Jiranyakul, Komain (2020): Government Expenditures and Economic Growth: A Cointegration Analysis for Thailand under the Floating Exchange Rate Regime.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_100284.pdf Download (62kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Contributing to the controversial issue on the impact of government spending on economic growth, this paper shows that government spending has both long-run and short-run impacts in stimulating aggregate output in Thailand during the floating exchange rate regime. In addition, real money supply can also stimulate aggregate output in the long run even though it does not have any contribution to economic growth in the short run. Based on quarterly dataset during 1997Q3 to 2017Q4, the results suggest that expansionary fiscal policy is effective under the floating exchange rate regime.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Government Expenditures and Economic Growth: A Cointegration Analysis for Thailand under the Floating Exchange Rate Regime |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Government expenditures, money supply, cointegration, causality |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy |
Item ID: | 100284 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Komain Jiranyakul |
Date Deposited: | 11 May 2020 11:55 |
Last Modified: | 11 May 2020 11:55 |
References: | Aschuaer, D. A., (1989). Is public expenditures productive? Journal of Monetary Economics, 23(2), 177-200. Asimakopoulos, S. and Karavias, Y., (2016). The impact of government size on economic growth: a threshold analysis. Economics Letters, 139(C), 65-68. Barro, R. J., (1990). Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 103-126. Berger, H. and Osterholm, P., (2009). Does money still matter for the U.S. output. Economics Letters, 102(3), 143-146. Biswal, B., Dhawan, U. and Lee, G., (1999). Testing Wagner versus Keynes using disaggregated public expenditure data for Canada. Applied Economics, 31(10), 1283-1291. Carianni, P., (2012). Money and output: new evidence based on wavelet coherence. Economics Letters, 116(3), 547-550. Chang, T, Liu, W. and Caudill, S., (2004). A re-examination of Wagner’s law for ten countries based on cointegration and error-correction modeling techniques. Applied Financial Economics, 14(8), 577-589. Christie, T., (2014). The effect of government spending on economic growth: testing for the non-linear hypothesis. Bulletin of Economic Research, 66(2), 183-204. Devarajan, S., Swaroop, P and Zou, H., (1996). The composition of public expenditure and economic growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 37(2-3), 313-344. Dudzeviute, G., Simelyte, A. and Liucvaitiene, A., (2018). Government expenditure and economic growth in the European Union countries. International Journal of Social Economics, 45(2), 372-386. Engle, R. F. and Granger, C. W. J., (1987). Conintegration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(3), 251-276. Granger, C. W. J., (1980). Testing for causality: a personal viewpoint. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2(1), 329-352. Hafer, R. W. and Kutan, A. M., (1997). More evidence on the money-output relationship. Economic Inquiry, 35(1), 48-58. Hayo, B., (1999). Money-output Granger causality revisited: an empirical analysis of EU countries. Applied Economics, 31(11), 1489-1501. Holmes, J. M. and Hutton, P. A., (1990). On the causal relationship between government expenditures and national income. Review of Economics and Statistics, 72(1), 87-95. Ilzetzky, E., Mendoza, E. G. and Vegh, C. A., (2013). How big (small?) are fiscal multipliers?, Journal of Monetary Economics, 60(2), 239-254. Jiranyakul, K. and Brahmasrene, T., (2007). The relationship between government expenditures and economic growth in Thailand. Journal of Economic and Economic Education Research, 8(1), 93-103. Kichian, M., (2012). Financial condition and the money-output relationship in Canada. Staff Working Papers 12-13, Bank of Canada. Kumar, S., Webber, D. J. and Fargher, S., (2012). Wagner’s law revisited: cointegration and causality tests for New Zealand. Applied Economics, 44(5), 607-616. MacKinnon, J. G., (2010). Critical values for cointegration tests. Working Paper No. 1227, Economics Department, Queen’s University. Miller, S. M. and Russek, F. S., (1997). Fiscal structures and economic growth: international evidence. Economic Inquiry, 35(3), 603-613. Paparas, D., Richter, C. and Kostakis, I., (2019). The validity of Wagner’s law in the United Kingdom during the last two centuries. International Economics and Economic Policy, 16(2), 269-291. Ram, R. (1986). Government size and economic growth: a new framework and some evidence from cross-section and time series. American Economic Review, 76(1), 191-203. Shi, S., Hurn, S. and Phillips, P. C. B., (2016). Causal change detection in possibly integrated system: revisiting the money-income relationship. NCER Working Paper Series 113, National Center for Economic Research. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/100284 |