Kurrild-Klitgaard, Peter (2019): Hvad nu, hvis flertallet ikke ønsker vinderen af et demokratisk valg? Published in: Politologisk Årbog , Vol. 2019, (2019): pp. 11-15.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_97296.pdf Download (317kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Social choice analysis has demonstrated that it is possible that the result of a democratic process may not be what a majority of the decision-makers wanted. An election inversion (where there is a discrepancy between what a majority wanted and the result) was clearly visible in the 2016 US presidential election, but it was less visible that even the Republican primary voters may not have wanted Trump.
| Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
|---|---|
| Original Title: | Hvad nu, hvis flertallet ikke ønsker vinderen af et demokratisk valg? |
| English Title: | What if the majority does not want the winner of a democratic election? |
| Language: | Danish |
| Keywords: | Social choice; elections; electoral systems; Donald Trump; US politics; 2016 primary elections |
| Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D71 - Social Choice ; Clubs ; Committees ; Associations D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior |
| Item ID: | 97296 |
| Depositing User: | Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard |
| Date Deposited: | 01 Dec 2019 14:37 |
| Last Modified: | 01 Dec 2019 14:37 |
| References: | Kurrild-Klitgaard, P. (2017). Når taberen vinder: Trump og JFK. Politiken (19 Jan 2017), 2: 5. Kurrild-Klitgaard, P. (2018). Trump, Condorcet and Borda: Voting paradoxes in the 2016 Republican presidential primaries. European Journal of Political Economy 55, 29-35. |
| URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/97296 |

