Land Use Restrictions, Misallocation in Agriculture, and Aggregate Productivity in Vietnam

Le, Kien (2018): Land Use Restrictions, Misallocation in Agriculture, and Aggregate Productivity in Vietnam.

Abstract

This paper evaluates the effects of restricted land use rights on aggregate productivity using micro-level data within a quantitative model. In particular, I exploit the Rice Land Designation Policy in Vietnam, which forces farmers to produce rice on almost 45% of land plots. I use digitized versions of Vietnam’s Local Land Use Atlas and Global Agro-Ecological Zones database to construct a micro-spatial dataset that shapes the model features and allows me to compare the restricted against a counterfactual efficient allocation. The main findings suggest that eliminating all land use restrictions leads to an 8.03% increase in real GDP per capita. While misallocation in agriculture has been studied extensively, the paper highlights a novel source of misallocation also prevalent in other countries such as China, Myanmar, and Uzbekistan.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Agriculture, misallocation, land use restrictions, aggregate productivity, Vietnam
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Other Primary Products; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity

References

[1] Adamopoulos, T., Brandt, L., Leight, J., & Restuccia, D. (2017). Misallocation, selection and productivity: A quantitative analysis with panel data from China (No. w23039). National Bureau of Economic Research.

[2] Adamopoulos, T., & Restuccia, D. (2014a). Land reform and productivity: A quantitative analysis with micro data. Unpublished manuscript, University of Toronto, December, 1667-97.

[3] Adamopoulos, T., & Restuccia, D. (2014b). The size distribution of farms and international productivity differences. American Economic Review, 104(6), 1667-97.

[4] Adamopoulos, T., & Restuccia, D. (2018). Geography and agricultural productivity: Cross-country evidence from micro plot-level data (No. w24532). National Bureau of Economic Research.

[5] Buera, F. J., Kaboski, J. P., & Shin, Y. (2014). Macro-perspective on asset grants programs: Occupational and wealth mobility. American Economic Review, 104(5), 159-64.

[6] Chen, C. (2017). Untitled land, occupational choice, and agricultural productivity. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 9(4), 91-121.

[7] Chen, C., Restuccia, D., & Santaeullia-Llopis, R. (2017). The Effects of Land Markets on Resource Allocation and Agricultural Productivity (No. w24034). National Bureau of Economic Research.

[8] Costinot, A., & Donaldson, D. (2016). How large are the gains from economic integration? theory and evidence from us agriculture, 1880-1997 (No. w22946). National Bureau of Economic Research.

[9] Costinot, A., Donaldson, D., & Smith, C. (2016). Evolving comparative advantage and the impact of climate change in agricultural markets: Evidence from 1.7 million fields around the world. Journal of Political Economy, 124(1), 205-248.

[10] Do, Q. T., & Iyer, L. (2008). Land titling and rural transition in Vietnam. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 56(3), 531-579.

[11] Gao, L., Sun, D., & Huang, J. (2017). Impact of land tenure policy on agricultural investments in China: Evidence from a panel data study. China Economic Review, 45, 244-252.

[12] Garcia-Santana, M., & Pijoan-Mas, J. (2014). The reservation laws in India and the misallocation of production factors. Journal of Monetary Economics, 66, 193-209.

[13] Gottlieb, C., & Grobovsek, J. (2019). Communal land and agricultural productivity. Journal of Development Economics, 138, 135-152.

[14] Giesecke, J. A., Tran, N. H., Corong, E. L., & Jaffee, S. (2013). Rice land designation policy in Vietnam and the implications of policy reform for food security and economic welfare. Journal of Development Studies, 49(9), 1202-1218.

[15] Gollin, D., Parente, S., & Rogerson, R. (2002). The role of agriculture in development. American Economic Review, 92(2), 160-164.

[16] Gollin, D., Parente, S. L., & Rogerson, R. (2007). The food problem and the evolution of international income levels. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(4), 1230-1255.

[17] Gollin, D., Lagakos, D., & Waugh, M. E. (2014). Agricultural productivity differences across countries. American Economic Review, 104(5), 165-70.

[18] Haley, S. L. (1991). Capital accumulation and the growth of aggregate agricultural production. Agricultural Economics, 6(2), 129-157.

[19] Hsieh, C. T., & Klenow, P. J. (2009). Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4), 1403-1448.

[20] Kurosaki, T. (2008). Crop choice, farm income, and political control in Myanmar. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 13(2), 180-203.

[21] Lagakos, D., & Waugh, M. E. (2013). Selection, agriculture, and cross-country productivity differences. American Economic Review, 103(2), 948-80.

[22] Law on Land (2003). Law on Land No. 13-2003-QH11 dated 25 December 2001.

[23] Menon, N., Rodgers, Y., & Kennedy, A. R. (2017). Land Reform and Welfare in Vietnam: Why Gender of the LandRights Holder Matters. Journal of International Development, 29(4), 454-472.

[24] Markussen, T., Tarp, F., & Van den Broeck, K. (2011). The forgotten property rights: Evidence on land use rights in Vietnam. World Development, 39(5), 839-850.

[25] Nielsen, C. P. (2003). Vietnam’s rice policy: Recent reforms and future opportunities. Asian Economic Journal, 17(1), 1-26.

[26] International Labour Organization (2015). Monitoring report on the use of child labour and forced labour during the Uzbekistan 2015 Cotton Harvest. Available at: www.ilo.org/ipec/Informationresources/WCMS 427620/lang–en/index.htm.

[27] Restuccia, D., & Rogerson, R. (2008). Policy distortions and aggregate productivity with heterogeneous establishments. Review of Economic Dynamics, 11(4), 707-720.

[28] Restuccia, D., & Santaeulalia-Llopis, R. (2017). Land misallocation and productivity (No. w23128). National Bureau of Economic Research.

[29] Restuccia, D., Yang, D. T., & Zhu, X. (2008). Agriculture and aggregate productivity: A quantitative cross-country analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics, 55(2), 234-250.

[30] Resolution 17/2011/QH13 (2011). On the land use mater plan up to 2020 and national five-year (2011- 2015) land use plan. Available in Vietnamese and English at: www.mpi.gov.vn/Pages/tinbai.aspx?idTin=20565. www.vietnam-redd.org/Upload/CMS/Content/Library-GovernmentDocuments/17 2011 QH13.pdf

[31] Resolution 26/NQ-TW (2008). On agriculture, farmers and rural areas. Available in Vietnamese at: www.moj.gov.vn/vbpq/lists/vn%20bn%20php%20lut/view detail.aspx?itemid=24601.

[32] Resolution 29/2004/QH11 (2004). On the land use plan up to 2010 and land use plan up to 2005. Available in Vietnamese at: www.moj.gov.vn/vbpq/lists/vn%20bn%20php%20lut/view detail.aspx?itemid=19412

[33] Sotelo, S. (2015). Domestic trade frictions and agriculture. In University of Michigan Research Seminar in International Economics Discussion Paper (Vol. 641).

[34] World Bank. Vietnam: advancing rural development - from vision to action. Washington, DC: World Bank, 1998.

[35] World Bank Group. 2016. Transforming Vietnamese Agriculture : Gaining More for Less. Vietnam Development Report;. World Bank, Washington, DC. World Bank.