Carbon emissions, and economic growth in Africa

Olusanya, Olubusoye and Musa, Dasauki (2018): Carbon emissions, and economic growth in Africa.

Abstract

ABSTRACT: In this study, we applied the recently proposed income elasticity approach to investigate the presence of an inverted U relationship also known as the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) in 20 African countries. we grouped the countries into three panels not according to any know regions, but according to income such as Low-income African economies, lower- Middle African economies and upper-Middle income African economies. We tested for the presence of an inverted U relationship for both individual-specific countries and for the 3 panels using short-run and long-run income elasticity approach. We conclude the presence of an inverted-U relationship exists when long-run Income elasticity is smaller than short-run income elasticity, meaning that as income increase over time, carbon emissions have reduced. In other words, as these individual African countries experience economic growth over time, their carbon emissions level has declined. This empirical finding is true only for Benin, Malawi, cote div our, south Africa, Botswana, and Libya, representing approximately 30% of the sample. With regards to the panel groups, we found evidence supporting the presence of an inverted U relationship only in the panel of low-income African countries with long-run income elasticity smaller than the short-run income elasticity, thus, the low-income African countries have reduced their carbon emissions level as economic growth is attained.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Keywords: Environmental Kuznets curve, economic growth, Carbon Emissions
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Other Primary Products; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O14 - Industrialization ; Manufacturing and Service Industries ; Choice of Technology; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling

References

References Azomahou, T., Laisney, F., Van, P.N., 2006. Economic development and CO2 emissions: a nonparametric panel approach. Journal of Public Economics 90, 1347–1363.

Beg N, Morlot JC, Davidson O, Afrane-Okesse Y, Tyani L, Denton F, Sokona Y, Thomas JP, La Rovere E, Parikh JK, Parikh K, Rahman(2011). Linkages between Climate Change and Sustainable Development. Clim. Policy 2(2-3):129-144.

Bertinelli, L., Strobl, E., 2005. The environmental Kuznets curve semi-parame- trically revisited. Economics Letters 88, 350–357.

Bewket W (2012). Climate change perceptions and adaptive responses of smallholder farmers in Central Highlands of Ethiopia, Int. J. Environ. Stud. 69(3):507-523.

Breitung, J., 2000. The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In: Baltagi, B. (Ed.), Advances in Econometrics, Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels, 15. JAI Press, Amsterdam, pp. 161–178.

Bruckner M (2012). Climate change vulnerability and the identification of least developed countries (LDCs). The United Nations Development Policy and Analysis Division Department of Economic and Social Affairs. pp. 3-15.

Bruno, M. and W. Easterly (1998), “Inflation Crisis and Long-Run Growth”, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 41

Charfeddine, L., & Mrabet, Z. (2017). The impact of economic development and social-political factors on ecological footprint: A panel data analysis for 15 MENA countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76, 138–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.031

Dijkgraaf, E., & Vollebergh, H.R.J. (1998). Environmental Kuznets revisited – time series versus panel estimation: the CO2 case (OCFEB Research Memorandum No. 9806). Netherlands: OCFEB.

Dijkgraaf, E., & Vollebergh, H.R.J. (2001). A note on testing for environmental Kuznets curves, environmental policy, economic reform and endogenous technology (OCFEB Working Paper Series 7). Netherlands: OCFEB.

Galeotti, M., Lanza, A., Pauli, F., 2006. Reassessing the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a robustness exercise. Ecological Economics 57, 152–163. Hlouskova, J.,Wagner, M., 2006. The performance of panel unit and stationary tests: results from a large scale simulation study. Econometric Reviews 25, 85–116.

Gosh, A. and Phillips, S. (1998), “Warning: Inflation May Be harmful to your Growth”, IMF Staff Papers, 45(4).

Huq S, Reid H, Konate M, Rahman A, Sokona Y, Crick F (2004). Mainstreaming adaptation to climate change in LDCs. Clim. Policy 4(1):25-43.

Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 115, 53–74.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). Climate change 2007: Synthesis Report. Cambridge: Cambridge IPCC (2009). Mitigation of Climate Change: The Working Group III Contribution to the IPCC 4th Assessment Report.

IPCC (2014). Hijioka, Y., E. Lin, J.J. Pereira, R.T. Corlett, X. Cui, G.E. Insarov, R.D. Lasco, E. Lindgren, and A. Surjan (2014). Asia. In:Climate Change. pp. 1327-1370.

IPCC (2014). Jiménez Cisneros, B.E., T. Oki, N.W. Arnell, G. Benito, J.G. Cogley, P. Döll, T. Jiang, and S.S.

Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 49, 1-28.

Narayan and Narayan (2010) Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: Panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy 661–666

Narayan, P. K, & Narayan, S. (2010). Carbon dioxide and economic growth: panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy, 38, 661-666.25(2), 191-198.

Narayan, P.K., et al., Economic growth and carbon emissions, Econ. Model. (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.10.027

Narayan, P.K., Narayan, S., Smyth, R., 2008. Are oil shocks permanent or temporary? Panel data evidence from crude oil and NGL production in 60 countries. Energy Economics 30, 919–936.

Omisakin, A.O. (2009). Economic Growth and Environmental Quality in Nigeria: Does Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis hold? Environmental Research Journal,3(1), 14-18. Pedroni, P., 1999. Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics Special Issue, 653–670.

Perman, R., Stern, D.I., 2003. Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests that the environmental Kuznets curve does not exist. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 47, 325–347.

Stern, D.I., Common, M.S., 2001. Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for sulfur?. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41, 162–178. Stern, D.I., 2004. The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development 32, 1419–1439.

Westerlund, J. 2007. Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 69: 709–748

Ozturk, Ilhan, Acaravci, Ali,2012.The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness, and financialdevelopmentoncarbonemissionsinTurkey.Energy Economics36(c),262–26710.1016/j.eneco.2012.08.025.