Adopting the Euro: a synthetic control approach

Gabriel, Ricardo Duque and Pessoa, Ana Sofia (2020): Adopting the Euro: a synthetic control approach.

Abstract

We investigate whether joining the European Monetary Union and losing the ability to set monetary policy affected the economic growth of 12 Eurozone countries. We use the synthetic control approach to create a counterfactual scenario for how each Eurozone country would have evolved without adopting the Euro. We let this matching algorithm determine which combination of other developed economies best resembles the pre-Euro path of twelve Eurozone economies. Our estimates suggest that there were some mild losers (France, Germany, Italy, and Portugal) and a clear winner (Ireland). Nevertheless, a GDP decomposition analysis suggests that the drivers of the economic gains and losses are heterogeneous.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Monetary union, Eurozone, Macroeconomic performance, Synthetic control method, GDP decomposition
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C32 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes ; State Space Models; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General > E02 - Institutions and the Macroeconomy; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E30 - General; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E60 - General; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E65 - Studies of Particular Policy Episodes

References

Abadie, A. (2019). Using synthetic controls: Feasibility, data requirements, and methodological aspects. Journal of Economic Literature. Abadie, A., & Cattaneo, M. D. (2018). Econometric methods for program evaluation. Annual Review of Economics, 10, 465{503. Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2010). Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of california's tobacco control program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105 (490), 493{505. Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2015). Comparative politics and the synthetic control method. American Journal of Political Science, 59 (2), 495{510. Abadie, A., & Gardeazabal, J. (2003). The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the basque country. American Economic Review, 93 (1), 113{132. Alesina, A., & Barro, R. J. (2002). Currency unions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117 (2), 409{436. Alesina, A., Barro, R. J., & Tenreyro, S. (2002). Optimal currency areas. NBER macroeconomics annual, 17 , 301{345. Athey, S., & Imbens, G. W. (2017). The state of applied econometrics: Causality and policy evaluation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31 (2), 3{32. Baldwin, R. E., Di Nino, V., Fontagne, L., De Santis, R. A., & Taglioni, D. (2008). Study on the impact of the euro on trade and foreign direct investment. Barr, D., Breedon, F., & Miles, D. (2003). Life on the outside: economic conditions and prospects outside euroland. Economic Policy, 18 (37), 573{613. Barro, R., & Tenreyro, S. (2007). Economic effects of currency unions. Economic Inquiry, 45 (1), 1{23. Beetsma, R., & Giuliodori, M. (2010). The macroeconomic costs and bene�ts of the emu and other monetary unions: an overview of recent research. Journal of Economic Literature, 48 (3), 603{41. Born, B., Muller, G. J., Schularick, M., & Sedlacek, P. (2019). Stable genius? the macroeconomic impact of trump. Born, B., Muller, G. J., Schularick, M., & Sedlacek, P. (2020). The costs of economic nationalism: evidence from the brexit experiment. The Economic Journal. Botosaru, I., & Ferman, B. (2019). On the role of covariates in the synthetic control method. The Econometrics Journal, 22 (2), 117{130. Breinlich, H., Leromain, E., Novy, D., & Sampson, T. (2020). Voting with their money: Brexit and outward investment by uk �firms. European Economic Review, 103400. Campos, N. F., Coricelli, F., & Moretti, L. (2018). Institutional integration and economic growth in europe. Journal of Monetary Economics. De Grauwe, P. (2020). Economics of the monetary union. Oxford University Press, USA. De Sousa, J., & Lochard, J. (2011). Does the single currency a�ect foreign direct investment? The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 113 (3), 553{578. Eichengreen, B., & Frieden, J. (1993). The political economy of european monetary uni�cation: An analytical introduction. Economics & Politics, 5 (2), 85{104. Feenstra, R. C., Inklaar, R., & Timmer, M. P. (2015). The next generation of the penn world table. American Economic Review, 105 (10), 3150{82. Feldstein, M. (1997). The political economy of the european economic and monetary union: Political sources of an economic liability. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11 (4), 23{42. Ferman, B., & Pinto, C. (2019). Synthetic controls with imperfect pre-treatment �t. Ferman, B., Pinto, C., & Possebom, V. (2020). Cherry picking with synthetic controls. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, forthcoming. Fernandez, C., & Garcia-Perea, P. (2015). The impact of the euro on euro area gdp per capita. Working Paper. Firpo, S., & Possebom, V. (2018). Synthetic control method: Inference, sensitivity analysis and con�fidence sets. Journal of Causal Inference, 6 (2). Fligstein, N., Polyakova, A., & Sandholtz, W. (2012). European integration, nationalism and european identity. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50 , 106{122. Frankel, J., & Rose, A. (1998). The endogeneity of the optimum currency area criteria. The Economic Journal, 108 (449), 1009{1025. Frankel, J., & Rose, A. (2002). An estimate of the e�ect of common currencies on trade and income. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117 (2), 437{466. Gasparotti, A., & Kullas, M. (2019). 20 years of the euro: Winners and losers. Working Paper. Glick, R., & Rose, A. K. (2002). Does a currency union affect trade? the time-series evidence. European Economic Review, 46 (6), 1125{1151. Guiso, L., Herrera, H., Morelli, M., & Sonno, T. (2019). Global crises and populism: the role of eurozone institutions. Economic Policy, 34 (97), 95{139. Hope, D. (2016). Estimating the effect of the emu on current account balances: A synthetic control approach. European Journal of Political Economy, 44 , 20{40. Kenen, P. (1969). The theory of optimum currency areas: an eclectic view. Monetary problems of the international economy, 45 (3), 41{60. King, G., & Zeng, L. (2006). The dangers of extreme counterfactuals. Political Analysis, 14 (2), 131{159. Krugman, P. (1998). The euro: Beware of what you wish for. Fortune, December. Lane, P. R. (2006). The real effects of european monetary union. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20 (4), 47{66. McKinnon, R. I. (1963). Optimum currency areas. The American Economic Review, 53 (4), 717{725. Micco, A., Stein, E., & Ordonez, G. (2003). The currency union effect on trade: early evidence from emu. Economic Policy, 18 (37), 315{356. Mundell, R. A. (1961). A theory of optimum currency areas. The American Economic Review, 51 (4), 657{665. Puzzello, L., & Gomis-Porqueras, P. (2018). Winners and losers from the euro. European Economic Review, 108 , 129{152. Rose, A. K. (2000). One money, one market: the effect of common currencies on trade. Economic Policy, 15 (30), 08{45. Schmitz, B., & Von Hagen, J. (2011). Current account imbalances and �financial integration in the euro area. Journal of International Money and Finance, 30 (8), 1676{1695. Verstegen, L., van Groezen, B., & Meijdam, A. (2017). Bene�ts of emu participation: estimates using the synthetic control method. Working Paper. Wyplosz, C. (2006). European monetary union: the dark sides of a major success. Economic Policy, 21 (46), 208{261.