Blogg, Jonathan (2020): The Myths and Facts of Patent Troll and Excessive Payment: Have Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs) Been Overcompensated? - A Commentary.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_100069.pdf Download (297kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The much-cited article ‘the Myths and Facts of Patent Troll and Excessive Payment: Have Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs) Been Overcompensated ’ by Jack J. Lu is fundamentally flawed and based on data which cannot be retrieved. The key error results from poorly defined samples, selected to substantiate the statement that hold-up does not exist and that Non-Practicing Entities are not overcompensated. Even if the article had succeeded in adequately selecting the samples subject to the analysis, the document would still fall short of determining what constitutes a comparable licensing agreement. Also, the findings cannot be verified as the article does not disclose the underlying data that leads to the conclusion that NPEs are not overpaid. Hence, the paper falls short of meeting three fundamental requirements of empirical research. There is no adequate selection of the two samples that are compared (the NPE sample and a vaguely defined sample of ‘other companies’), there is also no adequate selection of comparable rates and last but not least, the data cannot be retrieved. Other than that, the research paper suffers from the application of concepts which are not defined and lacks adequate references to the academic literature. These aspects taken together mean that it is not possible to draw any sorts of conclusions on the grounds of the analysis presented and render the article obsolete.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Myths and Facts of Patent Troll and Excessive Payment: Have Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs) Been Overcompensated? - A Commentary |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | hold-up, Non Producing Entities, NPEs, licensing rate, valuation, Patents, unfair excessive pricing |
Subjects: | K - Law and Economics > K1 - Basic Areas of Law K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K21 - Antitrust Law K - Law and Economics > K3 - Other Substantive Areas of Law O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O34 - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital |
Item ID: | 100069 |
Depositing User: | Mr Jonathan Blogg |
Date Deposited: | 15 May 2020 05:11 |
Last Modified: | 15 May 2020 05:11 |
References: | Chien, C. V. (2017). The Market for Software Innovation Through the Lens of Patent Licenses and Sales. Berkeley Tech. LJ (2017), 31. Cooper, L. (2014). Patent Trolls and Other Bad Guys. Journal of Information Ethics, 23(2), 57. Coursey, C. C. (2009). Battling the patent troll: tips for defending patent infringement claims by non-manufacturing patentees. Am. J. Trial Advoc., 33, 237. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp., 318 F.Supp. 1116, 1120, 1121. 318 F. Supp. 1116 (S.D.N.Y. 1970) at 1120 Heinecke, G. (2015). Pay the Troll Toll: The Patent Troll Model Is Fundamentally at Odds with the Patent System's Goals of Innovation and Competition. Fordham L. Rev., 84, 1153. Helmers, C., Love, B., & McDonagh, L. (2013). Is there a patent troll problem in the UK. Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. LJ, 24, 509, Koss, P. A., & Eaton, B. C. (1997). Co-specific investments, hold-up and self-enforcing contracts. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 32(3), 457-470. ktMine Terms and Conditions of use for ktMine. Available at http://rrf.ktmine.com/TermsOfService.aspx (last checked 1.4.2020) Lu, J. J. (2012). The myths and facts of patent troll and excessive payment: have nonpracticing entities (NPEs) been overcompensated? Business Economics, 47, p.234. Title of the article Luman III, J. F., & Dodson, C. L. (2006). No longer a myth, the emergence of the patent troll: stifling innovation, increasing litigation, and extorting billions. Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal, 18(5), 12-16, McMahon, T. P., Akerley, S. J., & Bu, J. H. (2006). Who Is a Troll: Not a Simple Answer. In Sedona Conf. J. (Vol. 7, p. 159). RoyaltySource Data Use Agreement. Available at https://royaltysource.com/data_use_agreement.html (last checked 1.4.2020) Shapiro, C. (2010). Injunctions, hold-up, and patent royalties. American Law and Economics Review, 12(2), 280-318 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/100069 |