Using a Local Public Good to Attract Representative Creative Class Members: The Inefficient Equilibrium Case

Batabyal, Amitrajeet and Yoo, Seung Jick (2019): Using a Local Public Good to Attract Representative Creative Class Members: The Inefficient Equilibrium Case.

Abstract

Batabyal and Beladi (2019) have recently analyzed a model of competition between two cities that use a local public good (LPG) to attract members of the creative class. The creative class consists of artists and engineers and they study the behavior of a representative artist and an engineer. In this note, we explore three implications of the use of this “representative artist and engineer” modeling strategy. First, we show that the use of such a strategy can lead one to study an inefficient equilibrium in the aggregate economy. Second, we point out that in this inefficient equilibrium, the beliefs of the representative artist and the engineer are inconsistent. Finally, we contend that if we depart from the “representative artist and engineer” construct and focus instead on the entire creative class population which we model as a continuum, then the inefficient equilibrium mentioned above can be turned into an efficient equilibrium.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Artist, Creative Class, Efficient Equilibrium, Engineer, Inefficient Equilibrium
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium > D50 - General; H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H40 - General; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes

References

Audretsch, D.B., and Belitski, M. 2013. The missing pillar: The creativity theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship, Small Business Economics, 41, 819-836.

Batabyal, A.A., and Beladi, H. 2018. Artists, engineers, and aspects of economic growth in a creative region, Economic Modelling, 71, 214-219.

Batabyal, A.A., and Beladi, H. 2019. On the existence of an equilibrium in models of local public good use by cities to attract the creative class, Unpublished Manuscript, Rochester Institute of Technology.

Batabyal, A.A., Kourtit, K., and Nijkamp, P. 2019. Using local public goods to attract and retain the creative class: A tale of two cities, Regional Science Policy and Practice, 11, 571-581.

Bewley, T.F. 1981. A critique of Tiebout’s theory of local public expenditures, Econometrica, 49, 713-740.

Buettner, T., and Janeba, E. 2016. City competition for the creative class, Journal of Cultural Economics, 40, 413-451.

Florida, R. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class. Basic Books, New York, NY.

Florida, R. 2003. Cities and the creative class, City and Community, 2, 3-19.

Florida, R. 2005. The Flight of the Creative Class. Harper Business, New York, NY.

Florida, R. 2008. Who’s Your City? Basic Books, New York, NY. Florida, R. 2014. The creative class and economic development, Economic Development Quarterly, 28, 196-205.

Florida, R., Adler, P., and Mellander, C. 2017. The city as innovation machine, Regional Studies, 51, 86-96.

Hansen, H.K., and Niedomysl, T. 2009. Migration of the creative class: Evidence from Sweden, Journal of Economic Geography, 9, 191-206.

Krugman, P.R., Obstfeld, M., and Melitz, M.J. 2015. International Economics, 10th edition. Pearson, Boston, MA.

Richardson, K.E. 2009. What lures and retains the international creative-class family? A case study of the family unit found in Vancouver’s biotechnology sector, Comparative Technology Transfer and Society, 7, 323-345.