El Efecto de la Mediterraneidad sobre el Flujo Comercial Internacional: Evidencia Empírica Internacional y para América del Sur (1990-2016)

Delgadillo Chavarria, Carlos Bruno (2019): El Efecto de la Mediterraneidad sobre el Flujo Comercial Internacional: Evidencia Empírica Internacional y para América del Sur (1990-2016).

Abstract

El objetivo del presente documento es analizar la relación entre la condición de país sin litoral y el flujo comercial internacional, considerando la importancia de la calidad institucional, la política comercial, la calidad de infraestructura y la calidad logística. Para tal propósito estimamos dos modelos estructurales de gravedad de comercio mediante el método de estimación denominado “Poisson Pseudo Maximun Likelihood”. Uno de nuestros modelos es estimado usando una muestra de datos de panel de más 130 países que son exportadores e importadores durante el periodo 1996-2016. El segundo modelo es estimado usando una muestra de 10 países importadores de América del Sur y más de 130 países exportadores durante el periodo 1996-2016. Los resultados del primer modelo sugieren que los países sin litoral por el lado exportar tienden, en promedio, a tener entre 24.91% y 33.29% menor flujo comercial en comparación a los países costeros. Asimismo, los resultados de este modelo con datos internacionales sugieren que el flujo comercial de los países sin litoral por el lado importador es 24.17% a 32.96% menor en comparación al flujo comercial de los países costeros. Los resultados del segundo modelo sugieren que el nivel de importaciones de los países de América del Sur sin litoral, Bolivia y Paraguay, es 19.93% a 28.11% menor en comparación al resto de países de América del Sur que tienen costa. También, los resultados de este segundo modelo sugieren que las importaciones de los países de América del Sur son 25.54% y 36.14% menores cuando los países que exportan no tienen litoral en comparación a los países exportadores que tienen costa. Por último, en ambos modelos hemos encontrado que los efectos de la condición de país sin litoral tanto por el lado exportador como por el lado importador disminuyen cuando se consideran la calidad institucional, la política comercial, la calidad de infraestructura y la calidad logística.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: The Effect of Landlocked Country Status on International Trade Flow: International and South America Empirical Evidence (1990-2016)
• Language: Spanish
• Keywords: Mediterraneidad, Comercio Internacional, Modelo Estructural de Gravedad de Comercio, Poisson Pseudo Maximun Likelihood
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C23 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F19 - Other; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development

References

Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, & J. A. Robinson. (2001). The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation, American Economic Review 91,(13), 69-1401.

Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, & J. A. Robinson. (2002). Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution, Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, 1231-1294.

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2008). The Role of Institutions in Growth and Development. Washington, DC: Working Paper N0. 10, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank On behalf of the Commission on Growth and Development.

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2012). Los origenes del poder la prosperidad y la pobreza: Por qué fracasan los países. Editorial Planeta Colombia S.A.

Agnosteva, D., Anderson, J. E. & Yotov, Y. V. (2014), ‘Intra-National Trade Costs: Measures and Aggregation’, Cambridge, MA, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper No. 19872.

Agramont, D., & Peres, J. (2016). Bolivia: Un País Privado de Litoral. Apuntes para un Debate Pendiente. La Paz: OXFAM/PLURAL EDITORES.

Anderson, J. E. (2011) The Gravity Model. Annual Review of Economics 3, 133-160.

Anderson, J. E. and van Wincoop, E. (2003) Gravity With Gravitas: a Solution to the Border Puzzle.American Economic Review 93[1], 170-192.

Anderson, J. E. and van Wincoop, E. (2004) Trade Costs. Journal of Economic Literature 42[3], 691-751.

Angrist, J., & Pischke, J.-S. (2008). Dominar la Econometría: El Camino entre el Efecto y la Causa. Barcelona: Antoni Bosch.

Ardiles, F., & Yutronic, K. (2018). El efecto de la mediterraneidad en el desarrollo economico de Bolivia: Una aproximación empírica. Revista de Análisis del Banco Central de Bolivia, 28, 9-156.

Ariekot, C. (2016). Trade Facilitation and Landlocked Countries: Does Trade Facilitation have an Effect on Landlocked Countries? Lund University.

Armington, P. S. (1969), ‘A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production’, IMF Staff Papers 16(1): 159-176.

Arvis, J.F., Raballand G., & Marteau, J.F. (2007), The cost of being landlocked: logistics costs and supply chain reliability. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4258.

Baier, S. L. & Bergstrand, J. H. (2002), ‘On the Endogeneity of International Trade Flows and Free Trade Agreements’, unpublished, retrieved from "http://www3.nd.edu/~jbergstr/Working_%20Papers/EndogeneityAug2002.pdf"

Baier, S. L. and Bergstrand, J. H. (2009) Estimating the Effects of Free Trade Agreements on International Trade Flows Using Matching Econometrics. Journal of International Economics 77[1], 63-76.

Baldwin, R. & Taglioni, D. (2006), ‘Gravity for Dummies and Dummies for Gravity Equations’, Cambridge, MA, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper No. 12516.

Banco Mundial - Organización de Naciones Unidas (2014). Improving Trade and Transport for Landlocked Developing Countries: A ten Years of Review. Washington: Banco Mundial.

Basnet, S. (2017). Institutions and Economic Growth of Landlocked Nations: Working Paper CEsA CSG 156 / 2017. University of Lisbon.

Borchert, I., Gootiiz, B., Grover, A., & Mattoo, A. (2011). Landlocked or Policy Locked: How Services Trade Protection Deepens Economic Isolation? Washington: The World Bank.

Burgoa, R. (2011). Landlockedness Economic Impact Upon Bolivian Exports. MPRA Paper No. 59904, Munich Personal RePEc Archive.

Burgoa, R. (2017). Efecto de la demanda maritima en La Haya sobre el flujo comercial bilateral entre Bolivia-Chile. Latin American Journal of Economic Development(28), 7-41.

Burgoa, R. (2019). La mediterraneidad como determinante de flujo comercial bilateral. Latin American Journal of Economic Development(30), 7-25.

Burgoa, R., & Vidaurre, L. (2019). La mediterraneidad como determinante del flujo bilateral de inversión extranjera directa. La Paz, Bolivia: Documento de Trabajo IISEC-UCB No.03/19. Instituto de Investigaciones Socioeconomicas de la Universidad Catolica Boliviana San Pblo.

Caceres, J. (2018). Modelo de negociación bilateral - Análisis del diferendo maritimo entre Bolivia y Chile desde la óptica de la teoría de Juegos. Cochabamba, Bolivia: Onceavo Encuentro de Economistas de Bolivia organizado por el Banco Central de Bolivia y la Universidad Mayor de San Simón.

Carmignani, F. (2012). The curse of being landlocked: institutions rather than trade . Nathan: Griffith University .

Carrère, C., & Grigoriou, C. (2008). Landlockedness, Infraestructure and Trade: New Estimates for Central Asian Countries. Francia: Centre d'études et de Recherches en Développement International.

Cheng, I.-H. & Wall, H. J. (2005) Controlling for Heterogeneity in Gravity Models of Trade and Integration. Federal Reserve Bank of St.Louis Review 87[1], 49-63.

Collier, P., (2007). The Bottom of Billion: Why the Poorest Countries are Failing and What can be done about It. Oxford University Press, 2007.

Correia, S., Guimarães, P., Zylkin, T.: "ppmlhdfe: Fast Poisson Estimation with High-Dimensional Fixed Effects", 2019; arXiv:1903.01690.

Dutt, P., & Traca, D. (2010). Corruption ad Bilateral Trade Flows: Extortion or Evasion. The Review of Economics and Statistics, IV(92), 843-860.

Eaton, J. and Kortum, S. (2002) Technology, Geography and Trade. Econometrica 70 [5], 1741-1779.

Faye M.L., McArthur J.W., Sachs J.D. & Snow T., 2004, The Challenges Facing Landlocked Developing Countries, Journal of Human Development, Vol. 5, No. 1, March 2004: 31-68.

Christ, N., & Ferrantino, M., (2011). Land transport for export: The effects of cost, time and uncertainty in sub-Saharan Africa, World Development.

Egger, P. & Nigai, S. (2015) Structural Gravity With Dummies Only: Constrained ANOVA-Type Estimation of Gravity Models. Journal of International Economics 97[1], 86-99.

Friberg, R., & Tinn, K. (2009). Landlocked countries and holdup. Stockholm School of Economics.

Gallup, J., Sachs, J., & Mellinger, A. (1999). Geography and Economic Development. Massachusetts: Working Paper No.1. Center for International Development at Harvard University.

Grigoriou, C., (2007) “Landlockedness, Infrastructure and Trade: New Estimates for Central Asian Countries.” Policy Research Working Paper, World Bank, 4335.

Head, K. & Mayer, T., (2002), “Illusory Border Effects: Distance Mismeasurement Inflates Estimates of Home Bias in Trade”, CEPII Working Paper 2002-01.

Head, K., Mayer, T. & Ries, J. (2010), The erosion of colonial trade linkages after independence Journal of International Economics, 81(1):1-14.

Head, K. & Mayer, T. (2014), ‘Gravity Equations: Workhorse, Toolkit, and Cookbook.’, in Gopinath, G., Helpman, E., and Rogoff, K. (eds) , Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 4, Oxford: Elsevier B. V.

Heid, B., Larch, M. & Yotov, Y. V. (2015), ‘A Simple Method to Estimate the Effects of NonDiscriminatory Trade Policy Within Structural Gravity Models’, unpublished, retrivied from HYPERLINK "http://www.etsg.org/ETSG2015/Papers/439.pdf" http://www.etsg.org/ETSG2015/Papers/439.pdf

Herbas, B., Garay, G., & Quiroga, M. (2018). La influencia de la mediterraneidad boliviana en los sesgos cognitivos de inversión y las actitudes de la pobreza. Revista de Análisis del Banco Central de Bolivia, 28, 201-230.

Hidalgo, C., & Hausmann, R., (2009). “The Building Blocks of Economic Complexity.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (26): 10570–75 doi:10.1073/pnas.0900943106.

Jetter, M., Mösle, S., & Stadelmann, D. (2017). Landlockedness and Economic Development: Analyzing Subnational Panel Data and Exploring Mechanisms: CESIFO Working Paper 6733. Munich: Munich Society for the Promotion of Economic Research ‐ CESifo.

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. & Mastruzzi, M., (2003), Governance Matters III: Governance Indicators for 1996-2002. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3106. Available at SSRN: HYPERLINK "https://ssrn.com/abstract=405841" \t "_blank" https://ssrn.com/abstract=405841

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. & Mastruzzi, M., (2006), Governance Matters V: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators for 1996-2005. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4012. Available at SSRN: HYPERLINK "https://ssrn.com/abstract=930847" \t "_blank" https://ssrn.com/abstract=930847

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. & Mastruzzi, M., (2009), Governance Matters VIII: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators, 1996-2008. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4978. Available at SSRN: HYPERLINK "https://ssrn.com/abstract=1424591" \t "_blank" https://ssrn.com/abstract=1424591

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. & Zoido, P., (1999) Governance Matters. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2196. Available at SSRN: HYPERLINK "https://ssrn.com/abstract=188568" \t "_blank" https://ssrn.com/abstract=188568

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. & Zoido, P., (2002), Governance Matters II: Updated Indicators for 2000-01. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2772. Available at SSRN: HYPERLINK "https://ssrn.com/abstract=297497" \t "_blank" https://ssrn.com/abstract=297497

Krugman, P. (1979). Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competitions, and International Trade. Journal of International Economics (9), 469-479.

Krugman, P. (1980). Scale Economies, Product Differentiation and The Patern of Trade. The American Economic Review, LXX(5), 950-959.

Lahiri, B., & Masjidi, F. (2012). Landlocked Countries: A Way to Integrate with Coastal Economies. Journal of Economic Integration, XXVII(4), 505-519.

Limao, N. & Venables, A.J., (2001). “Infrastructure,Geographical Disadvantage and Transport Costs”, World Bank Economic Review, 15: 451-479.

MacKellar, L, Worgotter, A & Worz, J. (2000): Economic development problems of landlocked countries. IHS working paper no. 14 Institut fur Hohere Studien: Vienna.

Magee, C. (2009). “New measures of trade creation and trade diversion”. Journal of International Economics, 75 (2).

Mayer, T. & Zignago, S. (2011) Notes on CEPII’s distances measures: the GeoDist Database. CEPII Working Paper 2011-25.

Mélitz, J. (2002), “Language and Foreign Trade”, CEPR Discussion Paper 3590.

Melitz, J., & Toubai, F. (2012). Native Language, Spoken Language, Traslation and Trade: CEPII, Working Paper No. 17. Francia: Centre d'Études Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales.

Mendoza, R., Céspedes, A., Ticona, U., Bustos, P., Aguilar, M., Vasquez, S., . . . Pantoja, J. (2018). Restricciones al comercio y al desarrollo economico en paises mediterraneos: Impacto en el crecimiento, la pobreza y el comercio, el caso de Bolivia. Revista de Análisis del Banco Central de Bolivia, 28, 231-301.

North, Douglass C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Olivero, M. P. & Yotov, Y. V. (2012) Dynamic Gravity: Endogenous Country Size and Asset Accumulation. Canadian Journal of Economics 45[1], 64-92.

Palovirta, M. (2018). Helping Landlocked Countries Connect. Astana: Internet Society, European Regional Bureau.

Paudel, R. (2014). Economic Growth in Developing Countries: Is Landlockedness Destiny?: Workin Paper in Trade and Development No. 01. The Australian National University.

Raballand, G. (2003) Determinants of the negative impact of being landlocked on trade: an empirical investigation through the Central Asian Case, Comparative Economic Studies, 45: 520-536.

Raballand, G. & Macchi, P. (2009), “Transport Prices and Costs: The Need to Revisit Donors’ Policies in Transport in Africa”, BREAD Working Paper No. 190, Bureau for Research and Economic Analysis of Development.

Radelet, S., & Sachs, J., (1998), “Shipping costs, Manufactured Exports and Economic Growth”, mimeo Harvard Institute for International Development.

Redding S. & Venables A., 2004. Economic geography and international inequality. Journal of International Economics 62, 53-82.

Rodrik, D., A. Subramanian and F. Trebbi (2002). “Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development”, Working Paper No. 9305, National Bureau of economic Research, Cambridge, Mass., United States

Rodrik, D. (2007). One Economics Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions and Economic Growth. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Sachs, J., (2001) Tropical Underdevelopment. NBER Working Paper No. 8119, February.

Sachs, J. (2003). Institutions don´t Rule: Direct Effects of Geography on Per Capita Income. Massachusetts: Working Paper No. 9490. National Bureau of Economic Research.

Sachs, J. (2006). El fin de la pobreza: Como conseguirlo en nuestros tiempos. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Sudamericana S.A.

Sachs, J., & Warner, A., (1997) “Sources of Slow Growth in African Economics.” Journal of African Economics, Vol. 6,No.3: 335-376.

Santos Silva, J. M. & Tenreyro, S. (2006) The Log of Gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics 88[4], 641-658.

Santos Silva, J. M. C., and S. Tenreyro. 2010. On the Existence of the Maximum Likelihood Estimates in Poisson Regression. Economics Letters 107(2): 310–312.

Santos Silva, J. M. & Tenreyro, S. (2011) Further Simulation Evidence on the Performance of the Poisson Pseudo-Maximum Likelihood Estimator. Economics Letters 112[2], 220-222.

Stone, J., (2001), “Infrastructure development in landlocked and transit developing countries: Foreign aid private investment and the transport cost burden of landlocked developing countries”, UNCTAD/LDC/II2, UNCTAD, Geneva.

Yotov, Y., Piermartini, R., Monteiro, J., & Larch, M. (2016). An Advanced Guide to Trade Policy Analysis: The Structural Gravity Model. United Nations Coference on Trade and Development and The World Trade Organization.