Agrarian reform and democracy: Lessons from the Philippine experience

Lanzona, Leonardo (2019): Agrarian reform and democracy: Lessons from the Philippine experience. Published in: Millennial Asia , Vol. 10, No. 3 (8 November 2019): pp. 272-298.

Abstract

Throughout the country’s history, agrarian reform in the Philippines has long been a combative issue and one that is often preceded by some form of instability and violence. Used mainly as a tool to garner grassroots support, agrarian reforms were formally institutionalized by setting up regulations on land size and contracts. Despite efforts to integrate the reforms to the markets, including the clustering of small hectares (ha) of land into large corporate estates, the benefits of the Agrarian Reform Program remained elusive under conservative demarcations set by regulations, including the definition of property rights, transformation or maintenance of state structures and the contract limitations to be formed at the production level. Land continues to be redistributed favorably to former landowner elites. This study finds that inequality in land ownership persists as the institutions set de facto political power to the elites. Under this condition, the equitable redistribution of land is an impossibility.

The Philippine Agrarian Reform Programs have been hampered by high transaction costs and inadequate credible commitments, thus resulting in the erosion of market forces and elite capture of institutions. Based on agency theory, the existing regulation-based program, which relies on the state’s power to expropriate, should give away to a more demand-driven, community-led Agrarian Reform Program that gives the parties more space to negotiate and bargain about the final allocation of the land. This involves the promulgation of relational contracts and the creation of more democratic institutions

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Market-led agrarian reform, democracy, transaction costs, agency theory, Philippines
• Subjects: N - Economic History > N0 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q15 - Land Ownership and Tenure ; Land Reform ; Land Use ; Irrigation ; Agriculture and Environment

References

Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. A. (2006). Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Adamopolous, T., Restuccia, D. (2019). Land reform and productivity: A quantitative analysis with microdata. NBER Working Paper No. 25780. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.

Albertus, M. (2015). Explaining patterns of redistribution under autocracy: The case of Peru’s revolution from above. Latin American Research Review, 50(2), 107–134.

Albertus, M., Diaz-Cayeros, A., Magaloni, B., Weingast, B. (2016). Authoritarian survival and poverty traps: Land reform in Mexico. World Development, 77(1), 154–170.

Alchian, A. A., Demsetz, H. (1973). The property right paradigm. The Journal of Economic History, 33(01), 16–27.

Anderson, B. (1988). Cacique democracy in the Philippines: Origins and dreams. New Left Review, 169, 3–33.

Asian Development Bank (ADB) (2009). Poverty in the Philippines: Causes, constraints, and opportunities. Mandaluyong, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.

Assiotis, A., Sylwester, K. (2014). Do the effects of corruption upon growth differ between democracies and autocracies? Review of Development Economics, 18(3), 581–594.

Baker, G., Gibbons, R., Murphy, K. J. (2002). Relational contracts and the theory of the firm. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 39–84.

Balisacan, A. (1993). Agricultural growth, landlessness, off-farm employment, and rural poverty in the Philippines. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 41(3), 533–562.

Balisacan, A., Edillon, R., Briones, R., Abad-Santos, C. O., Piza, S. (2007). Study on the impact of CARP on poverty reduction and prospects for long-term growth. Quezon City, Philippines: Department of Agrarian Reform.

Ballesteros, M., Bresciani, F. (2008). Land rental market activity in Agrarian reform areas: Evidence from the Philippines. PIDS Discussion Paper Series, No. 2008-26, Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), Makati City, Philippines.

Banerjee, A. V. (2000). Prospects and strategies for land reform. In Pleskovic, B., Stiglitz, J. (Eds.), Annual bank conference on development economics (pp. 253–284). Washington, DC: World Bank.

Berry, R. A., Cline, W. R. (1979). Agrarian structure and productivity in developing countries: A study prepared for the international labour office within the framework of the world employment programme. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Besley, T., Burgess, R.. (2000). Land reform, poverty reduction, and growth: Evidence from India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(2), 389–430.

Borras, S. M., Carranza, D., Franco, J. C. (2007). Anti-poverty or anti-poor? The world bank’s market-led agrarian reform experiment in the Philippines. ThirdWorld Quarterly, 28(8), 1557–1576.

Carter, M. (1984). Identification of the inverse relationship between farm size and productivity: An empirical analysis of peasant agricultural production. Oxford Economic Papers, 36(1), 131–145.

Carter, R., Hodgson, G. M. (2006). The impact of empirical tests of transaction cost economics on the debate on the nature of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 27(5), 461–476.

Coase, R. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3(1), 1–44.

Cornia, G. (1985). Farm size, land yields, and the agricultural production function: An analysis for fifteen developing countries. World Development, 13(4), 513–534.

Deininger, K., Binswanger, H. (2001). The evolution of the world bank’s land policy. In de Janvry, A., Platteau, J.-P., Gordillo, G., Sadoulet, E. (Eds.), Access to land, rural poverty, and public action (pp. 406–440). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Deininger, K., Squire, L. (1998). New ways of looking at old issues, inequality, and growth. Journal of Development Economics, 57(2), 259–287.

De la Croix, D., Delavallade, C. (2011). Democracy, rule of law, corruption incentives, and growth. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 13(2), 155–187.

Demsetz, H. (1969). Information and efficiency: Another viewpoint. The Journal of Law and Economics, 12(1), 1–22.

Huffman, W., Just, R. (2004). Implications of agency theory for optimal land tenure contracts. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 52(3), 617–642.

Hutchcroft, P. D., Rocamora, J. (2003). Strong demands and weak institutions: The origins and evolution of the democratic deficit in the Philippines. Journal of East Asian Studies, 3(2), 259–292.

Goño, C. C. (2019). Agribusiness contracts after property rights reforms. Manila, Philippines: National Historical Commission of the Philippines.

Greif, A. (2005). Commitment, coercion markets: The nature and dynamics of institutions supporting exchange. In Menard, C., Shirley, M. (Eds.), Handbook of new institutional economics (pp. 727–786). New York, NY: Springer.

Gregorio, S. P. (2019). Robust property rights institutions as indispensable prerequisites to successful land reform: The case of East Asia Vis-à-vis the Philippines. Manila, Philippines: National Historical Commission of the Philippines.

Grossman, D., Hart, O.. (1986). The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration.. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 691–719.

Hayami, Y., Quisumbing Ma., A., Adriano, L. (1990). Toward an alternative land reform paradigm: A Philippine perspective. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.

Kvaløy, O. (2007). Asset specificity and vertical integration. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 109(3), 551–572.

Limbo, R. (2019). venture arrangements (AVAs) in agrarian reform areas in the Philippines: Identifying alternative schemes (Policy Papers No. 2019-10-24). Taipeh, Taiwan: Food and Fertilizer Technology Center.

Lynch, O. J. (2011). Colonial legacies in a fragile Republic: Philippine land law and state formation with emphasis on the early U.S. regime (1898–1913). Quezon City: University of the Philippine College of Law.

Marin, G. R. R., Ramos, M. A. M., Yacub Fr., C. A. (2019). Agrarian reform under a democracy (CARL to CARPER). Manila, Philippines: National Historical Commission of the Philippines.

Mendoza, M. P. (2019). Land reform in a modernizing, authoritarian regime. Manila, Philippines: National Historical Commission of the Philippines.

North, D., Wallis, J. J., Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and social orders: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Otsuka, K., Chuma, H., Hayami, Y. (1992). Land and labor contracts in agricultural economics: Theories and facts. Journal of Economic Literature, 30(4), 1965–2018.

Philippine Center for Economic Development (PCED) (2016). Does owning land through agrarian reform or residing in an ARC barangay matter to welfare? An impact assessment of the non-monetary and monetary welfare effects of Agrarian Reform, 1990 to 2010. Quezon City, Philippines: Department of Agrarian Reform.

Poblador, K. F. K. (2019). Colonial origins of landlord-tenant relations. Manila, Philippines: National Historical Commission of the Philippines.

Putzel, J. (1992). Captive land: Politics of agrarian reform in the Philippines. London, UK: CIIR.

Quizon, A. (2019). From aquino to aquino: A program assessment of agrarian reform implementation 1988–2015. Manila, Philippines: National Historical Commission of the Philippines.

Reyes, C. (2002). Impact of agrarian reform on poverty. PIDS Discussion Paper Series, No. 2002-02, Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), Makati City.

Rigobon, R., Rodrik, D. (2005). Rule of law, democracy, openness, and income: Estimating the interrelationships. Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, 13(3), 533–564.

Vollrath, D., Erickson, L. (2007). Land distribution and financial system development. IMF Working Paper WP/07/83. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.

Williamson, O. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York, NY: Free Press.

Williamson, O. (2000). The new institutional economics: Take stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613.