | A supply-demand model of the size of public sector and Wagner's law |
English Title: | A supply-demand model of the size of public sector and Wagner's law |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Size of public sector; tax burden; median voter; Wagner's law; political equilibrium |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D60 - General D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H30 - General H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H41 - Public Goods I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy ; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems > P16 - Political Economy P - Economic Systems > P4 - Other Economic Systems > P43 - Public Economics ; Financial Economics P - Economic Systems > P4 - Other Economic Systems > P48 - Political Economy ; Legal Institutions ; Property Rights ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Regional Studies |
Item ID: | 94973 |
Depositing User: | Igor Fedotenkov |
Date Deposited: | 09 Jul 2019 20:35 |
Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2019 16:14 |
References: | Afonso, A. and J. Alves (2017). Reconsidering Wagner's law: Evidence from the functions of the government. Applied Economics Letters 24 (5), 346-350. Akitoby, B., B. Clements, S. Gupta, and G. Inchauste (2006). Public spending, voracity, and Wagner's law in developing countries. European Journal of Political Economy 22 (4), 908-924. Arellano, M. and S. Bond (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies 58 (2), 277-297. Atasoy, B.-S. and T.-H. Gur (2016). Does the Wagner's hypothesis hold for China? Evidence from static and dynamic analyses. Panoeconomicus 63 (1), 45-60. Berry, W. D. and D. Lowery (1987). Explaining the size of the public sector: Responsive and excessive government interpretations. The Journal of Politics 49 (2), 401-440. Bird, R. M., J. Martinez-Vazquez, B. Torgler, et al. (2014). Societal institutions and tax effort in developing countries. Annals of Economics and Finance 15 (1), 185-230. Brooks, C. and J. Manza (2008). Why welfare states persist: The importance of public opinion in democracies. University of Chicago Press. Chenery, H. B., M. Syrquin, and H. Elkington (1975). Patterns of development, 1950-1970, Volume 75. Oxford University Press London. Chletsos, M. and C. Kollias (1997). Testing Wagner's law using disaggregated public expenditure data in the case of Greece: 1958-93. Applied Economics 29 (3), 371-377. Courakis, A. S., F. Moura-Roque, and G. Tridimas (1993). Public expenditure growth in Greece and Portugal: Wagner's law and beyond. Applied Economics 25 (1), 125-134. De Simone, A. and M. G. Graziano (2004). The pure theory of public goods: The case of many commodities. Journal of Mathematical Economics 40 (7), 847-868. Diamantaras, D. and R. P. Gilles (1996). The pure theory of public goods: Efficiency, decentralization, and the core. International Economic Review 37 (4), 851-860. Dornbusch, R. and S. Edwards (1990). Macroeconomic populism. Journal of Development Economics 32 (2), 247-277. Durevall, D. and M. Henrekson (2011). The futile quest for a grand explanation of long-run government expenditure. Journal of Public Economics 95 (7-8), 708-722. Ellickson, B. (1973). A generalization of the pure theory of public goods. The American Economic Review 63 (3), 417-432. Elmelund-Praestekaer, C. and P. Emmenegger (2013). Strategic re-framing as a vote winner: Why vote-seeking governments pursue unpopular reforms. Scandinavian Political Studies 36 (1), 23-42. Funashima, Y. and K. Hiraga (2017). Wagner's law, fiscal discipline, and intergovernmental transfer: Empirical evidence at the US and German state levels. International Tax and Public Finance 24 (4), 652-677. Granger, C. W. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37, 424-438. Hinrichs, H. H. (1965). Determinants of government revenue shares among less-developed countries. The Economic Journal 75 (29), 546-556. Irandoust, M. (2019). Wagner on government spending and national income: A new look at an old relationship. Journal of Policy Modeling 41, 636-646. Jalles, J. (2019). Wagner's law and governments' functions: Granularity matters. Journal of Economic Studies 46, 446-466. Kahneman, D., J. L. Knetsch, and R. H. Thaler (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1), 193-206. Katrakilidis, C. and P. Tsaliki (2009). Further evidence on the causal relationship between government spending and economic growth: The case of Greece, 1958-2004. Acta Oeconomica 59 (1), 57-78. Kelley, A. C. (1976). Demographic change and the size of the government sector. Southern Economic Journal 43 (2), 1056-1066. Lamartina, S. and A. Zaghini (2011). Increasing public expenditure: Wagner's law in OECD countries. German Economic Review 12 (2), 149-164. Lindahl, E. (1958). Just taxation - a positive solution. In Classics in the theory of public finance, pp. 168-176. Springer. Magazzino, C. (2012). Wagner versus Keynes: Public spending and national income in Italy. Journal of Policy Modeling 34 (6), 890-905. Magazzino, C., L. Giolli, and M. Mele (2015). Wagner's law and Peacock and Wiseman's displacement effect in European Union countries: A panel data study. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 5 (3), 812-819. Mahdavi, S. (2008). The level and composition of tax revenue in developing countries: Evidence from unbalanced panel data. International Review of Economics & Finance 17 (4), 607-617. Mas-Colell, A. (1980). Efficiency and decentralization in the pure theory of public goods. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 94 (4), 625-641. Moore, S. (2016). Wagner in Ireland: An econometric analysis. The Economic and Social Review 47 (1, Spring), 69-103. Mueller, D. C. (2003). Public choice III. Cambridge University Press. Pereira, L. B. and F. DallAcqua (1991). Economic populism versus Keynes: reinterpreting budget deficit in Latin America. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 14 (1), 29-38. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Piketty, T. (2015). About capital in the twenty-first century. American Economic Review 105 (5), 48-53. Pistoresi, B., A. Rinaldi, and F. Salsano (2017). Government spending and its components in Italy, 1862-2009: Drivers and policy implications. Journal of Policy Modeling 39 (6), 1117-1140. Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics 36 (4), 387-389. Sedrakyan, G. S. and L. Varela-Candamio (2019). Wagner's law vs. Keynes' hypothesis in very different countries (Armenia and Spain). Journal of Policy Modeling 41, 747-762. Shin, K. (1969). International difference in tax ratio. The Review of Economics and Statistics 51 (2), 213-220. Tarschys, D. (1975). The growth of public expenditures: Nine modes of explanation. Scandinavian political studies 10 (A10), 9-31. Wagner, A. (1883). Finanzwissenschaft, Volume 4. CF Winter. Wagner, A. (1892). Grundlegung der politischen Okonomie, Volume 1. CF Winter. Weiss, S. J. (1969). Factors affecting the government revenue share in less developed countries. Social and Economic Studies 18 (4), 348-364. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/94973 |