Sharma, Ajay (2019): Misleading Advertising in Mixed Markets: Consumer-orientation and welfare outcomes. Forthcoming in: International Journal of Economics of Business
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_96189.pdf Download (610kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this paper, we analyse misleading advertising competition between private firms (profit oriented) and consumer-oriented firms (concerned about consumer welfare) in the context of mixed markets. The nature of advertising in this paper is assumed to be non-rival in nature and is beneficial to all the firms in the market. We find that, both private and consumer-oriented firms incur positive expenditure on misleading advertising. Further, the profit of consumer-oriented firms is higher than that of private firms. Moreover, irrespective of whether firms are concerned about consumer welfare or not, the level of misleading advertising is socially excessive.
| Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
|---|---|
| Original Title: | Misleading Advertising in Mixed Markets: Consumer-orientation and welfare outcomes |
| Language: | English |
| Keywords: | Misleading advertising, Non-rival advertising, Consumer-oriented firm, Mixed markets, Cournot competition |
| Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D21 - Firm Behavior: Theory L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior L - Industrial Organization > L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise |
| Item ID: | 96189 |
| Depositing User: | Dr. Ajay Sharma |
| Date Deposited: | 03 Oct 2019 07:37 |
| Last Modified: | 03 Oct 2019 07:37 |
| References: | Andreasen, A. R. (1994). Social marketing: Its definition and domain. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 108-114. Basu, K. (1995). Stackelberg equilibrium in oligopoly: an explanation based on managerial incentives. Economics Letters, 49(4), 459-464. Bian, J., Li, K. W., & Guo, X. (2016). A strategic analysis of incorporating CSR into managerial incentive design. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 86, 83-93. Crespi, J., & Marette, S. (2002). Generic advertising and product differentiation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(3), 691-701. Dixit, A., & Norman, V. (1978). Advertising and welfare. The Bell Journal of Economics, 1-17. Freimuth, V. S., Hammond, S. L., & Stein, J. A. (1988). Health advertising: prevention for profit. American Journal of Public Health, 78(5), 557-561. Glaeser, E. L., & Ujhelyi, G. (2010). Regulating misinformation. Journal of Public Economics, 94(3), 247-257. Goering, G. E. (2008). Welfare impacts of a non-profit firm in mixed commercial markets. Economic Systems, 32(4), 326-334. Goerke, J. (2003). Taking the quantum leap: Nonprofits are now in business. An Australian perspective. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8(4), 317-327. Hattori, K., & Higashida, K. (2012). Misleading advertising in duopoly. Canadian Journal of Economics, 45, 1154–1187. Kopel, M., & Marini, M. A. (2014). Strategic delegation in consumer cooperatives under mixed oligopoly. Journal of Economics, 113(3), 275-296. Matsumura, T., & Sunada, T. (2013). Advertising competition in a mixed oligopoly. Economics Letters, 119(2), 183-185. Pi, J., Zhang, P., & Chen, X. (2018). An Investigation of Stackelberg Mixed Oligopoly with Advertising Competition. The Manchester School, 86(4), 468-487. Pierce JP, Choi WS, Gilpin EA, Farkas AJ, & Berry CC. Tobacco Industry Promotion of Cigarettes and Adolescent Smoking. The Journal of American Medical Association. 1998;279(7):511-515. Sharma, A. (2018). A note on Stackelberg equilibrium in duopoly: Strategic use of corporate social responsibility. Economics Bulletin, 38(4), 1720-1726. Singh, N., & Vives, X. (1984). Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. The RAND Journal of Economics, 546-554. |
| URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/96189 |

