The Role of International Collaborations in Securing the Patent Grant

Drivas, Kyriakos and Kaplanis, Ioannis (2020): The Role of International Collaborations in Securing the Patent Grant.

Abstract

Our study examines whether patent applications with international collaborations are more likely to be awarded a US patent than applications without. It contributes significantly to the growing literature that examines from the innovator’s viewpoint the likelihood of securing the patent grant. The analysis focuses on the full sample (almost half a million) of patent applications over the period 2001-2009 at the USPTO, that disclosed at least one EU located inventor, and furthermore, explicitly distinguishes between countries with high and low number of patent applications. Firstly, we find that applications from teams rather than individual inventors are more successful in obtaining a patent grant, and that results are even better for international teams. Our key finding is that the presence of a US entity, either as inventor or owner, plays an important role in securing the grant. For low innovative countries, other types of international collaborations also matter significantly pointing to the benefits for these countries to become more extrovert. We further find that a large part of the US ‘effect’ can be attributed to additional prosecution efforts, as it is evident by continuing patent applications.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: International collaborations, likelihood of patent grant, USPTO, continuing patent applications, patent assignments
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O34 - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital

References

Agiakloglou, C., K. Drivas, and D. Karamanis. "Individual Inventors and Market Potentials: Evidence from US Patents." Science and Public Policy 43, no. 2(2016): 147-56.

Alonso-Martínez, D. (2018). Social progress and international patent collaboration. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 134, 169-177.

Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist's companion. Princeton university press.

Balasubramanian, N., and J. Sivadasan. "What Happens When Firms Patent? New Evidence from U.S. Economic Census Data." Review of Economics and Statistics 93, no. 1(2011): 126-146.

Berger R (2005): A Study on the Cost of Patenting, prepared on behalf of the European Patent Office.

Bessen, J. (2008). The value of US patents by owner and patent characteristics. Research Policy, 37(5), 932-945.

Bessen, J., and M.J. Meurer. 2008. Patent failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers put Innovators at Risk: Princeton University Press.

Blundell, R., R. Griffith, and J. Van Reenen. "Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms." Review of Economic Studies 66, no. 3(1999): 529-554.

Breitzman, A., Thomas, P., & Cheney, M. (2002). Technological powerhouse or diluted competence: techniques for assessing mergers via patent analysis. R&D Management, 32(1), 1-10.

Chalioti, E., Drivas, K., Kalyvitis, S., & Katsimi, M. (2016). Innovation, Patents and Trade: A Firm-level Analysis.

de Rassenfosse, G., Jaffe, A. B., & Webster, E. (2016). Low-quality patents in the eye of the beholder: Evidence from multiple examiners (No. w22244). National Bureau of Economic Research.

de Rassenfosse, G., Raiteri, E., & Bekkers, R. (2017). Discrimination in the patent system: evidence from standard-essential patents.

de Rassenfosse, G., Jensen, P. H., Julius, T. M., Palangkaraya, A., & Webster, E. (2018). Getting Patents: Does the Quality of Patent Attorney Matter?. Alfons and Webster, Elizabeth M., Getting Patents: Does the Quality of Patent Attorney Matter.

Danguy, J., & de la Potterie, B. V. P. (2011). Cost-benefit analysis of the community patent. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2(2), 1-43.

Economics, E. (2014). Economic Analysis of the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court.

European Commission (2011) “Impact assessment accompanying document to the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and the Council implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of Unitary Patent protection and proposal for a Council regulation implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of Unitary Patent protection with regard to the applicable translation arrangements”

Ezcurra, R., & Pascual, P. (2008). Fiscal decentralization and regional disparities: evidence from several European Union countries. Environment and Planning A, 40(5), 1185-1201.

Frakes, M. D., & Wasserman, M. F. (2015). Does the US Patent and Trademark Office Grant Too Many Bad Patents: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment. Stan. L. Rev., 67, 613.

Frakes, M. D., and M. F. Wasserman. "Is the Time Allocated to Review Patent Applications Inducing Examiners to Grant Invalid Patents?: Evidence from Micro-Level Application Data." Review of Economics and Statistics (2016).

Geppert, K., & Stephan, A. (2008). Regional disparities in the European Union: Convergence and agglomeration. Papers in Regional Science, 87(2), 193-217.

Goertzel, B., Goertzel, T., & Goertzel, Z. (2017). The global brain and the emerging economy of abundance: Mutualism, open collaboration, exchange networks and the automated commons. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 65-73.

Graham, Stuart J.H. and Marco, Alan C. and Miller, Richard, The USPTO Patent Examination Research Dataset: A Window on the Process of Patent Examination (November 30, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2702637

Griliches, Z. "Market value, R&D, and patents." Economic Letters 7, no. 2(1981): 183-187.

Guellec, D., and B. van Pottelsberghe. 2000. "Applications, grants and the value of patent." Economics Letters 69:109-114.

Harhoff, D., K. Hoisl, B. Reichl, and B. van Pottelsberghe. "Patent Validation at the Country Level - The Role of Fees and Translation costs." Research Policy 38(2009): 1423-1437.

Heller, M.A., and R.S. Eisenberg. 1998. "Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research." Science 280:698-701.

Henkel, J., & Jell, F. (2010). Patent Pending–Why faster isn’t always better. Available at SSRN 1738912.

Jones, C.I. 2005. "The Shape of Production Functions and the Direction of Technical Change." Quarterly Journal of Economics 120:517–549.

Kaitila, V. (2004). Convergence of real GDP per capita in the EU15. How do the Accession Countries fit in? (No. 025).

Kuhn, J. M., & Thompson, N. (2017). The Ways We've Been Measuring Patent Scope are Wrong: How to Measure and Draw Causal Inferences with Patent Scope.

Lei, Z., & Wright, B. D. (2017). Why weak patents? Testing the examiner ignorance hypothesis. Journal of Public Economics, 148, 43-56.

Lemley, M. A., and B. Sampat. "Examiner characteristics and patent office outcomes." Review of Economics and Statistics 94, no. 3(2012): 817-827.

Lerner, J. 1994. "The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical-Analysis." Rand Journal of Economics 25(2):319-333.

Lerner, J. "The Empirical Impact of Intellectual Property Rights on Innovation: Puzzles and Clues." American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 99, no. 2(2009): 343-348.

Mann, R. J., & Sager, T. W. (2007). Patents, venture capital, and software start-ups. Research Policy, 36(2), 193-208.

Marco, Alan C., Graham, Stuart J.H., Myers, Amanda F., D'Agostino, Paul A and Apple, Kirsten, The USPTO Patent Assignment Dataset: Descriptions and Analysis (July 27, 2015). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2636461

Moser, P. "How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation? Evidence from Nineteenth-Century World's Fairs." American Economic Review 95, no. 4(2005): 1214-1236.

Murray, F., and S. Stern. 2007. "Do Formal Intellectual Property Rights Hinder the Free Flow of Scientific Knowledge? An Empirical Test of the Anti-Commons Hypothesis." Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 63:648-687.

Popp, D., T. Juhl, and D.K.N. Johnson. 2004. "Time in Purgatory: Examining the Grant Lag for U.S. Patent Applications." Topics in Economic Analysis and Policy 4(1 (Article 29)):1-43.

Quillen, C. D., and O. H. Webster. "Continuing patent applications and performance of the US Patent Office." Federal Circuit Bar Journal 11, no. 1(2001): 1-21.

Quillen, C. D., O. H. Webster, and R. Eichmann. "Continuing Patent Applications and Performance of the US Patent and Trademark Office-Extended." Federal Circuit Bar Journal 12, no. 1(2002): 35-55.

Regibeau, P.and K. Rockett. 2010. "Innovation Cycles and Learning at the Patent Office: Does the Early Patent Get the Delay?" Journal of Industrial Economics 58(2):222-246.

Sampat, B. N., & Shadlen, K. C. (2017). Secondary pharmaceutical patenting: A global perspective. Research Policy, 46(3), 693-707.

Sandner, P. G., and J. Block. "The market value of R&D, patents, and trademarks." Research Policy 40, no. 7(2011): 969-985.

Schettino, F., Sterlacchini, A., & Venturini, F. (2013). Inventive productivity and patent quality: Evidence from Italian inventors. Journal of Policy Modeling, 35(6), 1043-1056.

Schuett, F. "Patent quality and incentives at the patent office." Rand Journal of Economics 44, no. 2(2013): 313-336.

Scotchmer, S. (2004). Innovation and incentives. MIT press.

Singh, J., and L. Fleming. "Lone Inventors as Sources of Breakthroughs: Myth or Reality?" Management Science 56, no. 1(2010): 41-56.

Tseng, C. Y., & James Goo, Y. J. (2005). Intellectual capital and corporate value in an emerging economy: empirical study of Taiwanese manufacturers. R&D Management, 35(2), 187-201.

Van Zeebroeck, N., de la Potterie, B. V. P., & Guellec, D. (2009). Claiming more: the increased voluminosity of patent applications and its determinants. Research Policy, 38(6), 1006-1020.

Webster, E., P. H. Jensen, and A. Palangkaraya. "Patent examination outcomes and the national treatment principle." Rand Journal of Economics 45, no. 2(2014): 449-469.

Webster, E., Palangkaraya, A., & Jensen, P. H. (2007). Characteristics of international patent application outcomes. Economics Letters, 95(3), 362-368.

Yamauchi, I., & Nagaoka, S. (2015). An economic analysis of deferred examination system: Evidence from a policy reform in Japan. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 39, 19-28.