Patents in Theory and Practice: Empirical Results from Switzerland

Harabi, Najib (1996): Patents in Theory and Practice: Empirical Results from Switzerland.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate empirically the effectiveness of alternative mechanisms of protecting the competitive advantages of new or improved products and processes. The analysis is based on I survey I conducted among 358 firms in 127 different (four-digit) industries in Switzerland. The main results can be summarized as follows: 1) For process innovations lead time, and for product innovations, superior sales and service efforts are viewed as the most effective means of appropriation. 2)For both product and process innovations, patents are the least effective means of appropriation. In general, patents are viewed by R&D managers as an effective means of protecting the competitive advantages of new technolgy in the chemical, including the drug industries, in the synthetics and in some cases of the machinery and metal processing industries. In all other industries surveyed they are considered less affective. 3)Finally, the ability of competitors to "invent around" is seen as the most important constraint on the effectiveness of patents.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: German
• Keywords: patents, appropriabilty, intellectual property rights, Switzerland, innovations, Swiss firms, Swiss industry
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D21 - Firm Behavior: Theory; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O34 - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

References

Arrow, K.J. (1962a), "The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing", Review of Economic Studies, 29:155-73.

Arrow, K.J. (1962b), "Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention", in: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, ed. R.R. Nelson. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Basberg, B. L. (1987), "Patent and the Measurement of Technological Change: A Survey of the Literature", Research Policy, 16:131-141.

Benko, R.P. (1987), Protecting Intellectual Property Rights. Washington: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

Benko, R.P. (1988), "Intellectual Property Rights and the Uruguay Round", The World Economy, A Quarterly Journal on International Economic Affairs, 11: 217-231.

Bernhard, W., Krasser, R. (1986), Lehrbuch des Patentrechts - Recht der BRD, Europäisches und Internationales Patentrecht, 4. Auflage. München: C.H. Beck.

Besen, S.M., Raskind, L.J. (1991), "An Introduction to the Law and Economics of Intellectual Property", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5:3-27.

Bundesgesetz betreffend die Erfindungspatente vom 25. Juni 1954, hrsg. von der Bundeskanzlei, 1991. Bern: Eidgenössische Drucksachen- und Materialzentrale (zitiert PatG).

Butler, A. (1991), "The Uruguay Round, Switzerland, and Intellectual Property Rights", Geld, Währung und Konjunktur, Quartalsheft Nr. 4, Schweizerische Nationalbank S. 381-394.

Cheung, S.N.S. (1982), "Property Rights in Trade Secrets," Economic Inquiry, 20:40-53.

Cohen, W.M., (1995), "Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity“, in: Stoneman , P. (ed.) Handbook of The Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Oxford: Blackwell.

Cohen, W.M., Klepper, S. (1991), "Firm Size versus Diversity in the Achievement of Techno-logical Advance", in: Innovation and Technological Change: An International Com-parison, ed. Acs, Z.J. and Andretsch, D.B. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Conrad, C.A. (1983), "The Advantage of Being First and Competition Between Firms," International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1:353-364.

Dasgupta, P., Stoneman, P. (eds.) (1987), Economic Policy and Technological Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

David, P.A. (1992), "Intellectual Property Institutions and The Panda's Thumb. Patents, Copyrights, and Trade Secrets in Economic Theory and History", Discussion Papers Series CEPR No. 287. Stanford University.

Dolder, F. (1991), "Patentmanagement im Betrieb: Geheimhalten oder patentieren?", IO Management Zeitschrift, 60:64-68.

Dosi, G. (1988), "Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation", Journal of Economic Literature, 26:1120-1171.

Franke, J.F. (1993), "Die Bedeutung des Patentwesens im Innovationsprozess - Probleme und Verbesserungsmöglichkeiten, IFO-Studien Zeitschrift für empirische Wirtschaftsforschung, 39:307-327.

Friedman, D.D., Landes, W.M., Posner, R.A. (1991), "Some Economics of Trade Secret Law", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5:61-72.

Glazer, A. (1985), "The Advantage of Being First," American Economic Review, 75:473-480.

Gold, B. (1979), Productivity, Technology and Capital. Boston: Lexington Books.

Gomory, R.E., Schmitt, R.W. (1988), "Science and Product", Policy Forum, 27:1131-1231.

Halbherr, P., Harabi, N., Bachem, M. (1988), Die Schweizerische Wettbewerbsfähigkeit auf dem Prüfstand: Herausforderungen an Politik, Wirtschaft und Wissenschaft. Bern: Haupt.

Harabi, N. (1990), "Einflussfaktoren von Forschung und Entwicklung in der Schweizer Industrie. Ergebnisse einer schriftlichen Expertenbefragung". Arbeitspapier Nr. 13, Reihe D, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Institut der Universität Zürich.

Harabi, N. (1991a), "Innovation versus Imitation: Empirical Evidence from Swiss Firms". Arbeitspapier Nr. 15, Reihe D, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Institut der Universität Zürich.

Harabi, N. (1991b), "Determinanten des technischen Fortschritts - Eine empirische Analyse für die Schweiz". Arbeitspapier Nr. 16, Reihe D, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Institut der Universität Zürich.

Harabi, N. (1991c), "Einflussfaktoren von Forschung und Entwicklung in der Schweizer Industrie. Ergebnisse einer schriftlichen Expertenbefragung", Die Unternehmung - Schweizerische Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung und Praxis, 45:349-368.

Harabi, N. (1995a), "Sources of Technical Progress: Evidence from Swiss Industry”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 4:67-76.

Harabi, N. (1995b), "Appropriability of Technological Innovations: An Empirical Analysis". Research Policy, 24:981-992.

Harabi, N. (1995c) (ed.), Wettlauf um die Schweiz 2000. Zurich: vdf

Harabi, N. (1996) (ed.), Kreativität - Wirtschaft - Recht. Zurich: vdf

Harabi, N. (1997), "Facteurs déterminant la recherche et le développement dans l'industrie. Résultats d'une enquête sur l'industrie suisse", Revue Française de Gestion, No. 114 (Juin-Juillet-Aout)

Kaufer, E. (1970), Patente, Wettbewerb und technischer Fortschritt.. Bad Homburg.

Kaufer, E. (1989), The Economics of the Patent System. Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers.

Kern, W., Schröder, H.H. (1977), Forschung und Entwicklung in der Unternehmung. Reinbek: Rowohlt.

Kitch, E. W. (1977), "The Nature and Function of the Patent System", Journal of Law and Economics, 20:265-290.

Kitch, E. W. (1980), "The Law and Economics of Rights in Valuable Information", Journal of Legal Studies, 9:683-724.

Klemperer, P. (1987), "Entry Deterrence in Markets with Consumer Switching Costs," Economic Journal, 97: 99-117.

Levin, R.C. (1986), "A New Look at The Patent System", American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, 76:199-202.

Levin, R.C. and Reiss, P. C. (1988), "Cost-Reducing and Demand-Creating R&D with Spillovers", Rand Journal of Economics, 19:538-556.

Machlup, F. (1958), An Economic Review of the Patent System, Study No. 15 of the Senate Subcommittee on Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

Machlup, F., Penrose, E. (1950), "The Patent Controversy in the Nineteenth Century". The Journal of Economic History, 10:1-29.

Mansfield, E. (1986a), Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study. Management Science, 32:173-181.

Mazzoleni, R. , Nelson, R.R. (1998), "The Benefits and Costs of Strong Patent Protection: A Contribution to the Current Debate", Research Policy 27: 273-284.

Merges, R.P., Nelson, R.R. (1990), "The Complex Economies of Patent Scope", Columbia Law Review.

Musgrave, R.A. et al. (1985), Die öffentlichen Finanzen in Theorie und Praxis, 3 Bände (Band 1: 6. Aufl., 1994; Band 2: 5. Aufl., 1993; Band 3: 3. Aufl. 1987), Mohr, UTB Nr. 519 und 542.

Nelson, R.R. (1959a), "The Economics of Invention: A Survey", Journal of Business, 32:101-127.

Nelson, R.R. (1959b), "The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research", Journal of Political Economy, 67:297-306.

Ordover, J.A. (1991), "A Patent System for Both Diffusion and Exclusion", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5: 43-60.

Pedrazzini, M.M. (1983), Patent- und Lizenzvertragsrecht. Bern: Verlag Stämpfli & Cie AG.

Phillips, A. (1971), Technology and Market Structure: A Study of the Aircraft Industry. Lexington (Mass.): D.C. Heath.

Reinganum, J.F. (1982), "A Dynamic Game of R&D: Patent Protection and Competitive Behavior", Econometrica, 50:671-88.

Reinganum, J.F. (1989), "The Timing of Innovation: Research, Development and Diffusion", in: Handbook of Industrial Organization, ed. R. Willig and R. Schmalensee. New York: Elsevier Science Publishers.

Scherer, F.M. (1965), "Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity, and the Ouput of Patented Inventions", American Economic Review, 55:1097-1125.

Scherer, F.M. (1967), "Research and Development Resource Allocation Under Rivalry", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 81: 359-394.

Scherer, F.M. (1983), "The Propensity to Patent", International Journal of Industrial Organization", 1:107-128.

Scherer, F.M. (1993), "Research on Patents and the Economy: the State of the Art, in: Results and Methods of Economic Patent Research. Proceedings of the 1st EPO-IFO-Workshop on March 19/20, 1992 at the European Patent Office. European Patent Office, Institute for Economic Research. Munich.

Scherer, F.M. et al. (1959), Patents and the Corporation.Boston: privately published.

Scherer, F.M., Ross, D. (1990), Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance (Third Edition). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Schmalensee, R. (1982), "Product Differentiation Advantages of Pioneering Brands", American Economic Review, 72:349-365.

Scotchmer, S. (1991), "Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5: 29-41.

Shapiro, C. (1983), "Optimal Pricing of Experience Goods", Bell Journal of Economics, 14: 497-507.

Shapiro, C. (1985), "Patent Licensing and R&D Rivalry", American Economic Review Proceedings, 75:25-30.

Shapiro, C., Varian, H.R. (1999), Information Rules. A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Siebeck, W.E. (ed.) (1990), "Strengthening Protection of Intellectual Property in Developing Countries: A Survey of the Literature", World Bank Discussion Papers No. 112.

Siemens, von, W. (1901), Lebenserinnerungen. Berlin (6. Auflage) und München (17. Auflage 1983).

Silberston, Z.A., (1988), "Patents", in: The New Palagrave. A Dictionary of Economics, ed. J. Eatwell et al. Vol.3: 815-816.

Spence, A. M. (1984), "Cost Reduction, Competition, and Industry Performance", Econometrica, 52: 101-21. Stiglitz, J.E., Schonfelder, B. (1989), Finanzwissenschaft (2.Aufl.) München Wien: Oldenburg.

Teece, J. D.(1986), "Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy", Research Policy, 15:285-305.

Tilton, J.E. (1971), International Diffusion of Technology: The case of Semiconductors. Washington: Brookings Institution

Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., Jaffe, A. (1992), "Quantifying Basicness and Appropriability of Innovations with the Aid of Patent Data: A Comparison of University and Corporate Research", Paper presented at the INSEE Seminar on Technological Appropriation, Paris, 9-10 June 1992.