Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano and Lamonaca, Emilia and Tappi, Marco and Di Gioia, Leonardo (2020): On the Environmental Impacts of Voluntary Animal-based Policies in the EU: Technical and Political Considerations. Forthcoming in: Environmental Science and Policy
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_99932.pdf Download (447kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The livestock sector has a large influence on direct and indirect (via land use change) greenhouse gas emissions, with potential negative impacts on climate change. We quantify the environmental impacts related to the introduction of a voluntary animal-based policy supported by the European Union (EU), the Measure 14 of Rural Development Programmes 2014-2020 on animal welfare. We focus on methane and nitrous oxide emissions (direct impacts), and on carbon-based and nitrous oxide emissions from land use change (indirect impacts). Our case study is the dairy sector of the EU Member States. We found that the animal-based measures have (on average) limited environmental impacts, although marked differences exist across Member States.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | On the Environmental Impacts of Voluntary Animal-based Policies in the EU: Technical and Political Considerations |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Animal welfare; Emission; EU policy; Livestock; Rural development. |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q18 - Agricultural Policy ; Food Policy Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth |
Item ID: | 99932 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Fabio Gaetano Santeramo |
Date Deposited: | 29 Apr 2020 13:52 |
Last Modified: | 29 Apr 2020 13:52 |
References: | Baldoni, E., Coderoni, S., Esposti, R., 2018. The complex farm-level relationship between environmental performance and productivity: The case of carbon footprint of Lombardy farms. Environmental Science & Policy 89, 73-82. Berger, G., Kaechele, H., Pfeffer, H., 2006. The greening of the European common agricultural policy by linking the European-wide obligation of set-aside with voluntary agri-environmental measures on a regional scale. Environmental Science & Policy 9(6), 509-524. Bosomworth, K., Leith, P., Harwood, A., Wallis, P.J., 2017. What’s the problem in adaptation pathways planning? The potential of a diagnostic problem-structuring approach. Environmental Science & Policy 76, 23-28. Casey, J.W., Holden, N.M., 2006. Quantification of GHG emissions from sucker-beef production in Ireland. Agricultural Systems 90(1-3), 79-98. Cederberg, C., Stadig, M., 2003. System expansion and allocation in life cycle assessment of milk and beef production. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 8(6), 350-356. Chiron, F., Princé, K., Paracchini, M.L., Bulgheroni, C., Jiguet, F., 2013. Forecasting the potential impacts of CAP-associated land use changes on farmland birds at the national level. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 176, 17–23. Coderoni, S., Esposti, R., 2018. CAP payments and agricultural GHG emissions in Italy. A farm-level assessment. Science of the Total Environment 627, 427-437. Cortignani, R., Dono, G., 2018. Agricultural policy and climate change: an integrated assessment of the impacts on an agricultural area of Southern Italy. Environmental Science & Policy 81, 26–35. Cortignani, R., Severini, S., Dono, G., 2017. Complying with greening practices in the new CAP direct payments: an application on Italian specialized arable farms. Land Use Policy 61, 265–275. Dono, G., Giraldo, L., Nazzaro, E., 2013. Contribution of the calving interval to dairy farm profitability: results of a cluster analysis of FADN data for a major milk production area in southern Italy. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research (4), 857-868. Edwards-Jones, G., Plassmann, K., York, E.H., Hounsome, B., Jones, D.L., i Canals, L.M., 2009. Vulnerability of exporting nations to the development of a carbon label in the United Kingdom. Environmental Science & Policy 12(4), 479-490. EFSA, 2009. Scientific Opinion on the overall effects of farming systems on dairy cow welfare and disease. EFSA Journal 1143, 38 pp. EFSA, 2012. Scientific Opinion on the use of animal-based measures to assess welfare of dairy cows. EFSA Journal 10(1), 2554. FAO, 2011. World livestock 2011-livestock in food security. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Feliciano, D., Slee, B., Hunter, C., Smith, P., 2013. Estimating the contribution of rural land uses to greenhouse gas emissions: A case study of North East Scotland. Environmental Science & Policy 25, 36-49. Garnett, T., 2009. Livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions: impacts and options for policy makers. Environmental Science & Policy 12(4), 491-503. Grossi, G., Vitali, A., Lacetera, N., Nardone, A., Bernabucci, U., 2017. Comparison between cow milk and soymilk combining nutritional values and greenhouse gas data. In: ASPA 22nd Congress Book of Abstracts, Italian Journal of Animal Science, 16(1), 1-280. Hadorn, G.H., Brun, G., Soliva, C.R., Stenke, A., Peter, T., 2015. Decision strategies for policy decisions under uncertainties: The case of mitigation measures addressing methane emissions from ruminants. Environmental Science & Policy 52, 110-119. Havlík, P., Valin, H., Mosnier, A., Obersteiner, M., Baker, J.S., Herrero, M., Rufino, M.C., Schmid, E., 2012. Crop productivity and the global livestock sector: Implications for land use change and greenhouse gas emissions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 95(2), 442-448. Ingenbleek, P.T., Immink, V.M., Spoolder, H.A., Bokma, M.H., Keeling, L.J., 2012. EU animal welfare policy: Developing a comprehensive policy framework. Food Policy 37(6), 690-699. Llonch, P., Haskell, M.J., Dewhurst, R.J., Turner, S.P., 2017. Current available strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in livestock systems: an animal welfare perspective. Animal 11(2), 274-284. Lovett, D.K., Shalloo, L., Dillon, P., O’Mara, F.P., 2006. A systems approach to quantify greenhouse gas fluxes from pastoral dairy production as affected by management regime. Agricultural Systems 88 (2–3), 156–179 Mekonnen, M.M., Hoekstra, A.Y., 2012. A global assessment of the water footprint of farm animal products. Ecosystems 15(3), 401-415. Olesen, J.E., Schelde, K., Weiske, A., Weisbjerg, M.R., Asman, W.A., Djurhuus, J., 2006. Modelling greenhouse gas emissions from European conventional and organic dairy farms. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 112(2-3), 207-220. Place, S.E., Mitloehner, F.M., 2014. The nexus of environmental quality and livestock welfare. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences 2(1), 555-569. Santeramo, F. G., Lamonaca, E., Tappi, M., Di Gioia, L. 2019. Considerations on the environmental and social sustainability of animal-based policies. Sustainability, 11(8), 2316. Santeramo, F. G., Carlucci, D., De Devitiis, B., Seccia, A., Stasi, A., Viscecchia, R., Nardone, G. 2018. Emerging trends in European food, diets and food industry. Food Research International, 104, 39-47. Santeramo, F. G., Lamonaca, E. 2020. Evaluation of geographical label in consumers’ decision-making process: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Food Research International. Schils, R.L.M., Verhagen, A., Aarts, H.F.M., Šebek, L.B.J., 2005. A farm level approach to define successful mitigation strategies for GHG emissions from ruminant livestock systems. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 71(2), 163-175. Solazzo, R., Donati, M., Tomasi, L., Arfini, F., 2016. How effective is greening policy in reducing GHG emissions from agriculture? Evidence from Italy. Science of the Total Environment 573, 1115–1124. Soussana, J.F., Tallec, T., Blanfort, V., 2010. Mitigating the greenhouse gas balance of ruminant production systems through carbon sequestration in grasslands. Animal 4(3), 334-350. Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V. de Haan, C., 2006. Livestock’s Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Tricase, C., Lamonaca, E., Ingrao, C., Bacenetti, J., Lo Giudice, A., 2018. A comparative Life Cycle Assessment between organic and conventional barley cultivation for sustainable agriculture pathways. Journal of Cleaner Production 172, 3747-3759. Venghaus, S., Hake, J.F., 2018. Nexus thinking in current EU policies–The interdependencies among food, energy and water resources. Environmental Science & Policy [forthcoming]. Zandvoort, M., Campos, I.S., Vizinho, A., Penha-Lopes, G., Lorencová, E.K., van der Brugge, R., van der Vlista, M.J., van den Brinka, A., Jeuken, A.B., 2017. Adaptation pathways in planning for uncertain climate change: Applications in Portugal, the Czech Republic and the Netherlands. Environmental Science & Policy 78, 18-26. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/99932 |