АНАЛИЗ НА ФОРМИРАНЕТО И ПРИЛАГАНЕТО НА БЮДЖЕТНИ ПОЛИТИКИ, ОСИГУРЯВАЩИ СОЦИАЛНО-ИКОНОМИЧЕСКОТО РАЗВИТИЕ НА АДМИНИСТРАТИВНОТЕРИТОРИАЛНИТЕ ЕДИНИЦИ

Abuselidze, George (2019): АНАЛИЗ НА ФОРМИРАНЕТО И ПРИЛАГАНЕТО НА БЮДЖЕТНИ ПОЛИТИКИ, ОСИГУРЯВАЩИ СОЦИАЛНО-ИКОНОМИЧЕСКОТО РАЗВИТИЕ НА АДМИНИСТРАТИВНОТЕРИТОРИАЛНИТЕ ЕДИНИЦИ. Published in: Economic Archive No. 2

Abstract

The main function of the state in nowadays-civilized world is to maintain the macroeconomic proportions throughout the country and avoid financial and economic crisis in regions that have priority in the formation of the new economic system in Georgia. The object of the research is the formation and use of Budget policy of Georgia; One of the most problematic places is socio-economic development of territorial units. As a result of the research it is shown that current economic and political system’s radical transformation process, creation of new economic system and ensuring its efficiency, requires mobilization of huge financial resources, which is impossible without proper functioning of the financial mechanism. This in turn requires implementation of sufficient financial and economic policy. The government should take responsibility of supporting financial-economic independence for territorial units. In the future, the proposed forms of financial mechanisms and features of use for the arrangement and territorial integrity of the government.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Analysis of the formation and use of budgetary policies ensuring the socio-economic development of territorial units
• Language: Bulgarian
• Keywords: Fiscal policy; State and local budget; Intergovernmental relations; Forms of financial mechanisms; Georgia
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy; H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H61 - Budget ; Budget Systems; H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H72 - State and Local Budget and Expenditures; H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H75 - State and Local Government: Health ; Education ; Welfare ; Public Pensions; H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H76 - State and Local Government: Other Expenditure Categories; H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H77 - Intergovernmental Relations ; Federalism ; Secession

References

Abuselidze, G. (2013). Areas of Improvement of Finance Policy in the Process of Advancing of Upgrading the Territorial Economic Activity and Financial Capacity. International Business Research, 6(5). DOI:https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v6n5p194.

Abuselidze, G. (2015). Formation of Tax Policy in the Aspect of the Optimal Tax Burden. International Review of Management and Business Research, 4(3).

Abuselidze, G. (2018). Fiscal policy directions of small enterprises and anti- crisis measures on modern stage: During the transformation of Georgia to the EU. Science and Studies of Accounting and Finance: Problems and Perspectives, 12(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15544/ ssaf.2018.01.

Abuselidze, G. (2018). Georgia’s capital market: Functioning Problems and Development Directions in Association with EU. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Volume XIII, Winter, 7(61).

Abuselidze, G. (2018). Optimal Fiscal Policy – Factors for the Formation of the Optimal Economic and Social Models. Journal of Business and Economics Review, 3(1). Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.

Abuselidze, G., & Slobodyanik, A. (2018). Overview welfare in Georgia and prospects of formation of effective economic and social models. Сучасні питання економіки і права [Modern Questions of Economics and Law], 2(8).

Austin, B., Glaeser, E., & Summers, L. (2018). Saving the heartland: Place- based policies in 21st century America. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. BPEA Conference Drafts, March 8-9, 2018.

Bahl, R. (1999). Implementation Rules for Fiscal Decentralization: International Studies: Program Working Paper. 1. Atlanta: Georgia State University.

Blöchliger, H., Merk, O., Charbit, C., & Mizell, L. (2007). Fiscal equalisation in OECD countries, OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism, No. 4, OECD Publishing, Paris.

Busso, M., Gregory, J., & Kline, P. (2013). Assessing the incidence and efficiency of a prominent place-based policy. American Economic Review 103(2), 897-947.

Demydenko, L. М. (2012). The role of local taxes in the formation of revenues of local government budgets. [Rol mestnyih nalogov v formirovanii dohodov byudzhetov organov mestnogo samouprav-leniya]. Vestnik KNU im. T.G. Shevchenko. Sbornik nauchnyih trudov. Vyipusk 70. Kiev. 2012. p. 21-23. Seriya «Ekonomika».

Dvoyenosenko, S. (2004). The problems of decentralization of development management in interaction with financial stability of regions [Problemy detsentralizatsii upravleniya razvitiem vo vzaimodeystvii s finansovoy ustoychivostyu regionov]. Upravlenie sovremennym gorodom. 2004. № 10-12. p. 143-152.

Ehrlich, M. Von & T. Seidel. (2018). The persistence effects of place-based policies. Evidence from the West-German Zonenrandgebiet. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, forthcoming.

GDP and Other Indicators of National Accounts [Data file]. (2019). National Statistics office of Georgia. Retrieved from http://www.geostat.ge.

Glaeser, E., & Gottlieb, J. (2008). The economics of place-making policies. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity Spring: 155-253.

Henkel, M., Seidel, T., & Suedekum, J. (2018). Fiscal Transfers in the Spatial Economy.

Ishina, I. (2012). Trends in Budget Capacity Building and Development. European Journal of Business and Economics, 4, pp. 26-28.

Khaleghian, P. (2003). Decentralization and Public Services the Case of Immunization. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

Khanduev, P. Z., & Tsydenmunkuev, T. C. (2007). Analysis of interbudgetary financial flows in the Republic of Buryatia in 2001–2005. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 18(5), 557-560.

Kline, P., & Moretti, E. (2014). Local economic development, agglomeration economies and the big push: 100 years of evidence from the Tennessee Valley Authority. Quarterly Journal of Economics 129(1), 275-331.

Kliyanenko B., & Grechana, S. (2013). Using the model of German budgetary federalism [Ispolzovanie modeli nemetskogo byudzhetnogo fede- ralizma]. Finansy. 2013. № 6. p. 48-57.

Kolodko, G. W. (1999). Ten years of post-socialist transition: lessons for policy reform. The World Bank. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-2095.

Oates, W. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. N.Y.: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Reshina, G., & Vocish, A. (2011). Prospective budgetary planning as a basic for regional development. Peculiarities of the immovable property tax policy for sustainable development in, p. 44-49.

Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018). The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it), Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11(1), 189-209.