Przybyla, Katarzyna and Kachniarz, Marian and Ramsey, David (2020): The investment activity of cities in the context of their administrative status: A case study from Poland. Published in: Cities , Vol. 97, (1 February 2020): p. 102505.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_100230.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
The article attempts to identify and assess the investment activity of major Polish cities, taking into account the division into voivodship cities, remaining the regional capitals, and also the ones which, as a result of public administration system reform, carried out in Poland in the 1990s, lost this function. Based on the group of diagnostic features (city investment expenditure per capita, capital expenditure of cities in relation to their total expenditure, capital expenditure of cities in relation to their own revenues), taxonomic synthetic measures for the studied cities were constructed. The research covered the years 2004 – 2015 – the period of particular investment intensity caused by the inflow of EU funds. It was concluded that even though the city status and revenue potential is, to some extent, determined by its investment activity, there are, however, clear examples showing that the appropriate local policy can modify these determinants.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The investment activity of cities in the context of their administrative status: A case study from Poland |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | voivodship cities, investment local government, administrative reform |
Subjects: | R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes |
Item ID: | 100230 |
Depositing User: | Prof. David M. Ramsey |
Date Deposited: | 09 May 2020 12:53 |
Last Modified: | 09 May 2020 12:53 |
References: | 1. Dascher Kristof (2000), Are politics and geography related?: Evidence from a cross- section of capital cities, Public Choice 3/4, pp. 373-392. 2. Kachniarz Marian (2014), Prymusi i maruderzy - aktywność inwestycyjna gmin dolnośląskich [Overachievers and laggards – investment activity of Lower Silesian municipalities], In: Gospodarka przestrzenna. Aktualne aspekty polityki społeczno – gospodarczej i przestrzennej [Spatial economy. Current aspects of socio-economic and spatial policy], Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics No. 367, Wrocław, pp.112-118. 3. Kazak Jan, van Hoof Joost, Szewranski Szymon, Challenges in the wind turbines location process in Central Europe – The use of spatial decision support systems, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Volume 76, September 2017, pp. 425-433. 4. Komorowski Józef W. (2012), Miasta wojewódzkie a miasta postwojewódzkie w Polsce – zróżnicowanie i zmiany poziomu gospodarczego w pierwszej dekadzie XXI wieku [Voivodship cities vs. post-voivodship cities in Poland – diversification and economic level changes in the first decade of 21st century], Studia Miejskie [Urban Studies] 8, pp. 9-25. 5. Kunasz Marek (2006), Przykład zastosowania metod WAP do analizy procesów gospodarowania zasobami ludzkimi [The example of WAP methods application to analyse the processes of human resources management], In: Kapitał ludzki w gospodarce opartej na wiedzy [Human capital in knowledge-based economy], edited by Danuta Kopycińska, Unversity of Szczecin, Szczecin, pp. 131-139. 6. Kurniewicz Anna, Swianiewicz Paweł (2016), Ból fantomowy czy realna strata? Wpływ utraty statusu stolicy województwa na rozwój gospodarczy i miejsce w hierarchii systemu osadniczego [Phantom pain or real loss? The impact of voivodship capital status loss on economic development and place in the settlement system hierarchy], Studies in Geography, vol. 61.2, pp. 25-50. 7. Leigh Nancey G., Blakely Edward J. (2012), Planning Local Economic Development: Theory and Practice, SAGE, Los Angeles. 8. Łukomska Julita (2011), Byłe stolice województw 10 lat po reformie, [Former voivodship capitals 10 years after the reform], In: Subregionalne bieguny wzrostu [Sub-regional growth poles] edited by Wojciech Dziemianowicz, Jacek Szlachta, Katarzyna Szmigiel- Rawska University of Warsaw, Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, Warsaw, pp. 59–70. 9. Ma Laurence JC. (2005), Urban administrative restructuring, changing scale relations and local economic development in China, Political Geography, 4.24, pp. 477-497. 10. Mann H. and Whitney D. (1947), On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, 504. 11. Ministry of Economic Development (2016), The implementation of the European Union Funds - status as at the end of December, Warsaw. 12. Nowosielska Ewa (1992), Teoria Christallera – prawda i mity [Christaller's theory – the truth and myths], Geographic Documentation of the Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization at Polish Academy of Sciences, Bulletin 3. 13. Paddison R. (1983), The fragmented state: The political geography of power, Basil Blackwell, Oxford. 14. Przybyła Katarzyna, Kachniarz Marian (2017), The impact of administrative reform on the central functions of larger polish cities, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol... (in print) 15. Przybyła Katarzyna, Kulczyk-Dynowska Alina, Kachniarz Marian (2014), Quality of Life in the Regional Capitals of Poland, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 48, Number 1/March, pp.181-195. 16. Sobczyk Mieczysław (2010), Statystyka opisowa [Descriptive statistics], C.H.Beck Publishers, Warsaw. 17. Stanisławski Miłosz (2010), Ocena efektywności restrukturyzacji wybranego sektora gospodarki w Polsce z wykorzystaniem taksonomicznego miernika rozwoju społeczno – gospodarczego[The evaluation of restructuring effectiveness of the selected economy sector in Poland using taxonomic measure of socio-economic development], “Bank & Credit”, No. 41(6), pp. 85–104. 18. Świąder Małgorzata, Szewrański Szymon, Kazak Jan (2016), Spatial-Temporal Diversification of Poverty in Wroclaw, Procedia Engineering, Volume 161, pp. 1596- 1600. 19. Swianiewicz Paweł, Łukomska Julita (2004), Władze samorządowe wobec lokalnego rozwoju gospodarczego. Które polityki są skuteczne? [Local authorities for local economic development. Which policies are effective?], Samorząd Terytorialny [Local Government], No. 6, pp. 14-32. 20. Wilcoxon F. (1949), Some rapid approximate statistical procedures, Stamford, CT: StamfordResearch Laboratories, American Cyanamid Corporation. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/100230 |