Реформа государственной системы проектной деятельности, 2018-2019 годы

Polterovich, Victor (2020): Реформа государственной системы проектной деятельности, 2018-2019 годы. Forthcoming in: Terra Economicus , Vol. 18, No. 1 (2020)

Abstract

The reform of the project activity state system (PASS) carried out in Russia in 2018-2019 is analyzed on the basis of its comparison with the system of institutions of catching-up development (ICD). The expediency of their implementation in modern conditions is confirmed by the experience of Malaysia and Tatarstan. Relying on the IСD system, Malaysia has been able to achieve rapid economic growth, reduce inequality and make significant strides in diversifying production. Due to a system of indicative planning and consolidation of elites, Tatarstan has become one of the most successful regions in Russia. The PASS built now, like the ICD system, brings the task of forming and selecting large-scale projects outside ministries and creates an institutional framework for indicative planning.

The next task is to define more precisely the order of interaction of project offices, expert councils of different levels, private companies, and to develop a methodology for drawing up forecasts and plans of development indicators. Civil society and trade union representatives should be involved in these activities. Functions of PASS should be expanded, it is necessary to replenish the list of national projects. Large-scale projects should be aimed at borrowing more advanced technologies, creating new value chains and diversifying the Russian economy. The government faces the task of promoting inter-regional and intercompany technology exchange. The "Science" project should be substantially redesigned, and a project on improving the national innovation system should be developed. It should include a system of sectorial research institutes as intermediaries between academic science and the research units of large firms.

Ultimately, a Federal Agency for Development with broad credentials should be created, a system of rolling indicative planning should be formed, and all economic policies should be harmonized with the objectives of the plans.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Reform of the project activity state system, 2018-2019
• Language: Russian
• Keywords: development agency; indicative planning; economic growth; project office; competence center
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L52 - Industrial Policy ; Sectoral Planning Methods; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O21 - Planning Models ; Planning Policy; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O25 - Industrial Policy; P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems > P11 - Planning, Coordination, and Reform; P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P21 - Planning, Coordination, and Reform

References

Brown, D., Jeevakumar, G., Loo C., Taliercio, R. (2017). Primer on Malaysia’s Experience with National Development Planning. World Bank Group (http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/840341527676890030/pdf/WP-BackgroundNoteTheMalaysianExperiencewithNationalDevelopmentPlanningUpdatedOct-PUBLIC.pdf).

Butrin, D. (2019). Five years in ten years // Kommersant, (131), 26 July. (In Russian).

Hakimov, R.S. (2014). Tatarstan: Ideology of Regional Development. Kazan: KCFPP, 220 pp. (http://www.kazanfed.ru/dokladi/fedmono_2015.pdf).

Ilyin, V.A., Mazilov, E.A. et al. (2019). National projects 2019–2024: analysis and key risks of their implementation. Scientific and technological sphere and entrepreneurship. Vologda: FSBI VolSC RAS, 75 p.

Ilyin, V.A., Uskova, T.V. et al. (2019). National projects 2019–2024: analysis and key risks of their implementation. The economic block. Vologda: FSBI VolSC RAS, 93 p.

Ivanov, V. V. (2015). Conceptual bases of national technology initiative. Innovation (1), 8-13.

Lee, C., Chew-Ging, L. (2017). The Evolution of Development Planning in Malaysia // Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 34(3), 436–61.

Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation (2019). Budget forecast of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2036. М., 49 p.

Mechanik, A. (2019). Waiting for a clear strategy from the state. Expert, (49), 38–42.

Naseem, N. A. M., Hamizah, M. S. (2013). Exchange rate misalignment and economic growth: some recent evidence from Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 21(S), 47–66.

OECD (2019). OECD Economic Surveys: Malaysia 2019. OECD Publishing, Paris (https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/oecd-economic-surveys-malaysia-2019_eaaa4190-en#page3).

Ogorodnikov, E. (2019). The logic of investing. Expert, (38), September 15–22, 28–31.

Polterovich, V. M. (ed.) (2010). Strategy of modernization of the Russian economy. St. Petersburg: Aletheya. 424 p.

Polterovich, V.M. (2014). Reform of the Russian Academy of Sciences: the Expert Analysis. Article 1. Reform of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Project of the Ministry of Education and Science.  Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost, (1), 5-28.

Polterovich, V.M. (2015). On the formation of a national planning system in Russia. Journal of the New Economic Association (2), 237–242.

Polterovich, V.M. (2016). Institutions of Catching-up Development (On the Project of a New Model for Economic Development of Russia). Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast, (5), 34-56.

Polterovich, V.M. (2018). Federal Development Agency: it is necessary for the design and implementation of successful strategies. Problemy teorii I praktiki upravleniya (3), 35-41

Polterovich, V.M., Panchuk, D.A. (2019). Diversification of Russian economy by deepening hydrocarbon processing: a problem of indicative planning. Energy Policy, (1), 54-63.

Ravallion, M. (2019). Ethnic Inequality and Poverty in Malaysia Since 1969. NBER Working paper series. Working paper 25640 (http://pseweb.eu/ydepot/seance/513189_Ethnic%20inequality%20and%20poverty%20in%20Malaysia%20since%201969%20w25640.pdf).

Rodrik, D. (2007). One economics, many recipes: globalization, institutions, and economic growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 263 p.

Sergeev, S.A., Salagaev, A.L. (2013). Regional Elites of the Republic of Tatarstan: Structure and Evolution. Politiya, (2), 74-85.

Shabunova, A.A., Ilyin, V.A. et al. (2019). National projects 2019–2024: analysis and key risks of their implementation. Social sphere. Vologda: FSBI VolSC RAS, 68 p.

Stiglitz, J. (2007). The Malaysian miracle // The Guardian, September 13 (https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2007/sep/13/themalaysianmiracle).

Tham, S. Y. (2015). Diversification and Industrial Policies in Malaysia, pp. 320–345 / In: Felipe, J. (Ed.) Development and Modern Industrial Policy in Practice: Issues and Country Experiences. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Yakovlev, A., Freinkman, L., Makarov, S., Pogodaev, S. (2018). The Elite Consensus and Regional Economic Development: The Experience of the Republic of Tatarstan. Economic policy, 13(1), 180–217.

Yusof, Z. (2013). Economic Diversification: The Case of Malaysia. Revenue Watch Institute (https://resourcegovernance.org/sites/default/files/RWI_Econ_Diversification_Malaysia.pdf).