Rahmati, Mohammad Hossein and Tavakoli, Amirhossein and Vesal, Mohammad (2019): What do one hundred million transactions tell us about demand elasticity of gasoline?
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_97858.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
The price elasticity of gasoline demand is a key parameter in evaluation of various policy options. However, most of the literature uses aggregate data to identify this elasticity. Temporal and spatial aggregation make elasticity estimates unreliable. We employ a unique dataset of all gasoline transactions in Iran during a four-month period around an unexpected exogenous price change to identify price elasticity. After controlling for date and individual fixed effects we estimate a robust significant price elasticity of -0.077. Aggregation of the same data by week, month, and city yields an estimate of -0.3 indicating a significant bias in earlier studies. We also identify a significant withholding behavior by consumers in response to anticipated price changes.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | What do one hundred million transactions tell us about demand elasticity of gasoline? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Gasoline demand elasticity, Transaction-level data, Withholding behavior, Subsidy |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C55 - Large Data Sets: Modeling and Analysis D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D12 - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation > Q31 - Demand and Supply ; Prices |
Item ID: | 97858 |
Depositing User: | Mohammad Vesal |
Date Deposited: | 16 Jun 2020 19:59 |
Last Modified: | 16 Jun 2020 19:59 |
References: | Anderson, Soren T., and James M. Sallee. "Designing policies to make cars greener." Annual Review of Resource Economics 8 (2016): 157-180. Basso, Leonardo J.& Tae Hoon Oum (2007) Automobile Fuel Demand: A Critical Assessment of Empirical Methodologies, Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, 27:4, 449-484. Bento, Antonio M., Lawrence H. Goulder, Mark R. Jacobsen, and Roger H. von Haefen. 2009. "Distributional and Efficiency Impacts of Increased US Gasoline Taxes." American Economic Review, 99 (3): 667-99. Brons, M., Nijkamp, P., Pels, E., & Rietveld, P. (2008). A meta-analysis of the price elasticity of gasoline demand. A SUR approach. Energy Economics, 30(5), 2105-2122. Byrne, D. P., Leslie, G. W., & Ware, R. (2015). How do Consumers Respond to Gasoline Price Cycles? Energy Journal, 36(1). Coady, D., I. Parry, L. Sears, and B. Shang (2016). How large are global energy subsidies? CESifo Working Paper Series 5814, CESifo Group Munich. Coglianese, J., Davis, L. W., Kilian, L., & Stock, J. H. (2017). Anticipation, tax avoidance, and the price elasticity of gasoline demand. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 32(1), 1-15. Dahl, C., & Sterner, T. (1991). Analyzing gasoline demand elasticities: a survey. Energy economics, 13(3), 203-210. Davis, Lucas W., and Lutz Kilian. "Estimating the effect of a gasoline tax on carbon emissions." Journal of Applied Econometrics 26, no. 7 (2011): 1187-1214. Espey, M. (1998). Gasoline demand revisited: an international meta-analysis of elasticities. Energy Economics, 20(3), 273-295. Ghoddusi, Hamed, Rafizadeh, Nima, Rahmati, Mohammad H., Price Elasticity of Gasoline Smuggling: A Semi-Structural Estimation Approach, Energy Economics (2018). Gillingham, Kenneth. "Selection on anticipated driving and the consumer response to changing gasoline prices." Unpublished working paper (2012). Gillingham, Kenneth., Jenn, Alan., Azevedo, Inês M.L., "Heterogeneity in the response to gasoline prices: Evidence from Pennsylvania and implications for the rebound effect," Energy Economics (2015), Elsevier, vol. 52(S1), pages 41-52. Goodwin, Phil, Joyce Dargay, and Mark Hanly. "Elasticities of road traffic and fuel consumption with respect to price and income: a review." Transport reviews 24, no. 3 (2004): 275-292. Graham, Daniel J., and Stephen Glaister. "The demand for automobile fuel: a survey of elasticities." Journal of Transport Economics and policy (2002): 1-25. Hastings, Justine S. "Vertical relationships and competition in retail gasoline markets: Empirical evidence from contract changes in Southern California." American Economic Review94, no. 1 (2004): 317-328. Havranek, T., Irsova, Z., & Janda, K. (2012). Demand for gasoline is more price-inelastic than commonly thought. Energy Economics, 34(1), 201-207. Holland, Stephen P., Jonathan E. Hughes, and Christopher R. Knittel. 2009. "Greenhouse Gas Reductions under Low Carbon Fuel Standards?" American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 1 (1): 106-46. Houde, Jean-François. 2012. "Spatial Differentiation and Vertical Mergers in Retail Markets for Gasoline." American Economic Review, 102 (5): 2147-82. Hughes, Jonathan E., Christopher R. Knittel, and Daniel Sperling. Evidence of a shift in the short-run price elasticity of gasoline demand. No. w12530. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2006. Knittel, Christopher R and Sandler, Ryan, “The Welfare Impact of Indirect Pigouvian Taxation: Evidence from Transportation”, NBER, Working Paper (2013). Levin, L., Lewis, M. S., & Wolak, F. A. (2017). High frequency evidence on the demand for gasoline. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(3), 314-47. Lin, C-Y. Cynthia, and Jieyin Jean Zeng. "The elasticity of demand for gasoline in China." Energy Policy 59 (2013): 189-197. Schmalensee, Richard, and Thomas M. Stoker. "Household gasoline demand in the United States." Econometrica 67, no. 3 (1999): 645-662. Sohaili, K. "The effect of determining gasoline price according to market mechanism on environment pollution (case study of Iran)." Procedia Environmental Sciences 2 (2010): 270-273. Wadud, Z., Noland, R. B., & Graham, D. J. (2010). A semiparametric model of household gasoline demand. Energy Economics, 32(1), 93-101. Yatchew, Adonis, and Joungyeo Angela No. "Household gasoline demand in Canada." Econometrica 69, no. 6 (2001): 1697-1709. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/97858 |