Mundaca, Gabriela and Strand, Jon (2020): Carbon pricing of international transport fuels: Impacts on carbon emissions and trade activity.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_100347.pdf Download (409kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We study impacts of carbon pricing to international transport fuels on fuel consumption and carbon emissions, trade activity, focusing on sea freight which constitutes the most important international trade transport activity. We use the WITS global dataset for international trade for the years 2009-2017 to estimate the impacts of changes in the global average bunker fuel price on the weight times distance for goods transported and carbon emission from international shipping. We find quite strong but variable negative effects of fuel cost increases on weight times distance for traded goods, and on carbon emissions from sea freight, for the heaviest goods categories at the 6-digit HS levels of aggregation in global trade, with bunker-price elasticities ranging from -0.03 up to -0.52. Considering an increase in the bunker fuel price as a proxy for a fuel tax, our results then indicate substantial impacts of bunker fuel taxes on the volume of sea transport, on bunker fuel consumption, and on carbon emissions from the international shipping sector. Our results indicate that, for the current level of international trade, a global tax of $40 per ton CO2 tax will reduce carbon emissions from global shipping fleet by about 7% for the heaviest traded products; and by most so for goods with particularly high weight-to-value ratios such as fossil fuels and ores.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Carbon pricing of international transport fuels: Impacts on carbon emissions and trade activity |
English Title: | Carbon pricing of international transport fuels: Impacts on carbon emissions and trade activity |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | International Trade, shipping, carbon taxation, carbon emissions |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F18 - Trade and Environment |
Item ID: | 100347 |
Depositing User: | Gabriela Mundaca |
Date Deposited: | 15 May 2020 05:23 |
Last Modified: | 15 May 2020 05:23 |
References: | Alchian, A. A. and W.R. Allen (1964). University Economics. Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont, California. Arellano M. and O. Bover (1995). Another look at the instrumental variables estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics 68, 29 – 51. Arkolakis, C. and M.-A. Muendler (2010). The extensive margin of exporting products: a firm-level analysis. NBER Working Paper # 16641. Arkolakis, C, A. Costinot and A. Rodriguez-Clare (2012). New Trade Models, Same Old Gains? American Economic Review, 102(1), 94 – 130. Armington, P. (1969). A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production.” IMF Staff Papers 16(1), 159 – 178. Behar A. and A. J. Venables (2011). “Transport Costs and International Trade,” in Handbook of Transport Economics, Chapter 5. Edward Elgar Publishing. Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. 1985. “The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence.” Review of Economics and Statistics 67(3):474–81. Bernard, A., S. Redding and P.K. Schott (2010). Multiple-product firms and product switching. American Economic Review 100, 70 – 97. Bernard, A., S. Redding and P.K. Schott (2011). Multi-product firms and trade liberalization. Quarterly Journal of Economics 126, 1271 – 1318. Bernard A.B., E. Dhyne, G. Magerman, K. Manova and A. Moxnes (2017). The origins of firm heterogeneity: a production network approach. Tech. Rep., Eur. Cent. Adv.Res. Econ. Stat., Brussels. Bernard A.B., E.A. Bøler and S. Dhingra (2018). Firm-to-firm connections in Colombian imports. In World Trade Evolution, ed. L.Y. Ing, M. Yu. Oxford, U.K.:Routledge. In press. Bernard A.B. and A. Moxnes (2018). Network and Trade. Annual Review of Economics 10, 65 – 85. Blundell R. and S. Bond (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 87, 115 – 143. Bougheas, S. and others. 1999. “Infrastructure, Transport Costs, and Trade.” Journal of International Economics 47:169–89. CE Delft (2017). Update of Maritime Greenhouse Gas Emission Projections. CE Delft. Chatterjee A., R. Dix-Carneiro and J. Vichyanond (2013). “Multi-product firms and exchange rate fluctuations,” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 5(2), 77 – 110. Chen N. and L. Juvenal (2019). Markups, quality, and trade costs. CEPR Working Paper # 14204. London, U.K, Cristea, A., D. Hummels, L. Puzzello and M. Avetisyan (2013). Trade and the greenhouse gas emissions from international freight transport. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 65, 153-173. Deardorff, A. V. 1998. “Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?” In J. A. Frankel (ed.), The Regionalization of the World Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. De Hoyos, R.E. and V. Sarafidis. (2006). “Testing for cross-sectional dependence in panel-data models.” The Stata Journal 6(4), 482 – 496. Eckel C., L. Iacovone, B. Javorcik and Neary, J.P. (2015). Multi-product firms at home and away: Costs- versus quality-based competence. Journal of International Economics, 95, 216 – 232. Eckel C. and Neary P. (2015). Multi-product firms and flexible manufacturing in the global economy. Review of Economic Studies, 77, 188 – 217. European Environment Agency (2016), EMBP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook, 2016. EEA Report 21/2016. Faber, J., D. Nelissen, G. Hon, H. Wang and M. Tsimplis (2012). Regulated slow steaming in maritime transport: An assessment of options, costs and benefits. Delft, NL: CE Delft. Faber, J, T. Huigen and S. Nelissen (2017). Regulating speed – a short-term measure to reduce maritime GHG emissions. Delft, the Netherlands: CE Delft. Franc, P. and L. Sutto (2014). Impact analysis on shipping lines and European ports or a cap-and-trade system on CO2 emissions in maritime transport. Maritime Policy Management 41, 61-78. Giannouli, M. and G. Mellios (2005). Overall Energy Efficiency and Specific CO2 Emissions for Passenger and Freight Transport. European Environmental Agency, 2005 TERM200527EEA32. Gohari, A., N. Matori, K. Wan Yusof, I. Toloue, and K. Cho Mying (2018). Effects of the Fuel Price Increase on the Operating Costs of Freight Transport Vehicles. E3S Web of Conferences 34. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183401022 International Maritime Organization (2015). Third IMO greenhouse gas study, 2014. London: International Maritime Organization. International Maritime Organization (2018). Initial IMO Strategy for Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships. http://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/GHG/Pages/default.aspx International Transport Forum (2018). CO2 emissions by ship type used in international trade. Excel data sheets. Paris: International Transport Forum, OECD, 2018. Keen, M., I. Parry and J. Strand (2013). Planes, boats and taxes: Charging for international aviation and maritime emissions. Economic Policy, October 2013, 701-749. Keen, M. and J. Strand (2007). Indirect taxes on international aviation. Fiscal Studies 28, 1 – 41. Kilian, L. and D. P. Murphy (2012). Why Agnostic Sign Restrictions Are Not Enough: Understanding the Dynamics of Oil Market VAR Models. Journal of the European Economic Association 10(5), 1166 – 1188. Kilian, L. and D. P. Murphy (2014). The Role of Inventories and Speculative Trading in the Global Market for Crude Oil. Journal of Applied Econometrics 29(3), 454 – 478. Lee, T., Y. Chang and P. T. W. Lee (2013). Economy-side impact analysis of a carbon tax on international container shipping. Transportation Research Part A 58, 87-102. Limão, N. and A. J. Venables (2001). Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, transport costs, and trade. World Bank Economic Review, 15 (3), 451-479. Lindstad, H., G. S. Eskeland (2015). Low carbon maritime transport: How speed, size and slenderness amounts to substantial capital energy substitution. Transportation Research Part D 41, 244-256. Lindstad, H., G. S. Eskeland, H. Psaraftis, I. Sandaas and A. H. Strømman (2015). Maritime shipping and emissions: A three-layered, damage-based approach. Ocean Engineering 110, 94-101. Mayer, T. and S. Zignago (2005). Market Access in Global and Regional Trade. CEPII Working Paper 2. Mayer, T., M. Melitz, and G. Ottaviano (2014). Market size, competition, and the product mix of exporter. American Economic Review 104, 495 – 536. McCollum, D., G. Gould and D. Greene (2009). Greenhouse gas emissions from aviation and marine transportation: Mitigation potential and policies. Report, Pew Centre on Global Climate Change. Nunes, R.A.O., Alvim-Ferraz, M.C.M., Martins, F.G., Sousa, S.I.V., (2017). The activity based methodology to assess ship emissions - a review. Environ. Pollut. 231, 87-103. Olmer, N., B. Comer, R. Biswajoy, M. Xiaoli and D. Rutherford (2017). Greenhouse gas emissions from global shipping, 2013-2015. Report, International Council on Clean Transportation. Parry, I. A., D. Heine, K. Kizzier and T. Smith (2018). Carbon Taxation for International Maritime Fuels: Assessing the Options. IMF Working Paper, WP/18/203. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund. Peters, G. P. and E. G. Hertwich (2008). CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. Environmental Science and Technology 42 (5), 1401–1407. Rodriguez-Lopez, J.A. (2011). Prices and Exchange Rates: A Theory of Disconnect. The Review of Economic Studies 78(3), 1135 – 1177. Roodman, D. (2009). “How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata.” The Stata Journal 9(1), 86 – 136. Schim van der Loeff, W., Godar, J. and Prakash, V. (2018). A spatially explicit data-driven approach to calculating commodity-specific shipping emissions per vessel. Journal of Cleaner Production. DOI: 10.1016/j. jclepro.2018.09.053 Schuitmaker, R. (2016). Evolution of global maritime freight energy demand and CO2 emissions: A BAU and 2DS scenario. Master Thesis, Utrecht University. Shapiro, J. S. (2016). Trade Costs, CO2, and the Environment. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 8(4), 220 – 254. Sheng, Y., S. Xunpeng and B. Su (2018), Re-analyzing the economic impact of a global bunker emissions charge. Energy Economics 74, 107-119. Smith, T. W. P., Jalkanen, J. P., Anderson, B. A., Corbett, J. J., Faber, J., Hanayama, S., …& Pandey, A. (2015a). Third IMO Greenhouse Gas Study 2014. http://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/PollutionPrevention/AirPollution/Documents/Third%20Greenhouse%20Gas%20Study/GHG3%20Executive%20Summary%20and%20Report.pdf Smith, T.W.P., Prakash, V., Aldous, L., Krammer, P. (2015b). The Existing Shipping- Fleet's CO2 Efficiency. International Maritime Organisation, London, UK. Smith, T. W. P., Raucci, C., Hosseinloo, S. H., Rojon, I., Calleya, J., De La Fuente, S.S., Wu, P., & Palmer, K. (2016). CO2 emissions from international shipping: Possible reduction targets and their associated pathways. UMAS. http://www.lowcarbonshipping.co.uk/files/ucl_admin/DSA_2016_Co2_emissions_in_shipping.pdf Stern, N., J. Stiglitz, et. al. 2017. Report from the high-level commission on carbon prices. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.P UNCTAD (2009). Review of Maritime Transport. New York and Geneva: United Nations. UNCTAD (2018). Review of Maritime Transport. New York and Geneva: United Nations. University of Maryland National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (2019). Global Terrorism Database. University of Maryland at College Park, USA. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/100347 |