Aso, Hiroki (2020): Demographic transition and Economic development : the role of child costs.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_99966.pdf Download (568kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Abstract This paper analyzes the interactions between demographic transition and economic development, focusing on two child costs: time child-rearing cost and physical child-rearing cost. To analyze the interactions, we construct two overlapping generations model: human capital accumulation model and physical capital accumulation model. The two child costs, in particular, physical child cost plays crucial role in appearing non-monotonous fertility dynamics since it generates income effect. In both growth models, increase in physical child cost decreases the fertility, while it promotes economic development by dilution effect. Since increase in physical child cost encourages to start investing in human capital, it facilitates more rapid the timing of demographic transition in human capital accumulation model and therefore it gets the economy out of development trap. In contrast, it slows down the timing in physical capital accumulation model due to increase in income effect.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Demographic transition and Economic development : the role of child costs |
English Title: | Demographic transition and Economic development : the role of child costs |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Demographic transition, Economic development, Child costs, Overlapping generations model. |
Subjects: | I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I25 - Education and Economic Development J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J11 - Demographic Trends, Macroeconomic Effects, and Forecasts J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J13 - Fertility ; Family Planning ; Child Care ; Children ; Youth O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development |
Item ID: | 99966 |
Depositing User: | Hiroki Aso |
Date Deposited: | 02 May 2020 10:13 |
Last Modified: | 02 May 2020 10:13 |
References: | Azarnert, L.V. (2006). Child mortality, fertility and human capital accumulation. Journal of Population Economics. 19, 285-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-005-0020-4. Barro, R., & Becker, G. S. (1989). Fertility choice in a model of economic growth. Econometrica, 57, 481-501. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/1912563. Becker, G. S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In National Bureau of Economic Research (ed.), Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries. pp. 209-231. Pricenton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Becker, G.S., & Lewis, H. G. (1973). On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 279-288. https://doi.org/10.1086/260166. Becker, S. O., Cinnirella, F., & Woessmann, L. (2010). The trade-off between fertility and education: evidence from before the demographic transition. Journal of Economic Growth, 15, 177-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-010-9054-x. Ca ́ceres-Delpiano, J. (2006). The impacts of family size on investment in child quality. Journal of Human Resources, 41, 722-737. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.XLI.4.738. Cervellati, M. & Sunde, U. (2011). Life expectancy and economic growth: the role of the demographic transition. Journal Economic Growth, 16, 99-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-011-9065-2. Cervellati, M. & Sunde, U. (2015). The Economic and Demographic Transition, Mortality, and Comparative Development. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 7, 189-225. https://doi.org/ 10.1257/mac.20130170. Chakraborty, S. (2004). Endogenous lifetime and economic growth. Journal of Economic Theory, 116, 119-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2003.07.005. Doepke, M. (2005). Child mortality and fertility decline: Does the Barro-Becker model fit the facts? Journal of Population Economics, 18, 337-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-004-0208-z. De la Croix, D., & Doepke, M. (2003). Inequality and growth: why differential fertility matters. American Economic Review, 96, 499-522. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803769206214. Fanti, L., & Gori, L. (2014). Endogenous fertility, endogenous lifetime and economic growth: the role of child policies. Journal of Population Economics, 27, 529-564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-013-0472-x. Fernihough, A. (2017). Human capital and the quantity-quality trade-off during the demographic transition. Journal of Economic Growth, 22, 35-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-016-9138-3. Fioroni, T. (2010). Child mortality and fertility: public vs private education. Journal of Population Economics, 23, 73- 97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-009-0248-5. Galor, O. (2005a). From stagnation to growth: unified growth theory. In Aghion, P., & Durlauf S. N. (eds), Handbook of economic growth, vol 1A. Elsevier, Amsterdam. Galor, O. (2005b). The demographic transition and the emergence of sustained economic growth. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3, 494-504. https://doi.org/10.1162/jeea.2005.3.2-3.494. Galor, O. (2012). The demographic transition: causes and consequences. Cliometrica, 6, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11698-011-0062-7. Galor, O., & Weil, D. N. (1999). From Malthusian stagnation to modern growth. American Economic Review, 89, 150-154. https://doi.org/ 10.1257/aer.89.2.150. Galor, O., & Weil, D. N. (2000). Population, technology, and growth: From Malthusian stagnation to the demographic transition and beyond. American Economic Review, 90, 806-828. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.4.806. Jones, C. I. (2001). Was an industrial revolution inevitable? Economic growth over the very long run. The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, 1, 1-45. https://doi.org/10.2202/1534-6013.1028. Manfredi, P., & Fanti, L. (2006) Demography in macroeconomic models: When labour supply matters for economic cycles. Metroeonomica, 57, 536-563. Mateos-Planas, Xavier. (2002) The Demographic Transition in Europe: A Neoclassical Dynastic Approach. Review of Economic Dynamics, 5, 646-680. https://doi.org/10.1006/redy.2001.0156. Liao, P. (2011). Does demographic change matter for growth? European Economic Review, 55, 659-677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2010.09.006. Murphy, T. E. (2009). Old habits die hard (sometimes): What can de ́partment heterogeneity tell us about the French fertility decline? Technical report, MIMEO. Nakamura, T. (2018). Solow meets Stone-Geary: Technological progress and the demographic transition. Metroeconomica, 69, 768-790. https://doi.org/10.1111/meca.12212. Soares, R. P. (2005). Mortality reductions, educational attainment and fertility choice. American Economic Review, 95, 580-601. https://doi.org/ 10.1257/0002828054201486. Strulik, H. (2003). Mortality, the trade-off between child quality and quantity, and demo-economic development. Metroeonomica, 54, 499-520. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-999X.00177. Strulik, H., & Weisdorf, J. (2014). How child costs and survival shaped the industrial revolution and the demographic transition. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 18, 114-144. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100512000302 Willis, R. J. (1973). A new approach to the economic theory of fertility behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 81(2, Part 2), S14-S64. https://doi.org/10.1086/260152. Yakita, A. (2001). Uncertain lifetime, fertility and social security. Journal of Population Economics, 14, 635-640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480000049 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/99966 |