User Fee Design by Canadian Municipalities: Considerations Arising from Case Law

Tedds, Lindsay M. and Farish, Kelly I.E. (2014): User Fee Design by Canadian Municipalities: Considerations Arising from Case Law. Published in: Canadian Tax Journal , Vol. 62, No. 3 (2014): pp. 635-670.

Abstract

User fees have become increasingly relied upon by municipal governments in Canada to fund municipal services due to the combined pressures from federal and provincial devolution of responsibility and the political costs of raising property taxes. While there is a substantial body of literature regarding the rationale for user fees, little information exists about how to design and implement a user fee such that it satisfies the Canadian legal requirements that have been established for the formal classification of user fees. We provide a detailed review of the existing Canadian case law to highlight key legal, technical, and administrative issues that present design and implementation challenges for user fees for Canadian municipalities. Through this analysis we highlight the key legal tests for user fees and discuss their application in case law. The application and interpretation of these tests in the case law draw attention to several unresolved issues and inconsistencies that need to be navigated and resolved by the courts.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Fees, User Charges, Municipal Finance, Tax Law
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H27 - Other Sources of Revenue; H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H71 - State and Local Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue

References

Federation of Canadian Municipalities, The State of Canada’s Cities and Communities 2012 (Ottawa: Federation of Canadian Municipalities, 2012), at 4. (http://www.fcm.ca/Documents/reports/The_State_of_Canadas_Cities_and_Communities_2012_EN.pdf).

Richard M. Bird, Charging for Public Services: A New Look at an Old Idea (Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation, 1976)

Harry M. Kitchen, Local Government Finance in Canada (Canada: Canadian Tax Foundation, 1984)

Harry M. Kitchen, Municipal Revenue and Expenditure Issues in Canada (Canada: Canadian Tax Foundation, 2002)

Harry Kitchen, “Pricing of Local Government Services” in Paul A. R. Hobson & France St. Hilaire, eds., Urban Governance and Finance: A Question of Who Does What (Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy, 1997)

Richard M. Bird and Thomas Tsiopoulos, “User Charges for Public Services: Potentials and Problems” (1997), 45(1) Canadian Tax Journal 25

Donald N. Dewees, “Pricing Municipal Services: The Economics of User Fees” (2002), 50(2) Canadian Tax Journal 586

David G. Duff, “Benefit Taxes and User Fees in Theory and Practice” (2004) 54 University of Toronto Law Journal 391.

Catherine Althaus, Lindsay M. Tedds, and Allen McAvoy, “The Feasibility of Implementing a Congestion Charge on the Halifax Peninsula: Filling the ‘Missing Link’ of Implementation” (2011) 37(4) Canadian Public Policy 541

Wisconsin, Legislative Audit Bureau, Joint Legislative Audit Committee, Best Practices Report: Local Government User Fees (Madison, WI: Legislative Audit Bureau, 2004) (http://legis.wisconsin.gov/lab/reports/04-0UserFeesFull.pdf)

Leslie A. Powell, “Comment: User Fee or Tax: Does Diplomatic Immunity from Taxation Extend to New York City’s Proposed Congestion Charge?” (2009) 23 Emory International Law Review 231

Hugh D. Spitzer, “Taxes vs Fees: A Curious Confusion” (2003) 38(2) Gonzaga Law Review 335.

Carson’s Camp Ltd v. Amabel (Township (1998), 159 DLR (4th) 180, 47 MPLR (2d) 31 (Ct of Jus, Gen Div).

Allard Contractors Ltd v Coquitlam (District), [1993] 4 SCR 371, 85 BCLR (2d) 257 (SCC).

Antigonish (Town) Waste Disposal Charges Bylaw, Re (1999), 7 MPLR (3d) 165, 181 NSR (2d) 68 (NSSC).

City of Ottawa, Office of the Auditor General, 2010 Audit Report (Ottawa: Office of the Auditor General, 2011) (http://www.ottawa.ca/city_hall/mayor_council/auditor_general/audit_reports/2011/annual_report_2010_en.pdf

Constitution Act, 1867, 30 & 31 Victoria, c. 3 (UK).

Eurig Estate, Re, [1998] 2 SCR 565, 1998 Canlii 801 (SCC).

Felix Hoehn, Municipalities and Canadian Law: Defining the Authority of Local Governments (Saskatoon, SK: Purich Publishing, 1996) at 1.

620 Connaught Ltd v. Canada (Attorney General) 2008 SCC

Paul LeBreux, “Eurig Estate: Another Day, Another Tax” (1999) 47(5) Canadian Tax Journal 1126.

Kingstreet Investments Ltd v. New Brunswick (Department of Finance), 2007 SCC 1

Barbour v University of British Columbia, 2009 BCSC 425.

Ian MacFee Rogers, The Law of Canadian Municipal Corporations (2nd ed.) (Toronto: Carswell, 1971-).

Kyle Slavin, “Saanich waives garbage fee for home that recycles all its waste”, BC Local News, April 25, 2012, (http://www.bclocalnews.com/news/148914485.html).

Benjamin Alarie and Richard M. Bird, Tax Aspects of Canadian Fiscal Federalism at 12 (Social Science Research Network, September 30, 2009) (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1689311)

Hudson’s Bay Co v Ontario (Attorney General) (2000), 49 OR (3d) 455 (Ont Sup Ct Jus

Gerard V. La Forest, The allocation of taxing power under the Canadian Constitution, 2nd ed. (Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation, 1981).