Gozgor, Giray and Tiwari, Aviral and Khraief, Naceur and Shahbaz, Muhammad (2019): Dependence Structure between Business Cycles and CO2 Emissions in the U.S.: Evidence from the Time-Varying Markov-Switching Copula Models.
PDF
MPRA_paper_95971.pdf Download (1MB) |
Abstract
The relationship between CO2 emissions and economic growth is well-examined. However, there is a gap in the literature to examine the nexus by regime-switching models. For this purpose, this paper examines the interdependence relations between CO2 emissions and the industrial production index as a measure of business cycles at the monthly frequency in the United States. We use a new approach to modeling dependence between the underlying variables over time, combining the time-varying copula and the Markov switching models. We find that there is a significant dependence structure between business cycles and CO2 emissions, which has a regime-switching feature, for the period from January 1973 to January 2017. Specifically, during the recession episodes, we deduce that until 1982, the high dependence regime with the Gaussian copula is valid. Since the beginning of 1983, the low dependence structure regime becomes prominent.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Dependence Structure between Business Cycles and CO2 Emissions in the U.S.: Evidence from the Time-Varying Markov-Switching Copula Models |
English Title: | Dependence Structure between Business Cycles and CO2 Emissions in the U.S.: Evidence from the Time-Varying Markov-Switching Copula Models |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | carbon dioxide emissions; business cycles; Markov-switching models; copula models; regime-dependency |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics |
Item ID: | 95971 |
Depositing User: | Dr Muhammad Shahbaz |
Date Deposited: | 14 Sep 2019 16:12 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 09:15 |
References: | Anderson, T.W., & Darling, D.A. Asymptotic theory of certain" goodness of fit" criteria based on stochastic processes. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1952; 23 (2): 193–212. Atasoy, B.S. Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis across the U.S.: Evidence from panel mean group estimators. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017; 77: 731–47. Berkowitz, J. Testing density forecasts, with applications to risk management. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2001; 19 (4): 465–74. Bowen, A., & Stern, N. Environmental policy and the economic downturn. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2010; 26 (2): 137–63. British Petroleum (BP). BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2017; British Petroleum: London. Burke, P.J., Shahiduzzaman, M., & Stern, D.I. Carbon dioxide emissions in the short run: The rate and sources of economic growth matter. Global Environmental Change 2015; 33: 109–21. Cohen, G., Jalles, J.T, Loungani, P., & Marto, R. Emissions and growth: Trends and cycles in globalized world. International Monetary Fund Working Paper 2017; No. 17/191, International Monetary Fund: Washington D.C. Cohen, G., Jalles, J.T., Loungani, P., & Marto, R. The long-run decoupling of emissions and output: Evidence from the largest emitters. Energy Policy2018, 118: 58–68. Congregado, E., Feria–Gallardo, J., Golpe, A.A., & Iglesias, J. The environmental Kuznets curve and CO2 emissions in the USA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2016; 23 (18): 18407–20. Da Silva Filho, O.C., Ziegelmann, F.A., & Dueker, M.J. Modeling dependence dynamics through copulas with regime switching. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 2012, 50 (3): 346–56. Dickey, D.A., & Fuller, W.A. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1979; 74 (366): 427–31. Doda B. Evidence on business cycles and CO2 emissions. Journal of Macroeconomics 2014; 40: 214–27. Eng, Y–K., & Wong, C–Y. Tapered US carbon emissions during good times: What’s old, what’s new? Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2017; 24 (32): 25047–60. Engle, R.F. Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica 1982; 50 (4): 987–1007. Fischer, C., & Heutel, G. Environmental macroeconomics: Environmental policy, business cycles, and directed technical change. Annual Review of Resource Economics 2013; 5 (1): 197–210. Fischer, C., & Springborn, M. Emissions targets and the real business cycle: Intensity targets versus caps or taxes. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2011; 62 (3): 352–66. Gozgor, G. A new approach to the renewable energy-growth nexus: Evidence from the USA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2018, 25 (17): 16590–600. Gozgor, G., & Can, M. Export product diversification and the environmental Kuznets curve: Evidence from Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2016, 23 (21): 21594–603. Grossman, G.M., & Krueger, A.B. Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1995; 110 (2): 353–77. Heutel G. How should environmental policy respond to business cycles? Optimal policy under persistent productivity shocks. Review Economic Dynamics 2012; 15 (2): 244–64. Joe, H., & Xu, J. The estimation method of inference functions for margins for multivariate models. University of British Columbia Department of Statistics Technical Report, No. 166; 1996: Vancouver, BC. Jotzo, F., Burke, P.J., Wood, P.J., Macintosh, A., & Stern, D.I. Decomposing the 2010 global carbon dioxide emissions rebound. Nature Climate Change 2012; 2 (4): 213–4. Khan, H., Knittel, C.R., Metaxoglou, K., & Papineau, M. Carbon emissions and business cycles. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 2016, No. 22294, National Bureau of Economic Research: Cambridge, MA. Kim, C.J. Dynamic linear models with Markov-switching. Journal of Econometrics 1994; 60 (1–2): 1–22. Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P.C., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics 1992; 54 (1–3): 159–78. Lopez–Menendez, A.J., Perez, R., & Moreno, B. Environmental costs and renewable energy: Re-visiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Journal of Environmental Management 2014; 145: 368–73. Nelsen, R.B. An Introduction to Copulas. Second Edition 2006; Springer: New York, NY. Nelson, D.B. Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica1991; 59 (2): 347–70. Pao, H., & Tsai, C. CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in BRIC countries. Energy Policy 2010; 38 (12): 7850–60. Patton, A.J. Modelling asymmetric exchange rate dependence. International Economic Review 2006; 47 (2): 527–56. Peters, G.P., Marland, G., Le Quere, C., Boden, T., Canadell, J.G., & Raupach, M.R. Rapid growth in CO2 emissions after the 2008–2009 global financial crisis. Nature Climate Change 2012; 2 (1): 2–4. Phillips, P.C., & Perron, P. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 1988; 75 (2): 335–46. Rodríguez, M.J.D., Ares, A C., & de Lucas Santos, S. Cyclical fluctuation patterns and decoupling: Towards common EU-28 environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018; 175: 696–706. Schweizer, B., & Sklar, A. Probabilistic Metric Spaces. 1983; Dover Publications: Mineola, NY. Shahbaz, M., Shafiullah, M., Papavassiliou, V.G., & Hammoudeh, S. The CO2–growth nexus revisited: A nonparametric analysis for the G7 economies over nearly two centuries. Energy Economics 2017a; 65: 183–93. Shahbaz, M., Solarin, S.A., Hammoudeh, S., & Shahzad, S.J.H. Bounds testing approach to analyzing the environment Kuznets curve hypothesis with structural beaks: The role of biomass energy consumption in the United States. Energy Economics 2017b; 68: 548–65. Shahiduzzaman, M., & Layton, A. Changes in CO2 emissions over business cycle recessions and expansions in the United States: A decomposition analysis. Applied Energy 2015; 150: 25–35. Shahiduzzaman, M., & Layton, A. Decomposition analysis for assessing the United States 2025 emissions target: How big is the challenge? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017; 67: 372–83. Sheldon, T.L. Asymmetric effects of the business cycle on carbon dioxide emissions. Energy Economics 2017; 61: 289–97. Shuai, C., Chen, X., Wu, Y., Tan, Y., Zhang, Y., & Shen, L. Identifying the key impact factors of carbon emission in China: Results from a largely expanded pool of potential impact factors. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018; 175: 612–23. Thoma, M. Electrical energy usage over the business cycle. Energy Economics 2004; 26 (3): 463–85. Wang, Q., Zhao, M., Li, R., & Su, M. Decomposition and decoupling analysis of carbon emissions from economic growth: A comparative study of China and the United States of America. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018; 197: 178–84. World Bank. World Development Indicators, 2018; World Bank: Washington, D.C. York R. Asymmetric effects of economic growth and decline on CO2 emissions. Nature Climate Change 2012; 2 (11): 762–4. Zhao, X., Zhang, X., & Shao, S. Decoupling CO2 emissions and industrial growth in China over 1993–2013: The role of investment. Energy Economics 2016; 60: 275–92. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/95971 |