Ketenci, Natalya (2019): Nuclear Energy of Turkey in the context of the Russian experience. Forthcoming in:
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_100074.pdf Download (153kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Nuclear energy has become one of the widely discussed topics in Turkey due to the controversial points of view. Turkey is new to nuclear power; the construction of the first nuclear reactor started in April of 2018. Production of electricity in Turkey is highly dependent on imported energy sources. Continuously increasing energy prices and foreign energy supply reduce national energy security and undermine the sustainable economic growth of the country, whose exports heavily depend on foreign energy sources. Therefore; one of the solutions to decrease dependence on foreign energy sources for such an industrial country, as Turkey, is to produce nuclear energy. Opinions of specialists and the population are divided in controversial groups, where advantages and disadvantages of nuclear power oppose each other. This chapter analyses the usage of nuclear power in the world and reasons for countries, which have reduced or vice versa increased the implementation of nuclear energy. The Russian company conducts the construction of the first nuclear plant in Turkey, therefore history and experience of Russia in nuclear energy are analysed in this chapter. The discussion on benefits and weaknesses of Russian experiences and how they can be applied to new a Turkish nuclear industry conclude the chapter.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Nuclear Energy of Turkey in the context of the Russian experience. |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | nuclear energy; Turkey; Russia |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation > Q37 - Issues in International Trade Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q43 - Energy and the Macroeconomy Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q50 - General |
Item ID: | 100074 |
Depositing User: | Natalya Ketenci |
Date Deposited: | 10 May 2020 15:30 |
Last Modified: | 10 May 2020 15:30 |
References: | Akyuz, E. (2015) Turkey’s Nuclear Energy Policy and the Terrorist Threat. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 40: 523-536. Akyuz, E . (2017) Advantages and Disadvantages of Nuclear Energy in Turkey: Public Perception. Eurasian Journal of Environmental Research 1(1): 1-11. Erdogdu, E. (2007) Nuclear Power in Open Energy Markets: A Case Study of Turkey. Energy Policy, 35(5):3061-3073. IAEA (2018) Country Nuclear Power Profiles – Turkey. International Atomic Energy Agency. Hibbs, M. (2018) The Future of nuclear power in China. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Washington. Kok, B. and Benli, H. (2017) Energy diversity and nuclear energy for sustainable development in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 111, 870-877. Kurt, U. (2014) The fuzzy TOPSIS and generalized Choquet fuzzy integral algorithm for nuclear power plant site selection – a case study from Turkey. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 51(10):1241-1255. MENR, Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources of Republic of Turkey, Natural Gas Pipelines and Projects. Ozcan, M., Yildirim, M. and Ozturk, S. (2016) Generation expansion planning scenarios to reduce natural gas dependency of Turkey. Energy Exploration and Exploitation, 34(2):244-261. Rosatom, Russian State Atomic Energy Corporation, rosatom.ru Sirin, S.M. (2010). An assessment of Turkey’s nuclear energy policy in light of South Korea’s nuclear experience. Energy Policy, 38(10):6145-6152. The Economist (02.04.2018). The World relies on Russia to build its nuclear power plants. WDI, World Development Indicators. WNA, World Nuclear Association. WEO, 2017. World Energy Outlook, International Energy Agency. WNA. World Nuclear Association. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/100074 |