A propensity score matching analysis of the relationship between forest resources and household welfare in Vietnam

Hoang Van, Cuong Van and Tran Quang, Tuyen and Nguyen Thi, Yen and Lan Nguyen, Thanh (2019): A propensity score matching analysis of the relationship between forest resources and household welfare in Vietnam. Forthcoming in: Natural Resources Forum

Abstract

Using secondary data from a socio-economic quantitative household survey in of the North Central region of Vietnam, the main aim of our study is to analyze the causal effect of forest resources on household income and poverty. Based on the observed characteristics of a forest-based livelihood and forest-related activities, we use a propensity score matching (PSM) method to control for potential bias arising from self-selection. The PSM results indicate that households with a forest livelihood had a higher level of income and lower level of poverty than did those without. Interestingly, our findings confirm that a forest-based livelihood offers much higher income than any other type of livelihood adopted by local households. Also, the poverty rate among households with a forest livelihood is lower than those earning non-labor income or engaged in wage/crop and crop livelihoods. Moreover, households whose livelihoods depend on timber forest products (TFPs) and animals (non-TFPs) also had higher income and lower levels of poverty than did those lacking these resources. Among households and provinces, we find differing opportunities deriving from forest resources, suggesting that there are potential barriers hindering local households from pursuing a forest livelihood or participating in some forest activities. Therefore, government policy and regulations on forest management should focus on improving the access of households to forest resources, at the same time enhancing the sustainability of these resources.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: forest resources; household income; livelihood; poverty; rural livelihood.
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy ; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R2 - Household Analysis

References

Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2016). Matching on the estimated propensity score. Econometrica, 84(2), 781-807.

Adam, Y., & Eltayeb, A. (2016). Forestry decentralization and poverty alleviation: A review. Forest Policy and Economics, 73, 300-307.

Ali, A., & Bahadur, R. D. (2018). Forest-based livelihoods, income, and poverty: Empirical evidence from the Himalayan region of rural Pakistan. Journal of Rural Studies, 57, 44-54.

Angelsen, A., Jagger, P., Babigumira, R., Belcher, B., Hogarth, N. J., Bauch, S., . . . Wunder, S. (2014).

Environmental income and rural livelihoods: a global-comparative analysis. World Development, 64, S12-S28.

Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of economic surveys, 22(1), 31-72.

D'Agostino Jr, R. B. (1998). Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non‐randomized control group. Statistics in medicine, 17(19), 2265-2281.

Das, N. (2010). Incidence of forest income on reduction of inequality: Evidence from forest dependent households in milieu of joint forest management. Ecological Economics, 69(8), 1617-1625.

Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Review of Economics and statistics, 84(1), 151-161.

Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basis Econometrics: Mc Graw- Hill International Edition.

Halpin, B. (2016). DUDAHART: Stata module to calculate and graph Duda-Hart cluster stopping indices from distance matrix. Boston: Boston College Department of Economics.

Kar, S. P., & Jacobson, M. G. (2012). NTFP income contribution to household economy and related socio-economic factors: Lessons from Bangladesh. Forest Policy and Economics, 14(1), 136-142.

Khundi, F., Jagger, P., Shively, G., & Sserunkuuma, D. (2011). Income, poverty and charcoal production in Uganda. Forest Policy and Economics, 13(3), 199-205.

Mcelwee, P. D. (2008). Forest environmental income in Vietnam: household socioeconomic factors influencing forest use. Environmental conservation, 35(2), 147-159.

MDRI. (2016). Quantitative socio-economic survey for Emission Reduction Program (ER-P) provinces area. Hanoi, Vietnam: Mekong Development Research Institute.

Mooi, E., Sarstedt, M., & Mooi-Reci, I. (2018). Cluster Analysis. In Market Research: The Process, Data, and Methods Using Stata (pp. 313-366). Singapore: Springer Singapore.

Nguyen, C. V., Tran, T. Q., & Vu, H. V. (2017). Ethnic Minorities in Northern Mountains of Vietnam: Employment, Poverty and Income. Social Indicators Research, 134(1), 93-115.

Nguyen, T. V., & Tran, T. Q. (2018). Forestland and rural household livelihoods in the North Central Provinces, Vietnam. Land Use Policy, 79, 10-19.

Rahut, D. B., Behera, B., & Ali, A. (2016). Do forest resources help increase rural household income and alleviate rural poverty? Empirical evidence from Bhutan. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 25(3), 187-198.

Scott, A. J., & Knott, M. (1974). A cluster analysis method for grouping means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics, 507-512.

Shackleton, C. M., Shackleton, S. E., Buiten, E., & Bird, N. (2007). The importance of dry woodlands and forests in rural livelihoods and poverty alleviation in South Africa. Forest Policy and Economics, 9(5), 558-577.

Sunderlin, W. D., & Huynh, T. B. (2005). Poverty alleviation and forests in Vietnam. Jakarta, Indonesia: CIFOR.

Tran, T. A., Tran, T. Q., Tran N.T., & Nguyen, H. T. (2018). The role of education in the livelihood of households in the Northwest region, Vietnam. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 1-26.

Tran, T. Q. (2015). Nonfarm employment and household income among ethnic minorities in Vietnam. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 28(1), 703-716.

Uberhuaga, P., Smith-Hall, C., & Helles, F. (2012). Forest income and dependency in lowland Bolivia. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 14(1), 3-23.

Van Hoang, C., Tran, T. Q., Nguyen, Y. H. T., & Nguyen, K. D. (2019). Is Land Ownership a Key Factor in the Choice of Livelihood in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam? Human Ecology, 1-11.

Walelign, S. Z., Charlery, L., Smith-Hall, C., Chhetri, B. B. K., & Larsen, H. O. (2016). Environmental income improves household-level poverty assessments and dynamics. Forest Policy and Economics, 71, 23-35.

WB. (2016). Sustainable Plantation and Livelihoods for Low-income Farmers. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/results/2016/04/12/vietnam-sustainable-plantation-and-livelihoods-for-low-income-farmers

Wooldridge, J. M. (2016). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach: Nelson Education.